Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
mPower and B&W’s search for investors
http://knoxblogs.com/atomiccity/2014/01/14/mpower-bws-search-investors/
mPower and B&s search for investors
by Frank Munger January 14, 2014
When Babcock & Wilcox announced back in November that it was accelerating its hunt for more investors in its small, modular reactors program, some observers took that as a sign of trouble and wondered if lack of financing might be a hurdle too high to overcome for the mPower program.
During a sit-down interview last week with B&W Vice President Marshall Cohen, I asked him about the meaning of the companys elevated search for more money.
<snip>
The problem is, long-term, it requires more resources than the company can do, given the size of our company. Were a $5 billion market cap company (later he revised that to $3.8 billion). We cant bet the whole company on it. Weve put $350 milion-plus in it so far, and now is the time to look at bringing in other investors who can help going forward as we get to a point where, once that triggers, youve got to start construction . . . and making all that happen.
<snip>
Are there any new investors?
Not yet. Not yet.
<snip>
"Were working, as are others, to make sure the DOE grant money is continued by Congress. Because thats an important piece."
<snip>
mPower and B&s search for investors
by Frank Munger January 14, 2014
When Babcock & Wilcox announced back in November that it was accelerating its hunt for more investors in its small, modular reactors program, some observers took that as a sign of trouble and wondered if lack of financing might be a hurdle too high to overcome for the mPower program.
During a sit-down interview last week with B&W Vice President Marshall Cohen, I asked him about the meaning of the companys elevated search for more money.
<snip>
The problem is, long-term, it requires more resources than the company can do, given the size of our company. Were a $5 billion market cap company (later he revised that to $3.8 billion). We cant bet the whole company on it. Weve put $350 milion-plus in it so far, and now is the time to look at bringing in other investors who can help going forward as we get to a point where, once that triggers, youve got to start construction . . . and making all that happen.
<snip>
Are there any new investors?
Not yet. Not yet.
<snip>
"Were working, as are others, to make sure the DOE grant money is continued by Congress. Because thats an important piece."
<snip>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1016 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
mPower and B&W’s search for investors (Original Post)
bananas
Jan 2014
OP
bananas
(27,509 posts)1. DOE has already blown over $100 million on this turkey and plans to throw away more
http://www.babcock.com/news-room/Pages/U.S.-Department-of-Energy-Provides-Additional-Funding-to-Support-W-mPower-Project.aspx
U.S. Department of Energy Provides Additional Funding to Support B&W mPower Project
8/27/2013
<snip>
... the total DOE investment to $101 million during this initial project period. It is the intent of the DOE to provide additional funding to the project subject to incremental appropriations from Congress and B&W mPower's compliance with the terms of the agreement.
<snip>
U.S. Department of Energy Provides Additional Funding to Support B&W mPower Project
8/27/2013
<snip>
... the total DOE investment to $101 million during this initial project period. It is the intent of the DOE to provide additional funding to the project subject to incremental appropriations from Congress and B&W mPower's compliance with the terms of the agreement.
<snip>
bananas
(27,509 posts)2. DOE won the Golden Fleece Award for this boondoggle
http://www.taxpayer.net/media-center/article/watchdog-group-doe-support-for-small-modular-reactors-is-fleecing-taxpayers
Watchdog group: DOE support for small modular reactors is fleecing taxpayers
Original Publication: SNL Energy, February 27, 2013
<snip>
The group, Taxpayers for Common Sense, gave the DOE its "Golden Fleece Award" for the small modular reactor program, singling it out for what the group sees as particularly reckless spending.
<snip>
In 2012, the DOE awarded Generation mPower LLC, a joint effort between Babcock & Wilcox Co. and Bechtel Corp., with access to a $450 million funding opportunity to help license and develop the 180-MW small modular reactor, or SMR, it hopes to eventually install at a site owned by the Tennessee Valley Authority.
<snip>
Further government investment is worrisome for taxpayers, the group said, because SMRs may never be a cost-effective source of electricity. "In the Department of Energy's materials on SMRs, the agency argues there is a 'need and a market' in the United States for SMRs," a report released alongside the Golden Fleece Award said. "In reality, no one is clamoring to buy an SMR because there is no assurance the electricity will be remotely competitive with power from other sources."
<snip>
Watchdog group: DOE support for small modular reactors is fleecing taxpayers
Original Publication: SNL Energy, February 27, 2013
<snip>
The group, Taxpayers for Common Sense, gave the DOE its "Golden Fleece Award" for the small modular reactor program, singling it out for what the group sees as particularly reckless spending.
<snip>
In 2012, the DOE awarded Generation mPower LLC, a joint effort between Babcock & Wilcox Co. and Bechtel Corp., with access to a $450 million funding opportunity to help license and develop the 180-MW small modular reactor, or SMR, it hopes to eventually install at a site owned by the Tennessee Valley Authority.
<snip>
Further government investment is worrisome for taxpayers, the group said, because SMRs may never be a cost-effective source of electricity. "In the Department of Energy's materials on SMRs, the agency argues there is a 'need and a market' in the United States for SMRs," a report released alongside the Golden Fleece Award said. "In reality, no one is clamoring to buy an SMR because there is no assurance the electricity will be remotely competitive with power from other sources."
<snip>