Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 06:52 AM Aug 2012

WaPo's Michael Gersson's got a FEVER, and the only PRESCRIPTION is Chris Christie as Mitt's VP pick

The best VP for Romney
By Michael Gerson

So let me add my own empty conjecture. Romney has a particularly strong stable of prospects. Rob Portman would best fit Romney’s public style and be a major asset in governing. Tim Pawlenty possesses a genuine blue-collar appeal and would be a grateful, loyal and tireless selection. Paul Ryan is the intellectual leader of the GOP and the most passionate prosecutor of the case against President Obama’s fiscal recklessness.

But the trend of the last few weeks favors Chris Christie. The 2012 election has already proved to be a vicious, negative slugfest. In the last few weeks, Romney has been accused of committing a felony, avoiding taxes for a decade and contributing to the death of a woman with cancer. The squeals of various fact-checking outfits go ignored in Chicago. Romney, his family and staff are likely to feel offended and aggrieved. The question they are probably asking themselves is not: Who is the best vice presidential pick? Rather, it is: Who is the best wartime vice presidential pick?

Romney needs more than an appealing spokesman. He needs someone to engage aggressively on his behalf in the daily D-Day this campaign has become. All four leading vice presidential prospects might play this role. Christie would clearly play it best. He is the only one who seems to relish this sort of political conflict. And he has good reason to relish it. He is a natural, a prodigy, at the art of confrontation.

It is one thing to pit Ohio or Minnesota or Wisconsin against the Chicago way. I predict that Romney will want — and Republicans will welcome — Jersey vs. Chicago.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/the-best-vp-for-romney/2012/08/09/8f531236-e24b-11e1-98e7-89d659f9c106_blog.html
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo's Michael Gersson's got a FEVER, and the only PRESCRIPTION is Chris Christie as Mitt's VP pick (Original Post) Amerigo Vespucci Aug 2012 OP
Republican crook liars who run for President need attack dog demagogues for Vice President. gordianot Aug 2012 #1
Romney has a particularly strong stable of prospects rurallib Aug 2012 #2
This won't compute.. noel711 Aug 2012 #3
I agree with the "what Mitt wants" thing, but... Amerigo Vespucci Aug 2012 #4

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
1. Republican crook liars who run for President need attack dog demagogues for Vice President.
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 08:52 AM
Aug 2012

Together they would make a fair mob movie reflecting events of a previous generation

rurallib

(62,406 posts)
2. Romney has a particularly strong stable of prospects
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 09:39 AM
Aug 2012

i stopped reading right there. Obviously the guy is delusional

noel711

(2,185 posts)
3. This won't compute..
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 09:42 AM
Aug 2012

If Romney picks Christie.. all the air will get sucked out of the room.
Christie will effectively run the campaign..
his 'take no prisoners' bullying style will trump MIttens
and he'll overshadow the main player...

Is this wHat Mitt wants? No.
Same thing with Paul Ryan...
his spartan style and cruel budge/legislative proposals
will also steamroll Mitt's presence.
Is this what Mitt wants? No.

But if he picks Portman or Pawlenty,
more vanilla white bread.

Any way you slice it... Mitt loses.

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
4. I agree with the "what Mitt wants" thing, but...
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 09:57 AM
Aug 2012

...the story of the day is Mitt being "pressured" to put Ryan on the ticket, and if enough people get behind Christie (Scarborough AND Mika were SWOONING over the possibility this morning), there may be some pressure in that direction as well.

In short...Mitt is John McCain and he's being told by his handlers that he's not popular enough and needs to "shake things up" by putting Sarah Palin on the ticket.

But you;re right...either way, Mitt loses.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»WaPo's Michael Gersson's ...