Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,895 posts)
Tue May 27, 2014, 06:16 PM May 2014

by Robert Reich

I was asked this morning by a reporter for the BBC whether capitalism is doomed. Thomas Piketty’s data has fueled the debate (notwithstanding recent nit-picks) but the major reason for the question is the system is no longer delivering for most people. Capitalism works when markets are competitive, but we’re in the midst of a giant consolidation similar to that of the late 19th century. Look at Walmart's dominance over retailing; Comcast’s proposed acquisition of Time-Warner and AT&T’s of DirecTV and other wireless; Amazon’s predatory behavior toward publishers; the strangle-hold over finance by Wall Street’s five largest banks; the control of agriculture exercised by the four largest food processors; and the power of the five major drug companies to keep patents long after they were supposed to expire, and you see the pattern.

Antitrust law was supposed to prevent this sort of concentration, but Obama’s antitrust authorities (and W.'s before them) have been asleep at the wheel. This isn't the only reason for capitalism’s current crisis, of course, but it’s not helping. What's your view?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
by Robert Reich (Original Post) elleng May 2014 OP
K&R DJ13 May 2014 #1
fb elleng May 2014 #2
Thank you DJ13 May 2014 #3
Asleep at the wheel will result in disaster. Enthusiast May 2014 #4
Piketty is pointing out the dynamics of low growth capitalism. The dynamics aren't good Warren Stupidity May 2014 #5
Don't know if it will, elleng May 2014 #6
Allowing the already rich to accumulate larger stockpiles of wealth is destroying the world. fasttense May 2014 #7

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
4. Asleep at the wheel will result in disaster.
Tue May 27, 2014, 06:27 PM
May 2014

The too big to fail banks should be cut in half at least.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
5. Piketty is pointing out the dynamics of low growth capitalism. The dynamics aren't good
Tue May 27, 2014, 06:32 PM
May 2014

if you aren't in the 0.1%, in fact they are pretty horrible. Nit picking aside, is his assumption that low growth will dominate this century accurate? I think it is, for several reasons, including demographics, which will level off population growth, peak resources of various sorts, and catastrophic climate change.

elleng

(130,895 posts)
6. Don't know if it will,
Tue May 27, 2014, 06:39 PM
May 2014

but congressional repugs have been and continue to KILL us, with their refusals to allow us to improve infrastructure, etc etc etc.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
7. Allowing the already rich to accumulate larger stockpiles of wealth is destroying the world.
Tue May 27, 2014, 08:10 PM
May 2014

By taking away taxes that restricted the ever expanding wealth of the already wealthy, by not taxing the already wealthy as we tax the middle class and poor, by bailing out the already wealthy and giving them our tax dollars for just being rich, we have created monsters. These excessively wealth monsters are more destabilizing to an economy and a peaceful society than plagues, drought or famine. They should be taxed to death. They think they are gods and do any illegal, reckless, stupid, immoral or criminal thing that suits their fancy.

The uber rich were the ones who started WWI and they were the ones who funded Hitler and Mussolini. People like the Koch brothers and the bushes create hate and discontent and should be rid of their wealth and power.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»by Robert Reich