Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Remarks by President Obama on Government Reform
[div style="text-align:center;"]The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
January 13, 2012
Remarks by the President on Government Reform
East Room
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
January 13, 2012
Remarks by the President on Government Reform
East Room
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning, everybody. Please have a seat.
Welcome to the White House. I see all sorts of small business people here, and I am thrilled to have you here. As small business owners, you know as well as anybody that if were going to rebuild an economy that lasts -- an economy that creates good, middle-class jobs -- then were all going to have to up our game.
The other day, I met with business leaders who are doing their part by insourcing -- by bringing jobs back to the United States. And I told them that if you are willing to keep asking yourselves what you can do to bring jobs back, then Ill make sure that youve got a government that helps you succeed.
And thats why were here today. I ran for office pledging to make our government leaner and smarter and more consumer-friendly. And from the moment I got here, I saw up close what many of you know to be true: The government we have is not the government that we need.
We live in a 21st century economy, but weve still got a government organized for the 20th century. Our economy has fundamentally changed -- as has the world -- but our government, our agencies, have not. The needs of our citizens have fundamentally changed but their government has not. Instead, it's often grown more complicated and sometimes more confusing.
Give you a few examples. There are five different entities dealing with housing. There are more than a dozen agencies dealing with food safety. My favorite example -- which I mentioned in last years State of the Union address -- as it turns out, the Interior Department is in charge of salmon in fresh water, but the Commerce Department handles them in saltwater. (Laughter.) If youre wondering what the genesis of this was, apparently, it had something to do with President Nixon being unhappy with his Interior Secretary for criticizing him about the Vietnam War. And so he decided not to put NOAA in what would have been a more sensible place.
No business or nonprofit leader would allow this kind of duplication or unnecessary complexity in their operations. You wouldnt do it when youre thinking about your businesses. So why is it okay for our government? Its not. It has to change.
Now, what weve tried to do over the first three years of my administration is to do a whole range of steps administratively to start making processes, procedures, agencies more consumer-friendly. But we need to do more, and we need authority to do more.
So today, Im calling on Congress to reinstate the authority that past presidents have had to streamline and reform the Executive Branch. This is the same sort of authority that every business owner has to make sure that his or her company keeps pace with the times. And let me be clear: I will only use this authority for reforms that result in more efficiency, better service and a leaner government.
Now, a little bit of history here. Congress first granted this authority to presidents in the midst of the Great Depression, so that they could swiftly reorganize the Executive Branch to respond to the changing needs of the American people and the immediate challenges of the Depression. For the next 52 years, presidents were able to streamline or consolidate the Executive Branch by submitting a proposal to Congress that was guaranteed a simple up or down vote.
In 1984, while Ronald Reagan was President, Congress stopped granting that authority.
And when this process was left to follow the usual congressional pace and procedures, not surprisingly, it bogged down. So congressional committees fought to protect their turf, and lobbyists fought to keep things the way they were because they were the only ones who could navigate the confusion. And because its always easier to add than to subtract in Washington, inertia prevented any real reform from happening. Layers kept getting added on and added on and added on. The Department of Homeland Security was created to consolidate intelligence and security agencies, but Congress didnt consolidate on its side. So now the Department of Homeland Security reports to over 100 different congressional panels. Thats a lot of paperwork. Thats a lot of reports to prepare. Thats not adding value, its not making us safer to file a whole bunch of reports all the time.
It has been a generation since a President had the authority to propose streamlining the government in a way that allowed for real change to take place. Imagine all the things that have happened since 1984. 1984 didnt have -- we didnt have the Internet, just to take one example. A generation of Americans has come of age. Landlines have turned into smartphones. The Cold War has given way to globalization. So much has happened -- and yet the government we have today is largely the government we had back then. And we deserve better.
Go talk to the skilled professionals in government who are serving their country -- and by the way, you wont meet harder-working folks than some of the folks in these federal agencies; devote countless hours to trying to make sure that theyre serving the American people. But they will tell you their efforts are constantly undermined by an outdated bureaucratic maze. And of course, if you go talk to ordinary Americans, including some of the small business leaders here today, theyll tell you that to deal with government on a regular basis is not always the highlight of their day. (Laughter.)
Over the past three years, as I said, weve tried to take some steps to fix the problem -- to bring our government into this century and, in doing so, to root out waste. So just to take some examples. We made sure that government sends checks to the right people in the right amount, which should be obvious, but weve been able to prevent $20 billion in waste over the last two years, just by making sure that checks are sent properly and were reducing error.
We cut government contracting for the first time in more than a decade. We cut a whole range of overlapping programs. We have tried to yank the federal government into the 21st century when it comes to technology and making everything we do a little more Web-friendly. And by the way, that also helps in terms of accountability and transparency, because the public can get on WhiteHouse.gov or the various other websites and they can see whats happening and track where money goes.
So weve done a lot, but weve got to do more. We need to think bigger. So today, Im outlining changes we could make if Congress gives the green light to allow us to modernize and streamline. These changes would help small business owners like you. It would also help medium and large businesses. And as a consequence, they would help create more jobs, sell more products overseas, grow our economy faster, improve our quality of life.
Right now, there are six departments and agencies focused primarily on business and trade in the federal government. Six. Commerce Department, Small Business Administration, the U.S. Trade Representatives office. In this case, six is not better than one. Sometimes more is better; this is not one of those cases, because it produces redundancy and inefficiency. With the authority that Im requesting today, we could consolidate them all into one department, with one website, one phone number, one mission: helping American businesses succeed. Thats a big idea. (Applause.)
Weve put a lot of thought into this. Over the past year, we spoke with folks across the government and across the country. And most importantly, we spoke with businesses -- including hundreds of small businesses -- to hear what works and what doesnt when you deal with the government. Whats frustrating, whats actually value added. And frankly, in those conversations, we found some unsatisfied customers. A lot of times what we heard was, you know what, the individual who Im working with was really helpful to me, but the process itself is too confusing. Most of the complaints werent about an unresponsive federal worker; they were about a system that was too much of a maze.
So take a look at this slide. I dont usually use props in my speeches -- (laughter) -- but I thought this was useful. This is the system that small business owners face. This is what they have to deal with if they want even the most basic answers to the most basic questions like how to export to a new country or whether they qualify for a loan. And by the way, this is actually simplified because there are some color codes. (Laughter.) The business owners dont get the blue and the purple -- and its all just -- theres a whole host of websites, all kinds of toll-free numbers, all sorts of customer service centers. But each are offering different assistance. Its a mess. This should be easy for small business owners. They want to concentrate on making products, creating services, selling to customers. Were supposed to make it easier for them. And we can. There are some tools that we can put in place that every day are helping small business owners all across the country, but were wasting too much time getting that help out. And if Congress would reinstate the authority that previous presidents have had, we would be able to fix this.
Wed have one department where entrepreneurs can go from the day they come up with an idea and need a patent, to the day they start building a product and need financing for a warehouse, to the day theyre ready to export and need help breaking into new markets overseas. One website, easy to use, clear. One department where all our trade agencies would work together to ensure businesses and workers can better export by better enforcing our trade agreements. One department dedicated to helping our businesses sell their products to the 95 percent of global consumers who live beyond our shores.
So with this authority, we could help businesses grow, save businesses time, save taxpayer dollars.
And this is just one example of what we could do. The contrast between this and this sums up what we could do on the business side, but these kinds of inefficiencies exist across government.
And theres a real opportunity right now for us to fundamentally rethink, reform and remake our government so that it can meet the demands of our time, so that its worthy of the American people, and so that it works.
This should not be a partisan issue. Congress needs to reinstate this authority that has in the past been given to Democratic and Republican presidents for decades. In the meantime, as long as folks are looking for work and small businesses are looking for customers, Im going to keep doing everything I can with my current authority to help.
So, to take one example, as of today, I am elevating the Small Business Administration to a Cabinet-level agency. (Applause.) Karen Mills, whos here today and whos been doing an outstanding job leading that agency, is going to make sure that small business owners have their own seat at the table in our Cabinet meetings.
In the coming weeks, were also going to unveil a new website -- Business USA. And this site will be a one-stop shop for small businesses and exporters, and it will consolidate information that right now is spread across all these various sites so that its all in one place and its easy to search.
So with or without Congress, Im going to keep at it. But it would be a lot easier if Congress helped. (Laughter.) This is an area that should receive bipartisan support, because making our government more responsive and strategic and leaner, it shouldnt be a partisan issue.
We can do this better. We can provide taxpayers better value. So much of the argument out there all the time is up in 40,000 feet, these abstract arguments about whos conservative or whos liberal. Most Americans, and certainly most small business owners, you guys are just trying to figure out, how do we make things work? How do we apply common sense? And thats what this is about.
So Im going to keep fighting every day to rebuild this economy so that hard work pays off, responsibility is rewarded, and weve got a government that is helping to create the foundation for the incredible energy and entrepreneurship that all of you represent. And Im going to keep fighting to make sure that middle-class families regain the security that theyve lost over the last decade. Ive said before, I believe this is a make-or-break moment for families who are trying to get in the middle class, folks who are trying to maintain their security, folks who are trying to start businesses. Theres enormous potential out there. The trendlines in our global economy are moving in our direction, towards innovation and openness and transparency.
But weve got to take advantage of it. And you need a strong ally in an effective, lean government. Thats what this authority can do.
Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you. (Applause.)
END
11:41 A.M. EST
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/01/13/remarks-president-government-reform
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 762 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remarks by President Obama on Government Reform (Original Post)
Tx4obama
Jan 2012
OP
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)1. Thanks Tx.
Met with some colleagues this even in downtown. Unfortunately we all unanimously agreed that this would be seen as an accomplishment for the President therefor Congress will find a way to kill it in some dirty bill.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)2. Here's a related article - some GOPers are warming up to the proposal
DU OP I posted earlier today: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002167022
Full article at HuffPo (includes names of and comments from republicans):
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/13/obama-smaller-government-plan-republicans_n_1205332.html