Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Ezra Klein: Were the president’s advisers pushing him to do more or less?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/the-obama-administration-in-one-memo/2011/08/25/gIQACRZcLQ_blog.htmlWhat the Summers memo tells us about the Obama White House
Posted by Ezra Klein at 03:28 PM ET, 01/23/2012
Lizza's article:
The Obama Memos
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10169517
The economic policy memo that Larry Summers sent to Barack Obama in December 2008, and that the New Yorkers Ryan Lizza has posted in full, is the ur-text for the Obama administration. It contains the economic teams first thoughts on almost everything the White House would go on to do. It is, without doubt, the most authoritative guide we have to the way President Obamas first, and arguably most crucial, decisions were framed by his key policy staffers. And it has s reopened an old question about the Obama administration: Were the presidents advisers pushing him to do more or less?
snip//
But for all the attention given to the sentence on the bond market, the memo quickly moves onto other topics. Much more attention is paid to a different constraint: the operational constraints in trying to put so much money into the economy in a way that was both quick and smart. While the most effective stimulus is government investment, it is difficult to identify feasible spending projects on the scale that is needed to stabilize the macroeconomy. Moreover, there is a tension between the need to spend the money quickly and the desire to spend the money wisely. To get the package to the requisite size, and also to address other problems, we recommend combining it with substantial state fiscal relief and tax cuts for individuals and businesses.
The memo deals with this question in great detail, and concludes that we can only generate about $225 billion of actual spending on priority investments over the next two years. The rest of the money would have to come from state and local aid and tax cuts, and tax cuts, in particular, were a less effective form of stimulus.
The administration ultimately proposed a stimulus of nearly $900 billion, which the Senate later reduced to about $700 billion (the widely quoted $787 billion total includes the AMT patch, which was unrelated to the stimulus). In subsequent deals, the administration would get around $500 billion more in stimulus, for a total of $1.2-$1.3 trillion over three years.
There are other interesting revelations in the memo, too. For instance, it notes that Phil Schiliro, the incoming legislative director, thought the TARP brand was so badly damaged that the administration should consider repealing TARP and replacing it with a new program that we design and propose as part of the Economic Recovery program. That suggestions was never followed up on, but it makes for an interesting what-if.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 729 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ezra Klein: Were the president’s advisers pushing him to do more or less? (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jan 2012
OP
gateley
(62,683 posts)1. A late-to-the-party K&R! How did this sink? VERY interesting/important, IMO. Thanks!! nt