Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 06:36 PM Sep 2013

16 Major Firms May Have Received Early Data From Thomson Reuters, Matt Taibbi...

"Readers may recall an ugly story that broke earlier this summer, when New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman rebuked the news/business information firm Thomson Reuters for selling access to key economic survey data two seconds early to high-frequency algorithmic traders. The story strongly suggested that some Thomson Reuters customers were using their two-second head start (an eternity in the modern world of computerized trading) to front-run the markets.

"The early release of market-moving survey data undermines fair play in the markets," Schneiderman said, back in the second week of July. Thomson Reuters suspended the practice of selling two-second head starts after Schneiderman insisted upon a change. Still, the firm defiantly refused to declare the change permanent and insisted that it had the right to "legally distribute non-governmental data" to "fee-paying subscribers.""

snip

"Rosenblum, when he became aware of this practice, quickly became concerned that it was improper and perhaps violated federal securities laws. By May of 2012, Rosenblum began asking his superiors about the possibility that the practice violated rules. Over the course of the next few months, he claims, he was told in various ways to stop asking meddlesome questions, among other things being informed that his inquiries would affect his bonus, and that he was "sticking [his] nose where it does not belong."

To make a long story short, Rosenblum finally became frustrated in his efforts to get superiors to listen to his concerns, and went to the FBI on June 29th, 2012. A little over a month later, on August 3rd, 2012, he was fired."

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/16-major-firms-may-have-received-early-data-from-thomson-reuters-20130905

MUCH more to the story at the link. I guess 5 years isn't enough time to reign in the robber barons.


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
4. I would think that going to the FBI you would be "safe". Apparently not. This story could get
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 10:02 AM
Sep 2013

really interesting...
"The identity of these 16 firms has not been made public yet, but sources describe the firms as major financial institutions, many of them well-known to the general public. Their inclusion in this case would significantly expand the scope of the scandal.

Contacted by Rolling Stone today, the SEC declined to comment on the status of the case."

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
6. Federal prison - and not Danbury minimum security
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 11:31 AM
Sep 2013

Protective custody at Marion. Kick all of the non-violent drug possession inmates to make room.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»16 Major Firms May Have R...