Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,527 posts)
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 06:51 PM Jan 2014

Are you opposed to fracking? Then you might just be a terrorist

Are you opposed to fracking? Then you might just be a terrorist
By Nafeez Ahmed, The Guardian
Tuesday, January 21, 2014 16:08 EST

Over the last year, a mass of shocking evidence has emerged on the close ties between Western government spy agencies and giant energy companies, and their mutual interests in criminalising anti-fracking activists.

Activists tarred with the same brush

In late 2013, official documents obtained under freedom of information showed that Canada’s domestic spy agency, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), had ramped up its surveillance of activists opposed to the Northern Gateway pipeline project on ‘national security’ grounds. The CSIS also routinely passed information about such groups to the project’s corporate architect, Calgary-based energy company, Enbridge.

The Northern Gateway is an $8 billion project to transport oil from the Alberta tar sands to the British Columbia coast, where it can be shipped to global markets. According to the documents a Canadian federal agency, the National Energy Board, worked with CSIS and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to coordinate with Enbridge, TransCanada, and other energy corporations in gathering intelligence on anti-fracking activists – despite senior police privately admitting they “could not detect a direct or specific criminal threat.”

Now it has emerged that former cabinet minister Chuck Strahl – the man appointed by Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper to head up the CSIS’ civilian oversight panel, the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC) – has been lobbying for Enbridge since 2011.

More:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/21/are-you-opposed-to-fracking-then-you-might-just-be-a-terrorist/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are you opposed to fracking? Then you might just be a terrorist (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jan 2014 OP
OHHHH CANADA....... democratisphere Jan 2014 #1
It's not just Canada. enough Jan 2014 #2
This all sounds like a really horrific movie. Too bad it is so REAL! democratisphere Jan 2014 #4
Put me on the list Pakid Jan 2014 #3
You have the right to remain silent, blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #5
Recommend and it's in the AUMF Authorization, too! KoKo Jan 2014 #6

enough

(13,259 posts)
2. It's not just Canada.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 07:35 PM
Jan 2014

snip from the article>

Investigative journalist Steve Horn reports that TransCanada has also worked closely with American law-enforcement and intelligence agencies in attempting to criminalise US citizens opposed to the pipeline. Files obtained under freedom of information last summer showed that in training documents for the FBI and US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), TransCanada suggested that non-violent Keystone XL protestors could be deterred using criminal and anti-terror statutes:

“… the language in some of the documents is so vague that it could also ensnare journalists, researchers and academics, as well.”

According to the Earth Island Journal, official documents show that TransCanada “has established close ties with state and federal law enforcement agencies along the proposed pipeline route.” But TransCanada is only one example of “the revolving door between state law enforcement agencies and the private sector, especially in areas where fracking and pipeline construction have become big business.”

This has had a tangible impact. In March last year, US law enforcement officials had infiltrated and spied on environmentalists attending a tar sands resistance camp in Oklahoma, leading to the successful pre-emptive disruption of their protest action.

snip>

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Are you opposed to fracki...