The Nation: Why the Obamas Should Embrace 'The Obamas'
After reading this, the book might not be as bad as first depicted.
Why the Obamas Should Embrace 'The Obamas'
Ilyse Hogue on January 11, 2012 - 1:44pm ET
snip//
Still, by centralizing the marriage as core to the narrative of the Obama presidency, Kantor is on to something important. Alongside policy concerns, people are hungry to understand the character of the people in charge of our country. Voters dont expect calmness to prevail in the pressure cooker of politics, and its not news to anyone that staffers sometimes lose their tempers or use foul language in the West Wing. But in voters never-ending quest to discern the substance and values in a political world littered with gossip and posturing, insight into family relationships provides a critical indicator of integrity, of authenticity, of that intangible quality of character that matters to three of four voters.
The way a candidate approaches marriage serves as one window into the equation of shared values. Its no accident that GOP opponents have focused as much time attacking Newt Gingrich for his string of divorces and for his decision to leave his second wife while she was hospitalized for cancer as they have on his toxic political record as Speaker of the House. Most Americans cannot picture themselves doing anything similar. Nor is it surprising that Americans have been fascinated by the union between Michele Bachmann and her enigmatic husband, Marcus. From her pronouncement of her own submissiveness in their marriage to his decision to spend the day before the Iowa caucus shopping for dog glasses, the bizarre story of their marriage added to a series of stumbles that ultimately sank her.
In contrast, Kantor portrays the Obamas marriage as not only filled with mutual respect and joy but also as reflective of the modern complications and challenges that many Americans face juggling two careers and family concerns. Covering the 2008 election made Kantor aware of how hungry votersespecially coveted women voterswere for this kind of story.
snip//
For a president who has been criticized for holding the public at arms length, the portrayal of him in the book can add texture to his humanity at a time voters are looking to reconnect to the incumbent. And while pundits speak of a potential enthusiasm gap among women voters, the story of the First Ladys influence over her devoted husbands agenda can help give confidence to a coveted demographic that can secure margins of victory in tight races.
Ms. Kantor writes in the book, Every day, he met with advisers who emphasized the practical realities of Washington, who reminded him of poll numbers; he spent his nights with Michelle, who talked about moral imperatives, aides said, who reminded him again and again that they were there to do good, to avoid being distracted by political noise, to be bold.
Rather than protesting, the White House should embrace the book as one that admirably depicts the first couple as thriving partners, even as they struggle against the constraints of antiquated roles in leading the country into a new millennium.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Ergo, it won't happen.
Michelle is a hero, though. There are a fair number of people who will drag their ass to the polls next November in no small part because they want to see her remain First Lady and they're not wrong.
babylonsister
(171,065 posts)Then again, she went out to disavow this book. Sigh.