John Nichols: A Resounding Vote Against Koch Brothers Dollarocracy
http://www.thenation.com/blog/179178/resounding-vote-against-koch-brothers-dollarocracy?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=email_nation&utm_campaign=Email%20Nation%20-%2020140403&newsletter=email_nation_thursday###snip##
"On Tuesday, thirteen Wisconsin communities, urban and rural, liberal and conservative, Democratic-leaning and Republican-leaning answered the call of constitutional reform. Even as groups associated with billionaire donors Charles and David Koch were meddling in local elections in the state, voters were demanding, by overwhelming margins, that the right to organize fair and open elections be restored.
It even happened in Wisconsin Governor Scott Walkers hometown of Delavan, where voters faced the question:
Shall the City of Delavan adopt the following resolution:
RESOLVED, the City of Delavan, Wisconsin, calls for reclaiming democracy from the corrupting effects of undue corporate influence by amending the United States Constitution to establish that:
1. Only human beings, not corporations, unions, nonprofit organizations nor similar associations are entitled to constitutional rights, and
2. Money is not speech, and therefore regulating political contributions and spending is not equivalent to limiting political speech.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we hereby instruct our state and federal representatives to enact resolutions and legislation to advance this effort.
76 percent of the Delavan residents who went to the polls voted Yes!
##snip##
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Public financing is the only way to get the money out of politics. If we all concentrate on this one thing, we will get much in return. FIGHT!
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,112 posts)Please pass it on. It's simply brilliant.
RESOLVED, the City of Delavan, Wisconsin, calls for reclaiming democracy from the corrupting effects of undue corporate influence by amending the United States Constitution to establish that:
1. Only human beings, not corporations, unions, nonprofit organizations nor similar associations are entitled to constitutional rights, and
2. Money is not speech, and therefore regulating political contributions and spending is not equivalent to limiting political speech.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we hereby instruct our state and federal representatives to enact resolutions and legislation to advance this effort.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)Madam Mossfern
(2,340 posts)but does it have any clout? Even if every town in the United States passes a public question like this, does it have any legal power to overturn Citizens United or the most recent decision of the Supreme Court?
...or will it merely make people feel good without any real effect in facilitating the reversal of those rulings?
toby jo
(1,269 posts)Ownership of money and ownership of speech are 2 completely different arches of ownership with correspondingly different effects on society.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)......Move to Amend