Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,879 posts)
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 08:27 PM Jul 2014

Walgreens shouldn’t have a say about how the U.S. government does anything.

by Robert Reich

Dozens of big U.S. corporations are considering leaving the United States in order to reduce their tax bills.

But they’ll be leaving the country only on paper. They’ll still do as much business in the U.S. as they were doing before.

The only difference is they’ll no longer be “American,” and won’t have to pay U.S. taxes on the profits they make.

Okay. But if they’re no longer American citizens, they should no longer be able to spend a penny influencing American politics.

Some background: We’ve been hearing for years from CEOs that American corporations are suffering under a larger tax burden than their foreign competitors. This is mostly rubbish.

It’s true that the official corporate tax rate of 39.1 percent, including state and local taxes, is the highest among members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

But the effective rate – what corporations actually pay after all deductions, tax credits, and other maneuvers – is far lower.

http://www.salon.com/2014/07/08/robert_reich_walgreen_shouldnt_have_a_say_about_how_the_u_s_government_does_anything_partner/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Walgreens shouldn’t have a say about how the U.S. government does anything. (Original Post) elleng Jul 2014 OP
If the sales are made in the U.S, taxes should be paid ohnoyoudidnt Jul 2014 #1
probably on purpose. redruddyred Jul 2014 #2
Let them go! But they should not be allowed to do business here! santamargarita Jul 2014 #3
This company grew up in the Chicago area.. Stuart G Jul 2014 #4
Would only make sense to HQ elsewhere if... mwooldri Jul 2014 #5

ohnoyoudidnt

(1,858 posts)
1. If the sales are made in the U.S, taxes should be paid
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 08:36 PM
Jul 2014

regardless of where the company is owned on paper. Our tax laws are so fucked.

Stuart G

(38,420 posts)
4. This company grew up in the Chicago area..
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 12:10 PM
Jul 2014

corporate is in Deerfield, Illinois. If it moves out of the USA, lots of people in this area will lose their jobs. I already know someone who has lost a job there, due to downsizing.

mwooldri

(10,303 posts)
5. Would only make sense to HQ elsewhere if...
Wed Jul 9, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jul 2014

...the majority of their business is done elsewhere.

A US company deciding to rearrange itself so that it becomes a PO Box Company in the Cayman Islands owning the American company really doesn't make sense.

Walgreen's situation does make more sense in that it is merging with a large European drugstore company... but this merger may not be the best for Walgreen's anyway, tax avoidance or not.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Walgreens shouldn’t have ...