Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bill McKibben: Climate change won't wait
...It's not at all clear that President Obama understands this.
That's why his administration is sometimes peeved when they don't get the credit they think they deserve for tackling the issue in his first term in office. The measure they point to most often is the increase in average mileage for automobiles, which will slowly go into effect over the next decade.
That's precisely the kind of gradual transformation that people and politicians like. But physics isn't impressed. If we're to slow the pace of climate change we need to cut emissions globally at a sensational rate, by something like 5% a year.
It's not Obama's fault that that's not happening. He can't force it to happen, especially with Congress so deeply in debt to the fossil fuel industry. But he should at least be doing absolutely everything he can on his own authority. That might include new Environmental Protection Agency regulations, for example. And he could refuse to grant the permit for the building of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline....
via http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mckibben-climate-20130106,0,6917040.storyThat's why his administration is sometimes peeved when they don't get the credit they think they deserve for tackling the issue in his first term in office. The measure they point to most often is the increase in average mileage for automobiles, which will slowly go into effect over the next decade.
That's precisely the kind of gradual transformation that people and politicians like. But physics isn't impressed. If we're to slow the pace of climate change we need to cut emissions globally at a sensational rate, by something like 5% a year.
It's not Obama's fault that that's not happening. He can't force it to happen, especially with Congress so deeply in debt to the fossil fuel industry. But he should at least be doing absolutely everything he can on his own authority. That might include new Environmental Protection Agency regulations, for example. And he could refuse to grant the permit for the building of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1466 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill McKibben: Climate change won't wait (Original Post)
limpyhobbler
Jan 2013
OP
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)1. Its going to have to
We've got jobs to create and elections to win
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)2. Sadly, McKibben does have a point.
I'm not going to go as far as to say that there is no hope, or whatever, but the time for meaningful action, at least in terms of having a good chance of avoiding 2*C by 2100, is now. And sadly, that time IS running a little short.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)3. And remember,
2C is just an arbitrary, safe tic mark. Even that as a ceiling could be far more disastrous than anyone predicted a decade ago.
We're probably on the cusp of going back to an active evolution state; the universe may even "want" this. Its no big deal in the cosmic scheme of things.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)4. You're kidding, right?
And, when I say that, I'm referring to this:
We're probably on the cusp of going back to an active evolution state; the universe may even "want" this. Its no big deal in the cosmic scheme of things.
I'm sorry, but.....this is, well, just strange(putting it nicely).
As for the 2*C ceiling, I wouldn't quite go as far to say "far more" disastrous......somewhat more may indeed be true, though. But it's also possible some things may actually not be as bad as well; I guess we'll just have to see.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)5. Not kidding a bit
Why would you think so?
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)6. I wasn't being literal, by the way. More like an SMH type statement.....