Doesn’t Eat, Doesn’t Pray and Doesn’t Love by Linda Greenhouse
The question of whether for-profit companies can claim a religious identity, one that exempts them from obeying a generally applicable law, is fully worthy of the attention the Supreme Court is about to give it. But to the extent that much of the commentary about the challenges to the Affordable Care Acts contraception-coverage insurance mandate frames the issue as a debate about the rights of corporations as a next step beyond Citizens Uniteds expansion of corporate free speech I think it misses the point. What really makes these cases so rich, and the reason the courts intervention will dramatically raise the temperature of the current term, lies elsewhere.
The religious-based challenges that have flooded the federal courts from coast to coast more than 70 of them, of which the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear two arent about the day-in, day-out stuff of jurisprudence under the First Amendments Free Exercise Clause: Sabbath observance, employment rights, tax exemptions. They are about sex.
As such, the cases open a new front in an old war. I dont mean the overblown war on religion that some Catholic leaders have accused the Obama administration of waging. Nor do I mean the war on women that was such an effective charge last year against a bevy of egregiously foot-in-mouth Republican politicians.
I mean that this is the culture war redux a war not on religion or on women but on modernity.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/28/opinion/greenhouse-doesnt-eat-doesnt-pray-and-doesnt-love.html?hp&rref=opinion