The moral hypocrisy of conservative leaders is stunning
Opinion by Michael Gerson
It was stolen, said conservative luminary William Bennett on a recent podcast. The election was stolen.
In a Dec. 10 open letter, a group of conservative stalwarts including activist Gary Bauer, former senator and former president of the Heritage Foundation James DeMint, and head of the Family Research Council Tony Perkins alleged that President Donald J. Trump is the lawful winner of the presidential election. They called on state legislators in battleground states to appoint clean slates of electors to the Electoral College to support President Trump and urged the House and Senate to reject competing slates reflecting the actual vote.
For some of us, watching prominent conservatives turn against rationality and democracy is not just disappointing; it is disorienting.
As a youth in the 1980s and 1990s, I could not accept the hardest-edged versions of the conservative tradition. Yet when leaders such as Bauer, DeMint and Perkins claimed to believe in ordered liberty, protected by democracy and the rule of law, I did not doubt them. I thought, by their own lights, they were people of conviction. And this was particularly true of Bennett, whom I viewed with awe. No one, I felt, better combined conservative reasoning with humane learning.
Much of what I believed is now suspect. Ideological stars that once seemed fixed to me have shifted, leaving an unfamiliar sky.
The intellectual bankruptcy and moral hypocrisy of many conservative leaders is stunning. People who claimed to favor limited government now applaud Trumps use of the executive branch to undermine an election. A similar attempt by Barack Obama would have brought comparisons to Fidel Castro. People who talked endlessly about respecting the Constitution affirm absurd slanders against the constitutional order. People who claimed to be patriots now spread false claims about their countrys fundamental corruption. People who talked of honoring the rule of law now jerk and gyrate according to the whims of a lawless leader.
These conservative leaders no longer deserve the assumption of sincerity. They are spreading conspiratorial lies so unlikely and irrational, they must know them to be lies. But their motive remains a matter of debate.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-moral-hypocrisy-of-conservative-leaders-is-stunning/2020/12/14/35e62f16-3e2d-11eb-8bc0-ae155bee4aff_story.html
Sounds as if Gerson has seen the light.
dchill
(38,505 posts)I backspaced "at heart," because.
LastDemocratInSC
(3,647 posts)that contained an especially descriptive term for these hypocrites: MAZI.
dchill
(38,505 posts)Backseat Driver
(4,393 posts)debating the merits of voting via automated machines with and without paper trails. I've always tried to keep up with technology but never learned to "hack." This election focused on the merits of mail-in voting as separate from Absentee - and we've seen how easily a mail slowdown can be implemented to suppress votes by every human taking part in the process of receiving/delivering the mail. We watched the results of choosing badly written code (Iowa primary caucuses) and the interminable security updates to our personal computers. We experienced the consequences of "breaches."
Sometimes I think Ted Kacinsky's manifesto contained much truth about how advanced technology would rip the human social fabric though his method to gain attention to those thoughts were clearly illegal and morally reprehensible.
I too am stunned at political oathtakers' (public servants all) refusal to uphold democratic values underpinning our Constitution. The GOP, IMO, has stooped to the lowest denunciation of those principals, instead embracing self-interest and self-aggrandizement at its worst of the capitalist system. Some social issues can only be addressed, best-served, or met with socialist "social-like" programs at the country's highest levels, less so at more intimate community levels where personal involvement of compassionate friends and neighbors can be important.
Technology speeds up processes using only two digits while TPTB fall farther and farther behind handling the social consequences of that technology on large populations. Indeed, they want to suppress the count of same. It's opened up a ripe field for "hackers" disturbing accurate processing of the information we as individuals need to make wise, compassionate decisions as well as closed opportunities for workers and students at lower income levels to "pull themselves up by their own bootstraps," and everyone in some minority is now discriminated against in every way that was once supposed to be protective as well as through growing elements that grow rich through criminality and violence.
Stunned and SMH!
raccoon
(31,111 posts)Midnight Writer
(21,769 posts)They know the truth. They are exploiting the gullible who don't know the truth.