Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BethMomDem

(70 posts)
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:16 AM Oct 2013

Warren backs medical marijuana ‘with the right restrictions’

Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren (D) said Monday that she favors legalizing medical marijuana, provided the law has “the right restrictions” to prevent people who aren’t actually sick from getting the drug.

Speaking with Boston talk radio station WTKK-FM, Warren recalled holding her father’s hand as he died from cancer and explained “there was some conversation” about whether medical marijuana would have helped him.

“It puts me in a position to say, if there’s something a physician can prescribe that can help someone who is suffering, I am in favor of that,” she said. “I want to make sure they’ve got the right restrictions, it should be like getting any other prescription drug, that there’s careful control over it. But I think it’s really hard to watch someone suffer that you love.”

Voters in Massachusetts will decide whether to legalize medical marijuana on Election Day. Warren previously said she opposes outright legalization of marijuana.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/09/24/warren-backs-medical-marijuana-with-the-right-restrictions/
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren backs medical marijuana ‘with the right restrictions’ (Original Post) BethMomDem Oct 2013 OP
"to prevent people who aren’t actually sick from getting the drug" NoOneMan Oct 2013 #1
Exactly. It's not often I disagree with her. Warren should be for decriminalization. nt SunSeeker Oct 2013 #2
legalize it billhicks76 Oct 2013 #9
Yeahhhhh, dats what I shay....i'm juzht as zharp azh I evah wuz! Bill USA Oct 2013 #10
??? billhicks76 Oct 2013 #13
oh please, I picked him as he's well known. Weed is an equal opportunity drug. While I have known Bill USA Oct 2013 #14
'Dont know who they are'? That is roody Oct 2013 #15
1950s billhicks76 Oct 2013 #16
CD comics!! THAT's WHAT HAPPENED TO ME!!! Bill USA Oct 2013 #20
I guess I meant that their personalities seemed different..note this was not everybody, only a Bill USA Oct 2013 #22
That's mostly media bullshit. bemildred Oct 2013 #24
I must have totally confused by what I saw/experienced then, obviously Bill USA Oct 2013 #25
Clearly, one of us is confused. nt bemildred Nov 2013 #30
and peanuts. n/t Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #19
I am quite disappointed to be honest... Oldenuff Oct 2013 #18
Many people are still affected by old biases and outdated information. Voice for Peace Oct 2013 #28
That may well be... Oldenuff Nov 2013 #31
someone made the point downthread that this article is a year old Voice for Peace Nov 2013 #32
Hemp is not harmful. bemildred Oct 2013 #3
to be fair, I think today's cultivated varieties may be a lot stronger than what was around in Bill USA Oct 2013 #21
Oh it will make you stupid, but you'll get over it if you don't do anything else stupid. bemildred Oct 2013 #23
talking about toxicity is not the point. What is of concern is how will Bill USA Oct 2013 #26
many of these people, if good pot is not available, will drink, maybe then drive, or seek other Voice for Peace Nov 2013 #29
A lot of legal things will mess up your functioning in daily situations. So what? nt bemildred Nov 2013 #34
Prohibition encourages organized crime and criminalizes innumerable harmless citizens. nt tblue37 Oct 2013 #4
I think that you will find that Warren, like Obama, is more of a neo-liberal then a progressive. Sam1 Oct 2013 #5
I think all these labels are not helpful.. this isn't directed personally at you but just in general Voice for Peace Nov 2013 #33
NO! freebrew Oct 2013 #6
She's playing politics. HuckleB Oct 2013 #7
Yep, I'd say that too, if I had to run for office, it's dogma. bemildred Oct 2013 #8
+1 HuckleB Oct 2013 #12
A nice majority of Americans support legalizing marijuana, so her dated thinking is not Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #11
Too bad, she had an opportunity to lead on this issue. n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #17
Uh, the article in the OP is over a year old, what's DonViejo Oct 2013 #27
 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
1. "to prevent people who aren’t actually sick from getting the drug"
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:58 AM
Oct 2013

And what purpose would that serve?

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
9. legalize it
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 05:36 PM
Oct 2013

Its safer than caffienated soda, high fructose corn syrup, cigarettes, red meat, sugar, aspirin etc wtf

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
13. ???
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:56 PM
Oct 2013

Im not sure what this picture implies. Seems oddly racist. Does Flav even smoke weed? He doesn't rap about it. Many intelligent, creative, sharp people smoke marijuana. If you want to see a drug take a toll on the brain examine alcohol.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
14. oh please, I picked him as he's well known. Weed is an equal opportunity drug. While I have known
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 08:17 PM
Oct 2013

plenty of people who seem to handle it okay (although I don't think I'd want them flying a plane I was on or cashing my check), but others who don't know who they are, where they are or what they are doing when 'on' it.

.."Hey, look at that, is that cool...."

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
16. 1950s
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:25 PM
Oct 2013

In the 1950s they interviewed juvenile delinquents who were committing crimes. At the time there was an uproar from religious people over the content of comic books which often had political themes and horror/witchcraft stories which they wanted to stamp out. They asked these juveniles a number of questions and discovered that most of them had read comic books and, thus, according to their reasoning comic books caused crime and they needed to be censored. That is how the Comics Code Authority got established, censoring comics up through the 1990s. Never mind that those same kids all ate food, breathed air and attended school...it had to be the comics. The same reasoning that labeled comic book readers is used by many to label pot smokers. Let's face it, there are lots of stupid people out there but the majority of people under the age of 50 smoke pot and shouldn't be scapegoated...people are stupid on their own and in many cases marijuana would probably help them improve.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
22. I guess I meant that their personalities seemed different..note this was not everybody, only a
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 07:58 PM
Oct 2013

portion of all I've known. Not sure what the proportion was.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
24. That's mostly media bullshit.
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 06:13 AM
Oct 2013

If you go back to the 70s you will find that chic doperhood looks completely different:



And that was buillshit too.

 

Oldenuff

(582 posts)
18. I am quite disappointed to be honest...
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 01:13 AM
Oct 2013

I really thought Warren was smarter than this.It seems so many politicians either don't know what the heck they are talking about,or have another agenda (or master).

No offense,but if she isn't more educated on this topic than to make a statement like that,then I have reservations about her leadership abilities.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
28. Many people are still affected by old biases and outdated information.
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 09:38 PM
Oct 2013

But people like Obama and Warren evolve quickly,
because they are smart honest practical and open-minded.

 

Oldenuff

(582 posts)
31. That may well be...
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:57 AM
Nov 2013

but as people who profess the desire to lead,they should be listening to what their constituency is saying.Obviously they are not listening,and therefore should be discounted when it comes to serving in the public good.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
3. Hemp is not harmful.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:07 AM
Oct 2013

Use was unrestricted for thousands of years all over the world and nobody even noticed. You can't say that about alcohol or tobacco or much of anything else I can think of. They hate it because is it cheap and ubiquitous, and the only way to make a buck off it is to prohibit it or use it for rope.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
21. to be fair, I think today's cultivated varieties may be a lot stronger than what was around in
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 07:55 PM
Oct 2013

early days, ... them thar days....

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
23. Oh it will make you stupid, but you'll get over it if you don't do anything else stupid.
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 06:08 AM
Oct 2013

I mean you can eat it like a salad and nothing will happen. I can think of better salads though.

As with anything you ingest, dosage is everything as far as what the effects are. Too little you get nothing. Too much, you're sick or dead.

But hemp, as chemicals taken to get high or get well go, is amazingly non-toxic. Edit: in fact it's wierd that Anslinger settled on what is probably the least pernicious intoxicant people commonly use. All the rest will kill you if you overdo it, and some of them the difference betweed high and dead is not large.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
26. talking about toxicity is not the point. What is of concern is how will
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 07:21 PM
Oct 2013

people function in daily situations. I've seen many friends who weren't in any kind of shape to drive a car, fly a plane or just do there jobs. Fortunately, usually people are aware of this and just stay holed up somewhere - well, they're usually enjoying their reverie so much that they don't feel a need to go anywhere.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
29. many of these people, if good pot is not available, will drink, maybe then drive, or seek other
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 12:58 AM
Nov 2013

Last edited Fri Nov 1, 2013, 01:39 AM - Edit history (1)

self-medications that are more dangerous than
cannabis.

Many who smoke regularly function perfectly well.
Some can function normally for the first time.

One friend from a very poor ghetto told me that
it was only when he smoked pot that he could sit
and read a book. But every day when he walked
out his door to go to work, crack dealers greeted
him. Good cannabis wasn't available.

For many people who have lost the ability
to feel, or who are afraid to feel, or to look at
themselves; many who are deeply depressed
and unable to see beauty anywhere,
cannabis has enormous healing possibilities.

There's a small number of people who probably
should never use pot. I know first-hand it
can exaggerate or accentuate panic attacks or
hallucinations, IF a person is already on that
edge. If they're not, pot's unlikely to take you
there, my personal opnion. Pot is what took me
through the terrors, and out the other side.

Back in the 60's, my brother convinced my mother
to smoke some pot. For the first time since
we'd known her, she stopped talking.

She lay down on the couch & listened to Mozart
for a very long time. She said I have never heard
music this way before. Every note.

Pot is also both a diagnostic and educational
medicine, in my experience. Often under the
influence, a person can pinpoint the source of
their bodily pain or tension, or even of emotional
pain. It can also trigger profound emotional
release. It can naturally & spontaneously urge
the body and mind to do healing activities such
as dance, sing, move, breathe, stretch, eat, weep,
make art, and best-known effect of all, Laugh.

Cannabis can trigger insight, especially I think
into other people, our common humanity,
and of course a familiar joyful experience called
"don't worry be happy." As I'm sure you know,
happiness leads to all sorts of benefits, bodily
and otherwise.

Marijuana is a primarily a drug of peace, of
non violence, unlike alcohol or cocaine.
This is documented in more primitive societies
but I'm sorry I don't have a link on hand.

As far as people not knowing who they are,
under the influence of marijuana...?

I've been there many, many times. I love that
place.

Who am I? just me. alive, here, in this moment,
on an exquisite planet, breathing, feeling,
enjoying my existence.

My biggest reason for supporting pot, medical and
for recreation, is that it helps people rediscover
the normal attractions of childhood. The fascination
& appreciation of simple things. The creative and
playful. The silly.

We creatures on this planet are starving. Not for
food, but for fun.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
33. I think all these labels are not helpful.. this isn't directed personally at you but just in general
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:23 PM
Nov 2013

I think both Warren and Obama are extremely progressive,
though maybe not by the pc definitions.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
7. She's playing politics.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:42 PM
Oct 2013

The sad thing is that she has no choice if she wants to think about a higher office in the future. At least for now.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
8. Yep, I'd say that too, if I had to run for office, it's dogma.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:36 PM
Oct 2013


Edit: not that one would want to EVER encourage a politician to dissemble, of course ...
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
11. A nice majority of Americans support legalizing marijuana, so her dated thinking is not
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:33 PM
Oct 2013

going to win any votes she's not already have and could start reminding people she was a Republican for many years.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
27. Uh, the article in the OP is over a year old, what's
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 07:58 PM
Oct 2013

with the posting of it today? Warren's position is consistent with the position Massachusetts voters took on the day they elected her to the U.S. Senate.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Warren backs medical mari...