Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
Sun Jul 13, 2014, 12:49 AM Jul 2014

The Georgians and the birth of celebrity and gossip news

http://blog.hrp.org.uk/hampton-court-palace/georgian-celebrity-and-gossip/

It’s thanks to parliamentary oversight that we have enjoyed a free, uncensored press in Britain. In 1679 they failed to renew the Licensing Act, or ‘The Act for preventing frequent Abuses in Printing Seditious, Treasonable and unlicensed Books and Pamphlets; and for the Regulating of Printing and Printing Presses’. After failed attempts at renewal of the act in the 1690s, printing presses were set up, plays were published, leaflets and papers were written feeding a public hungry for celebrity news and gossip.

This freedom was rare in Europe and visitors to Britain were shocked at a country where even the King and Queen did not “escape the lash of these satirical folks”.

The political cartoon soon became a national art form. William Hogarth, John Gillray, Thomas Rowlandson and George Cruikshank became masters of lampooning politicians and royals in pen and ink.

Certain journals and newspapers such as The Tatler and the Gentlemen’s Magazine published the comings and goings of royals and celebrities. Poets and essayists such as John Gay and Jonathan Swift wrote cheeky pieces criticizing politicians and nobles. Swift scathingly describes the children of noblemen as having the “same traditional sloth and luxury which render them both weak and effeminate”. More seriously, opposition politicians would publish anonymous pamphlets airing their grievances with the government.

As outlandish as the satirical artists and writers were, they had to be wary of being accused of libel or indeed treason. William Holland, one of the greatest publishers of political cartoons and pamphlets by political radicals, was imprisoned in 1793 for selling works by Thomas Paine, who had been convicted for his “seditious libel” against the monarch. George I took gossiping seriously: in 1716 he sacked his confectioner, Charles Burroughs, for using “indecent expressions concerning the King and Madam Kilmanseck [George I’s half-sister] such as are not fit to be inserted”.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Georgians and the bir...