Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 05:05 PM Jan 2013

Bill McKibben: Climate change won't wait

...It's not at all clear that President Obama understands this.

That's why his administration is sometimes peeved when they don't get the credit they think they deserve for tackling the issue in his first term in office. The measure they point to most often is the increase in average mileage for automobiles, which will slowly go into effect over the next decade.

That's precisely the kind of gradual transformation that people — and politicians — like. But physics isn't impressed. If we're to slow the pace of climate change we need to cut emissions globally at a sensational rate, by something like 5% a year.

It's not Obama's fault that that's not happening. He can't force it to happen, especially with Congress so deeply in debt to the fossil fuel industry. But he should at least be doing absolutely everything he can on his own authority. That might include new Environmental Protection Agency regulations, for example. And he could refuse to grant the permit for the building of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline....
via http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mckibben-climate-20130106,0,6917040.story
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill McKibben: Climate change won't wait (Original Post) limpyhobbler Jan 2013 OP
Its going to have to NoOneMan Jan 2013 #1
Sadly, McKibben does have a point. AverageJoe90 Jan 2013 #2
And remember, NoOneMan Jan 2013 #3
You're kidding, right? AverageJoe90 Jan 2013 #4
Not kidding a bit NoOneMan Jan 2013 #5
I wasn't being literal, by the way. More like an SMH type statement..... AverageJoe90 Jan 2013 #6
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
2. Sadly, McKibben does have a point.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 06:53 PM
Jan 2013

I'm not going to go as far as to say that there is no hope, or whatever, but the time for meaningful action, at least in terms of having a good chance of avoiding 2*C by 2100, is now. And sadly, that time IS running a little short.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
3. And remember,
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 08:50 PM
Jan 2013

2C is just an arbitrary, safe tic mark. Even that as a ceiling could be far more disastrous than anyone predicted a decade ago.

We're probably on the cusp of going back to an active evolution state; the universe may even "want" this. Its no big deal in the cosmic scheme of things.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
4. You're kidding, right?
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 09:52 PM
Jan 2013

And, when I say that, I'm referring to this:

We're probably on the cusp of going back to an active evolution state; the universe may even "want" this. Its no big deal in the cosmic scheme of things.


I'm sorry, but.....this is, well, just strange(putting it nicely).

As for the 2*C ceiling, I wouldn't quite go as far to say "far more" disastrous......somewhat more may indeed be true, though. But it's also possible some things may actually not be as bad as well; I guess we'll just have to see.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Bill McKibben: Climate ch...