An Unserious Man
So if we add up Mr. Ryans specific proposals, we have $4.3 trillion in tax cuts, partially offset by around $1.7 trillion in spending cuts with the tax cuts, surprise, disproportionately benefiting the top 1 percent, while the spending cuts would primarily come at the expense of low-income families. Over all, the effect would be to increase the deficit by around two and a half trillion dollars.
Yet Mr. Ryan claims to be a deficit hawk. Whats the basis for that claim?
Well, he says that he would offset his tax cuts by base broadening, eliminating enough tax deductions to make up the lost revenue. Which deductions would he eliminate? He refuses to say and realistically, revenue gain on the scale he claims would be virtually impossible.
At the same time, he asserts that he would make huge further cuts in spending. What would he cut? He refuses to say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/20/opinion/krugman-an-unserious-man.html?hp