Fascism and the Future, Part Two: The Totalitarian Center | John Michael Greer
Feb. 19, 2014 (Archdruid Report) -- As the first part of this series pointed out last week, theres an odd mismatch between the modern use of fascism as an all-purpose political snarl word, on the one hand, and the mediocrity of the regime that put the term into general use, on the other.
All things considered, as tyrants go, Benito Mussolini simply wasnt that impressive, and while the regime he cobbled together out of a bucket of spare ideological parts had many objectionable features, it cuts a pretty poor figure in the rogues gallery of authoritarian states. Lets face it, as an archetype of tyranny, Italian Fascismo just doesnt cut it.
For that matter, its far from obvious that theres enough common ground among the various European totalitarian movements between the wars to justify the use of a single label for them -- much less to make that label apply to tyrants and tyrannies around the world and throughout time. Historians in Europe and elsewhere thus spent a good deal of time in recent decades arguing about whether theres any such thing as fascism in general, and some very thoughtful writers ended up insisting that there isnt -- that more general words such as dictatorship cover the ground quite adequately, and the word fascism properly belongs to Mussolinis regime and that alone.
On the other side of the equation were those who argued that a certain kind of authoritarian movement in Europe between the wars was sufficiently distinct from other kinds of tyranny that it deserves its own label. One of those was Ernst Nolte, whose 1968 book Die Krise des liberalen Systems und die faschistischen Bewegungen (The Crisis of the Liberal System and the Fascist Movements) played a central role in launching the debate just mentioned. Nolte was careful enough not to propose a hard and fast definition of fascism, and offered instead a list of six features that any movement had to have to count as fascist. The first three of them are organizational features: a cult of charismatic leadership, a uniformed Party militia, and the goal of totalitarianism.
more
http://worldnewstrust.com/fascism-and-the-future-part-two-the-totalitarian-center-john-michael-greer