Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 08:54 PM Aug 2013

From Spying on "Terrorists Abroad" to Suppressing Domestic Dissent: When We Become the Hunted

From Spying on "Terrorists Abroad" to Suppressing Domestic Dissent: When We Become the Hunted

...

Truthout recently spoke with Boghosian, executive director of the National Lawyers Guild, about the ever-expanding government/corporate surveillance state.


...

Heidi Boghosian: (...) Several other factors add to the urgency of this challenge: The Obama administration is on the defensive after Edward Snowden's disclosures and will likely invest even more resources to protect its perpetual "war on terror" campaign and the corporate partners that profit from this manufactured war. As the public, and certain legislators, express apprehension about mass surveillance, the executive branch and the NSA may enact more stringent measures to fortify and safeguard their highly sophisticated spying infrastructure.

On top of that, CEOs of telecommunications and defense companies such as Lockheed Martin, Verizon and Microsoft are allied with the administration, guiding telecommunications and anti-terrorism policies through the president's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee. And in addition to the lucrative business of data mining, corporations continue to adapt and refine technologies of war, from laser microphones to motion sensing capabilities, with which to monitor civilians.

...

We have created an entire new class of society that gathers and has access to classified information - an elite class that promises to grow as private companies seek increased revenue and as the government operates in unparalleled secrecy.

The majority of national intelligence, an astonishing 70 percent, is carried out by contractors. That translates into tens of thousands of analysts from more than 1,900 private firms who have performed intelligence functions over the past few years. Large contractors conduct most of the work, including Booz Allen Hamilton (which according to The New York Times, derived $1.3 billion in revenue from intelligence contracts), Northrop Grumman, L-3 Communications and Science Applications International Corporation (with 39,600 employees, a reported $11.17 billion in revenue as of 2013, and a recent $6.6 billion contract from the Defense Intelligence Agency).

In 2012, an estimated 1.1 million private contractors had security clearance. The number of federal employees with security clearance is 2.6 million.

...

Not only is it easy for the US and its contractors to focus on activists, it is imperative that they do so. They must target social advocates in order to justify maintaining their budgets and their livelihoods. There are simply not enough "terrorists" in existence for the government to warrant the current level of intelligence spending. As a result, enormous federal resources are devoted to identifying and tracking activists who are portrayed as "extremists." Individuals who have helped bring about changes in corporate policies, such as animal rights or environmental advocates, are labeled domestic terrorist threats by the FBI.

...

MORE: http://truth-out.org/news/item/18292-from-spying-on-terrorists-abroad-to-using-massive-surveillance-to-suppress-domestic-dissent-when-we-become-the-hunted#.UhU5L4gTrVo.facebook

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
From Spying on "Terrorists Abroad" to Suppressing Domestic Dissent: When We Become the Hunted (Original Post) Catherina Aug 2013 OP
Spot on. HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #1
"it's their imperative to focus on activists..." this explains the pro-NSA'ers... nashville_brook Aug 2013 #2
Trust me the thought has crossed my mind! snappyturtle Aug 2013 #4
Probably, like Republicans, they think by being conservative and authoritarian, they are Doctor_J Aug 2013 #10
most likely the case. nashville_brook Aug 2013 #11
That is a truly frightening article. The scope and capabilities snappyturtle Aug 2013 #3
political blackmail is certain under these circumstances... nashville_brook Aug 2013 #5
I really can't help myself; I think this is currently going on. snappyturtle Aug 2013 #6
"...in order to justify maintaining their budgets and their livelihoods." truebluegreen Aug 2013 #7
time to roll one nebenaube Aug 2013 #8
All they need is 30,000 Drones to patrol the National skies looking for "terr'ists." blkmusclmachine Aug 2013 #9
k/r marmar Aug 2013 #12
I wouldn't give two plugged nickels for the entire body of intelligence produced by profit-oriented indepat Aug 2013 #13
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
1. Spot on.
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 09:08 PM
Aug 2013

Proud to be the first rec. The bolded part of the bottom paragraph in OP is particularly important... "There are simply not enough terrorists in existence for the government to warrant the current level of intelligence spending." Therefore, the government will invent new classes of "terrorists" to justify spending levels.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
2. "it's their imperative to focus on activists..." this explains the pro-NSA'ers...
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 09:09 PM
Aug 2013

clearly don't see themselves as acting on, or advocating for any sort of progressive change.

not an activist...not a problem.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
10. Probably, like Republicans, they think by being conservative and authoritarian, they are
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 09:10 AM
Aug 2013

Last edited Thu Aug 22, 2013, 11:43 AM - Edit history (1)

exempting themselves from persecution. This may well be true (in Nazi Germany laws that were allegedly enacted to be enforced uniformly were invariably carried out more frequently against leftists). OTOH, "First they came for the Jews..."

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
3. That is a truly frightening article. The scope and capabilities
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 09:22 PM
Aug 2013

makes me fearful of the government and angry at the same
time. I found this following especially alarming:

But this "top secret" information is already being used by our own government for reasons that have little to do with combating threats to national security. Ownership of this information affords the administration unlimited power to suppress dissent, inhibit free speech and intimidate would-be critics into adhering to the status quo.

Stored data is vulnerable in the future as well. We cannot know now what activities the government may elect to stigmatize or criminalize years from now. Having access to stored data means that currently benign information may be assigned sinister meaning long after it was collected.

Recall that J. Edgar Hoover wielded enormous powerful because his FBI agents gathered information that he stored in secret dossiers on key politicians for nearly five decades. Presidents despised him but wouldn't fire him because he knew the intimate details of their personal and political lives and could use it to ruin their careers.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
5. political blackmail is certain under these circumstances...
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 09:31 PM
Aug 2013

and the people in charge of the data are for-profit businesses. it was bad enough as part of the govt with Hoover.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
7. "...in order to justify maintaining their budgets and their livelihoods."
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 09:41 PM
Aug 2013

Exactly like the MIC. And the militarized police. And the Drug Warriors. And the prison industry. All of these stupid and/or repressive policies are perpetuated to protect budgets and jobs.

And the horrible fact is, disaster will befall the US economy if we decide to slash the surveillance budget, the military budget, legalize marijuana....

indepat

(20,899 posts)
13. I wouldn't give two plugged nickels for the entire body of intelligence produced by profit-oriented
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 06:20 PM
Aug 2013

for-profit contractors. The whole sch-mere sorta smells of welfare for budding billionaires imo at a time Repugs want to cut food stamps, but continue generous subsidies for big oil.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»From Spying on "Terrorist...