From Spying on "Terrorists Abroad" to Suppressing Domestic Dissent: When We Become the Hunted
From Spying on "Terrorists Abroad" to Suppressing Domestic Dissent: When We Become the Hunted
...
Truthout recently spoke with Boghosian, executive director of the National Lawyers Guild, about the ever-expanding government/corporate surveillance state.
...
Heidi Boghosian: (...) Several other factors add to the urgency of this challenge: The Obama administration is on the defensive after Edward Snowden's disclosures and will likely invest even more resources to protect its perpetual "war on terror" campaign and the corporate partners that profit from this manufactured war. As the public, and certain legislators, express apprehension about mass surveillance, the executive branch and the NSA may enact more stringent measures to fortify and safeguard their highly sophisticated spying infrastructure.
On top of that, CEOs of telecommunications and defense companies such as Lockheed Martin, Verizon and Microsoft are allied with the administration, guiding telecommunications and anti-terrorism policies through the president's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee. And in addition to the lucrative business of data mining, corporations continue to adapt and refine technologies of war, from laser microphones to motion sensing capabilities, with which to monitor civilians.
...
We have created an entire new class of society that gathers and has access to classified information - an elite class that promises to grow as private companies seek increased revenue and as the government operates in unparalleled secrecy.
The majority of national intelligence, an astonishing 70 percent, is carried out by contractors. That translates into tens of thousands of analysts from more than 1,900 private firms who have performed intelligence functions over the past few years. Large contractors conduct most of the work, including Booz Allen Hamilton (which according to The New York Times, derived $1.3 billion in revenue from intelligence contracts), Northrop Grumman, L-3 Communications and Science Applications International Corporation (with 39,600 employees, a reported $11.17 billion in revenue as of 2013, and a recent $6.6 billion contract from the Defense Intelligence Agency).
In 2012, an estimated 1.1 million private contractors had security clearance. The number of federal employees with security clearance is 2.6 million.
...
Not only is it easy for the US and its contractors to focus on activists, it is imperative that they do so. They must target social advocates in order to justify maintaining their budgets and their livelihoods. There are simply not enough "terrorists" in existence for the government to warrant the current level of intelligence spending. As a result, enormous federal resources are devoted to identifying and tracking activists who are portrayed as "extremists." Individuals who have helped bring about changes in corporate policies, such as animal rights or environmental advocates, are labeled domestic terrorist threats by the FBI.
...
MORE: http://truth-out.org/news/item/18292-from-spying-on-terrorists-abroad-to-using-massive-surveillance-to-suppress-domestic-dissent-when-we-become-the-hunted#.UhU5L4gTrVo.facebook
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Proud to be the first rec. The bolded part of the bottom paragraph in OP is particularly important... "There are simply not enough terrorists in existence for the government to warrant the current level of intelligence spending." Therefore, the government will invent new classes of "terrorists" to justify spending levels.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)clearly don't see themselves as acting on, or advocating for any sort of progressive change.
not an activist...not a problem.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Last edited Thu Aug 22, 2013, 11:43 AM - Edit history (1)
exempting themselves from persecution. This may well be true (in Nazi Germany laws that were allegedly enacted to be enforced uniformly were invariably carried out more frequently against leftists). OTOH, "First they came for the Jews..."
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)!
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)makes me fearful of the government and angry at the same
time. I found this following especially alarming:
Stored data is vulnerable in the future as well. We cannot know now what activities the government may elect to stigmatize or criminalize years from now. Having access to stored data means that currently benign information may be assigned sinister meaning long after it was collected.
Recall that J. Edgar Hoover wielded enormous powerful because his FBI agents gathered information that he stored in secret dossiers on key politicians for nearly five decades. Presidents despised him but wouldn't fire him because he knew the intimate details of their personal and political lives and could use it to ruin their careers.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)and the people in charge of the data are for-profit businesses. it was bad enough as part of the govt with Hoover.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)Would explain a lot. imho
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Exactly like the MIC. And the militarized police. And the Drug Warriors. And the prison industry. All of these stupid and/or repressive policies are perpetuated to protect budgets and jobs.
And the horrible fact is, disaster will befall the US economy if we decide to slash the surveillance budget, the military budget, legalize marijuana....
nebenaube
(3,496 posts)and watch it crumble then...
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)I've seen the enemy. And he is us.
marmar
(77,080 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)for-profit contractors. The whole sch-mere sorta smells of welfare for budding billionaires imo at a time Repugs want to cut food stamps, but continue generous subsidies for big oil.