Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:22 PM Jan 2012

Vanity Fair February: The Dark Side of Mitt

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/02/mitt-romney-201202

Excerpt:
By 1983, Hayes was 23 and back in the Boston area, raising a 3-year-old daughter on her own and working as a nurse’s aide. Then she got pregnant again. Single motherhood was no picnic, but Hayes said she had wanted a second child and wasn’t upset at the news. “I kind of felt like I could do it,” she said. “And I wanted to.” By that point Mitt Romney, the man whose kids Hayes used to watch, was, as bishop of her ward, her church leader. But it didn’t feel so formal at first. She earned some money while she was pregnant organizing the Romneys’ basement. The Romneys also arranged for her to do odd jobs for other church members, who knew she needed the cash. “Mitt was really good to us. He did a lot for us,” Hayes said. Then Romney called Hayes one winter day and said he wanted to come over and talk. He arrived at her apartment in Somerville, a dense, largely working-class city just north of Boston. They chitchatted for a few minutes. Then Romney said something about the church’s adoption agency. Hayes initially thought she must have misunderstood. But Romney’s intent became apparent: he was urging her to give up her soon-to-be-born son for adoption, saying that was what the church wanted. Indeed, the church encourages adoption in cases where “a successful marriage is unlikely.”

Hayes was deeply insulted. She told him she would never surrender her child. Sure, her life wasn’t exactly the picture of Rockwellian harmony, but she felt she was on a path to stability. In that moment, she also felt intimidated. Here was Romney, who held great power as her church leader and was the head of a wealthy, prominent Belmont family, sitting in her gritty apartment making grave demands. “And then he says, ‘Well, this is what the church wants you to do, and if you don’t, then you could be excommunicated for failing to follow the leadership of the church,’ ” Hayes recalled. It was a serious threat. At that point Hayes still valued her place within the Mormon Church. “This is not playing around,” she said. “This is not like ‘You don’t get to take Communion.’ This is like ‘You will not be saved. You will never see the face of God.’ ” Romney would later deny that he had threatened Hayes with excommunication, but Hayes said his message was crystal clear: “Give up your son or give up your God.”
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vanity Fair February: The Dark Side of Mitt (Original Post) Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2012 OP
Kicked and recommended. TheWraith Jan 2012 #1
Truly, Bishop Willard gives me the creeps K8-EEE Jan 2012 #2
Different cults have different notions about this JNelson6563 Jan 2012 #3
That last comment was my initial take on it as well. Ruby the Liberal Jan 2012 #4
I agree about the "authoritarian" nature of the man. I had actually spotted Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2012 #5
creepy Sadie Thompson & Rev. Davidson feeling riverwalker Jan 2012 #6

K8-EEE

(15,667 posts)
2. Truly, Bishop Willard gives me the creeps
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:43 PM
Jan 2012

The has has a lot of power his whole life, being born into a wealthy, well connected family and part of an authoritarian church. He seems to me the type who is drunk with power, sure that the "right thing" is to impose HIS black and white "values" on everyone, and he should never ever be anywhere close to the Oval Office.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
3. Different cults have different notions about this
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:45 PM
Jan 2012

The Jehovah's Witnesses, on the other hand, would prefer the loyal member keep the child and raise him to also sell Watchtower publications (aka be a "good Witness&quot .

Funny how different cults have different views on this issue. I think much light will be shed on the Mormon church that they'd rather not be shining at all. Looking forward to it.

Julie

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
4. That last comment was my initial take on it as well.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 03:16 PM
Jan 2012

Yes, it was 30 years ago, but it speaks volumes to the authoritarian nature of not only Mittens himself, but the cult he belongs to.

I have a feeling that there is a lot about the LDS that is going to become part of the national dialogue for the first time, and they do have them some strange beliefs.

Should be interesting to see if the whole dominionism thing hits the MSM any time soon. The tenet that the LDS will take over the world as soon as their LDS-anointed leader takes over the secular leadership of the USA. That one should make for an interesting conversation.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
5. I agree about the "authoritarian" nature of the man. I had actually spotted
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 03:40 PM
Jan 2012

the behaviors of a very anal retentive one as well. He seems to get very
agitated when confronted and is hyper-defensive. It's like - someone
moved my cheese and I am upset.

Just this sentence about the family road trip from Boston to Ontario:
"Then Mitt put his sons on notice: there would be pre-determined stops for gas, and that was it."

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Vanity Fair February: Th...