VIEWPOINT: Ambassador Chris Stevens Deserved Better Than What Benghazi Became
By Hayes Brown on May 19, 2013 at 12:00 pm
I didnt know Chris Stevens. I admit that the first Id heard of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya was the morning of Sept. 12, when I woke up and, along with the rest of the country, learned that he and three others had died in an attack on a diplomatic mission in Benghazi. By all accounts, Stevens was well-respected among his peers and adored by his family and friends. I didnt know Ambassador Stevens, but I do know one thing: he deserved better from his government all in these weeks and months after his death, from the Republican party that chose to place him center ring in an embarrassing circus to the Obama administration that failed in its responsibility to keep him safe.
In retrospect, the original Republican attempt to co-opt his death and turn it into something political, a weapon to use against President Obamas reelection, is almost to be expected. The Obama administrations troubling lack of transparency when it comes to national security matters certainly didnt help debunk the inchoate sense that something was being hidden from the public.
Since the election, however, the furor over Benghazi hasnt settled into sober examination of just went wrong. Instead, the sniping and bickering has seemed to escalate, keeping the tone surrounding the tragedy somewhere in the range of the level of discourse during the Whitewater scandal. By allowing the conversation to stay firmly on the questions that dont matter, such as Who changed the talking points?, we manage to avoid the questions that do, such as What do we do to keep this from happening again?
Republicans in Congress have sought to play up the former for all its worth, resulting in a waxing and waning faux scandal that reemerges to the headlines every few months. In the months after the election, Republican senators threatened to filibuster any number of President Obamas potential nominees unless they learned the truth about what happened. In the process, they and their House colleagues relentlessly attacked U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice for her presentation of what the administration initial knew about the tragedy, calling her incompetent and eventually forcing her to remove herself from the running to replace Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. As the release this week of emails surrounding the drafting of the talking points Rice used revealed, those attacks were misplaced.
full article
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/19/2025801/viewpoint-ambassador-chris-stevens-deserved-better-than-what-benghazi-became/
alsame
(7,784 posts)including Romney, were high-fiving each other when they heard the news. They never give a damn about the loss of any lives, it's always about the next election.