GOP Ballot Audits Aren't About Overturning the Last Election. They're About Overturning the Next One
If you needed any further evidence of the corrosive effect of Republicans performative election audit in Arizona, Pennsylvania Republicans now say they want one too. A group of Pennsylvania Republican lawmakers steeped in the election conspiracy claims of former President Donald Trump made a pilgrimage to Maricopa County Wednesday to see for themselves how the partisan review of the 2020 results was going. The aim of the visit is exporting the Arizona model back to their home state, which President Joe Biden won by a point.
The team of state legislatorsSens. Doug Mastriano and Cris Dush, and Rep. Rob Kauffmanmet with Arizona officials before being briefed by the election conspiracy spewing head of Cyber Ninjas, the Florida-based firm with no prior election experience thats leading the audit. Cyber Ninjas has been given access to Maricopa Countys ballots and employed a team of contractors to scour for bamboo-laced China ballots that Trump supports believe with all their hearts were imported ahead of election day to swing the vote to Joe Biden. Each member of the Pennsylvania delegation in Arizona this week were among the 64 GOP legislators in the state that signed a letter asking the states congressional delegation to object to Pennsylvanias electoral college votes going to Biden, the made-up procedural move that Trump supporters were demanding as they stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6. One of the Pennsylvania trio, Sen. Mastriano, was in Washington to protest the election result that day, but says he left before the Capitol was stormed.
After their visit, the group largely bypassed traditional media outlets, focusing instead for right-wing outlets. When asked in passing by an Associated Press reporter if theyd like to replicate Arizonas process in Pennsylvania, Sen. Dush said, Without question. Absolutely. Speaking with a local radio host from WEEO-FM about the trip, Sen. Mastriano said, well bring the information back to the Senate leadership, well back-brief them on the way ahead and then hopefully we can come up with an approach here to make sure every person in Pennsylvania can rest assured they have one vote and it counts.
The trio offered assurances that this wasnt about altering the 2020 election results. Im not about overturning anything, Mastriano explained to the Wall Street Journal. Im just trying to find out what went right, what went wrong? And how do we have better elections in the future? But did something go wrong? Other than their guy lost? Forty-seven percent of the people in this country dont have faith in the electoralelectoral integrity right now, Dush told the Journal. And my constituents are very much up in arms, with the lack of any movement on trying to find out what happened.
Just finding out what happened is the cover, as it has been in Arizona, because who doesnt want to find out what happened, after all? Theres no harm in being hyper-vigilant, unless you have something to hide, right? But the self-fulfilling logic of intentionally and erroneously sowing doubt about an election and then using that doubt to justify dissecting it to the point of abstraction, allows you to draw whatever conclusions you want from the data. So expect vague, ominous conclusions that never quite stand up in the light of day, but the Republican thinking isit wont really matter. The damage will already be done, the suspicion will be real, even if the problem isnt.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gop-ballot-audits-arent-about-overturning-the-last-election-theyre-about-overturning-the-next-one/ar-AAKFD4W
louis-t
(23,297 posts)Only interested in destroying Biden votes. Finding any excuse to throw them away. Hang a cloud of suspicion over every recount and audit. Remember what they did to Hillary Clinton. 5 years of 'investigations' that always ended with Trey Gowdy or some other repug asshole swaggering up to a podium somewhere to say "Yeah, but we still have a lot of QUESTIONS!". Even after she testified for 11 hours under oath, they still had 'questions'.
LT Barclay
(2,606 posts)It would be very revealing.