Who and what may suffer most from Kakhovka dam destruction - expert interview
Who and what may suffer most from Kakhovka dam destruction - expert interview
Who and what may suffer most from Kakhovka dam destruction expert interview
June 19, 2023, 05:39 PM
https://english.nv.ua/nation/who-and-what-may-suffer-most-from-kakhovka-dam-destruction-expert-interview-50333043.html

The consequences of the Kakhovka HPP explosion not only destroy the ecosystems of the region, but also make certain areas uninhabitable and destroy the economic potential of the region (Photo:REUTERS/Inna Varenytsia)
Sudden floods, the drying of the local climate, the lack of drinking and technical water, and the impoverishment of the soil will radically change the lives of the residents of Kherson Oblast in the coming years, Kherson State University professor Ihor Pylypenko said in an interview with NV on June 19.
The largest man-made disaster in Europe in the last decades is what experts call the events stemming from Russian forces blowing up the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant (HPP) dam on June 6. This led to a rapid drop in the water level in the Kakhovka water reservoir and flooding of the downstream Dnipro River basin.
There were casualties, a significant part of the population of the city of Kherson and nearby villages had to be evacuated. Hundreds of tons of machine oil got into the water, as well as the contents of dumpsters, fuel storages, warehouses with chemicals, fertilizers, and animal burial grounds, etc. The Dnipro River flooded tens of thousands of hectares of forests and fields, destroying animal habitats.
The White House declared that Russia was responsible for the devastation caused by the destruction of the Kakhovka HPP, while the MEPs called the destruction of the Kakhovka HPP a Russia war crime.
NV: What is the most serious, most damaging environmental risk caused by the destruction of the Kakhovka HPP?
Pylypenko: Humans have created a huge artificial ecosystem. Therefore, we cannot talk about exclusively environmental issues. I would say this is rather a socio-ecological problem, where a human is at the top and owner of this system, who, having fit into this system, uses its water resources.
Imagine the ancient Egyptian civilization that arose on the banks of the Nile River, and suddenly the Nile does not exist anymore. We do not say that we have some kind of civilization there, but people drew upon on this water resource via their settlement system, economic activity, and now there is no water. That is, now there is no reservoir, which functioned not only for storing and accumulating water, but also for distributing it for various economic needs.
The issue of environmental risk is extremely complex and very difficult to answer. From my point of view, the population will be the most affected link in this chain of interaction nature-population-economy.
NV: What will happen to the agricultural lands that are now without the irrigation on which they depended so much? What processes for the soils in the region are threatened by the consequences of Russias destruction of the Kakhovka HPP?
Pylypenko: We have a rather colorful soil system there. But the areas that used the central irrigation system will suffer the most. They will be characterized by an increase in the level of salinity. And this will lead to loss of soil fertility. Although, lets say, depending on what year it will be, what the soils moisture reserves are, perhaps the soil will still be able to produce crops for some time.
For example, we will switch to crops that require less moisture, cutting down on growing onions, eggplants, sweet peppers, tomatoes, etc.
This problem will be less on sandy soils, where irrigation was localized, using underground aquifers. Therefore, we hope that the level of underground water that was formed there will allow our farmers, in particular small ones, to continue growing agricultural crops, primarily vegetables, in particular in closed soil, i.e., in greenhouses, for many years to come.
As for cultivation in open ground, on sandy soils, where the parent rock is based on sand, and the groundwater is relatively shallow, in principle, we can continue growing melon crops. Lets put it this way, the well-known Kherson watermelons, which most Ukrainian consumers know, are also grown in areas unaffected by the dams destruction. They will grow there, although there are risks. It depends on whether the spring period is wet, whether there is enough water to produce a crop.
NV: So, will the most difficult thing be with vegetable crops?
Pylypenko: Yes. And Im more interested in the vegetable set in the hierarchy, lets say, of consumer values. I think that all Ukrainians felt the absence of Kherson Oblast on the Ukrainian vegetable market even last year. Undoubtedly, the vegetable growth is observed in other regions of the country, in particular due to the use of greenhouse farming. But you understand that the resources of heat, relatively speaking, of the forest-steppe, Prykarpattia region and Kherson Oblast or Mykolayiv Oblast, are incomparable. It is another set of temperatures.
Snip...
Much more at the link.
https://english.nv.ua/nation/who-and-what-may-suffer-most-from-kakhovka-dam-destruction-expert-interview-50333043.html
~~~☆~~~☆~~~☆~~~☆~~~☆~~~
This is a long and comprehensive interview. I hope you enjoy learning more about the effects of the ecocide war crime perpetrated by the invaders. The New Voice of Ukraine has been a great news source for me. You can find the main page, with options in English, Ukrainian and Russian here:
https://english.nv.ua/
❤️pants
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)But of course nature's taking a huge hit.
From the viewpoint of Russia, devastating the Russian side of the Dnipro basin, villages and farmlands would be a more than acceptable cost of further devastating Ukraine. All Ukraine's dams are potential weapons of destruction.
Apparently this area is somewhat like California to us -- a high agricultural producer due to warmer climate than by far most of the rest of Ukraine.
Thanks, littlemiss.
littlemissmartypants
(31,725 posts)I was reading a thread on Twitter by a woman who is a major player in Ukraine's agricultural industry. She posted pictures of one of her farms with great details. The Russians were finally pushed back and she was able to return having urgently evacuated to evade capture, death and God knows what else to find almost complete destruction.
What they didn't steal, they dismantled and destroyed. They left one generator completely dismantled and non functional. She had had several. They even dismantled the plumbing. They took all of the farm equipment except one machine that they had also deconstructed.
Windows were broken. Planted fields were destroyed, the crops left demolished by indiscriminate digging. Harvested crops in storage were stolen or destroyed. She went building by building, rooms, basements, out buildings, barns, equipment shelters. It was devastating to see.
I can't imagine the heartbreak of seeing your life's work so utterly eradicated. This represented just one of her farms and as expected she is righteously angry.
But amazingly, she's also determined to rebuild. I am utterly floored by the resilience of all of the Ukrainian people I've read about. She is exceptional in this regard.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)playing out in Ukraine. Inspiring, and don't we all need all we can get.
In a way, farmers are always at war. She still has her land, damaged as it may be, and the reasons for farming are more demanding than ever, so maybe more inevitable than otherwise?
The world's also getting to see 21st century Russia partly unleashed, 19th century still, refusing the civilizing agreements other nations advanced to since. And the peoples in the many other nations Russia wants to conquer are seeing they'd do to them. These stories about this devastation only guess at its extent on the Russian-held side.
littlemissmartypants
(31,725 posts)Because of tightening in the banking industry and I thought but what about crypto, the currency of the underworld thieves? Then
today, like magic, Deutsche Bank announced it's getting in the crypto business. If it's not one thing it's another.
It will be interesting to see what's next for Ukraine, for sure. But the dynamics created by this overarching global engagement are extremely interesting and it seems the criminal element is mighty persistent while being underestimated.
Every day I hope to add another year to my life so I can live to see the positive outcomes I have dreamed of my entire life up to now.
❤️

Link to tweet
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Along with $$$$$, another commonality is $$$$$ laundering, of course. That graphic has names I haven't thought about in a while. The DoJ's and our intelligence services' probably display these days in multiple layers to make sense of all the villains and connections.
Igel
(37,395 posts)It's hurting Russian speakers.
It's hurting Russian defensive lines.
It hurts Crimea's water supply.
Why would Russia do this?
Because Russian-Ukrainians and 1/5 of a person (at best) when they don't serve a propaganda purpose. Hurt them, whatever, there's a fly in the room!
Screwing with a Ukr offensive is the purpose of defensive lines; the *flooded* Dnipro is a defensive line on steroids.
It screws with Ukr water supplies--drinking, irrigation, whatever. The Ukr russophones? "1/5 of a person" ring a bell?
It hurts Crimea's water supply? Meh. All the news always and only says it was the Ukr that effed over Crimea's water supply. Rah-Rah Rahssiya! Ewww Ewww Ukraine! All the news that fits sees print.
Or maybe somebody just screwed up on the Russian side. "Oops. *They* planted explosives? And *we* planted explosives? And others were planted last June? And nobody talked to each other? So we had *that* much explosive? Didn't anybody talk to each other ... Think it through ... Hey, you got my 100 grams? I want a loan for the next 2 weeks. ... Pay it back? Harvest my organs, I'm dead."
I haven't heard any idea about when the former reservoir is now just another bit of the Dnipro that deserves a front line constructed. I'd seriously love to find that the Ukr forces have managed to establish defensible territory on the left-hand side of the Dnipro on the former bottom of that reservoir when the rusnya forces decided it was dry enough. (But I'd hate to be the first in the muck. Reservoir bottoms are like unkempt and neglected human bottoms--who knows what crap accumulates there, and it's rash to show up too soon.)
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)because unavoidably true.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)But too sad to learn of so much suffering and so many more obstacles before them. sigh