Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,078 posts)
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 10:06 AM Jan 2014

Why Are Iraq and Afghanistan Not Looking After Themselves?


from truthdig:


Why Are Iraq and Afghanistan Not Looking After Themselves?

Posted on Jan 15, 2014
By William Pfaff


What more than a decade ago was believed by Americans to be the omnipotence of the United States in the Middle East and Central Asia (the “Greater Middle East” as the Bush administration called it) is today being replaced by a fear that the United States not only has decisively lost its power in the region, but is also responsible for why everything seems to be going wrong.

President Barack Obama is being accused by some Republican members of Congress of responsibility not only for the jihadist reconquest of the twice-martyred city of Fallujah in Iraq, but also for the jihadist resurgence elsewhere.

What did he do in Iraq? He did what the Bush administration had promised to do: leave Iraq. He fulfilled his own election campaign promise, made in 2008, to complete the withdrawal of American forces from Iraq and turn to Afghanistan.

The American military and the George W. Bush administration had set a nominally democratic but overwhelmingly Shiite government in Iraq. Mr. Obama is blamed for the fact that while the American command wanted to keep a security and training force of limited size in Iraq after the main withdrawal, the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, refused to accept this on the only terms that the Pentagon would agree. These were that American forces remaining in Iraq would enjoy extraterritorial legal status, which is to say that they would be accountable only to their own commanders for crimes or offenses under Iraqi law, and in addition would enjoy extraordinary anti-terrorist powers over Iraqi civilians (such as invading their homes in a search mission). The prime minister found this an affront to the new Iraq’s sovereignty. ........................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/why_are_iraq_and_afghanistan_not_looking_after_themselves_20140115



1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Are Iraq and Afghanistan Not Looking After Themselves? (Original Post) marmar Jan 2014 OP
First we need to help their leaders grow the Swiss bank accounts jsr Jan 2014 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Why Are Iraq and Afghanis...