Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,020 posts)
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 05:25 PM Jan 2014

50 Years After LBJ's "War on Poverty," a Call for a New Fight Against 21st Century Inequality



From Thursday's Democracy Now

http://www.democracynow.org - Fifty years ago this week, President Lyndon B. Johnson launched his "war on poverty," which led to many of the federal and state initiatives low-income Americans rely on today -- Medicaid, Medicare, subsidized housing, Head Start, legal services, nutrition assistance, raising the minimum wage, and later, food stamps and Pell grants. Five decades later, many say another war on poverty is needed. We are joined by Peter Edelman, author of "So Rich, So Poor: Why It's So Hard to End Poverty in America." A faculty director at the Center on Poverty, Inequality and Public Policy at Georgetown University, Edelman was a top adviser to Senator Robert F. Kennedy and a member of President Bill Clinton's administration until he resigned in protest after Clinton signed the 1996 welfare reform law that threw millions of people off the rolls. Transcript
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
50 Years After LBJ's "War on Poverty," a Call for a New Fight Against 21st Century Inequality (Original Post) alp227 Jan 2014 OP
An answer to why it's so hard to end poverty in America packman Jan 2014 #1
their federal funds should be cut off Doctor_J Jan 2014 #3
Letter from Senator Bernie Sanders mc51tc Jan 2014 #2
 

packman

(16,296 posts)
1. An answer to why it's so hard to end poverty in America
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 08:20 PM
Jan 2014

Republican States have the worst Poverty. The States with the worst poverty are Red States:

1. Mississippi.....21.9%...........Red
2. Arkansas........18.8%...........Red
3. Kentucky........18.6%...........Red
4. New-Mexico......18.0%...........Blue
5. West-Virginia...17.7%...........Red
6. Alabama.........17.5%...........Red
7. Louisiana.......17.3%...........Red
8. Texas...........17.2%...........Red
9. South.Carolina..17.1%...........Red
10. Tennessee.......17.1%...........Red
11. Arizona.........16.5%...........Red
12. Georgia.........16.5%...........Red
13. North-Carolina..16.3%...........Red

http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acsbr09-1.pdf

Well, as long as they have Duck Dynasty to watch- and these states get more back from the US government than they pay in.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
3. their federal funds should be cut off
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 12:05 AM
Jan 2014

They continue to elect anti government crazies, and thus should not expect any money from the big bad government

mc51tc

(219 posts)
2. Letter from Senator Bernie Sanders
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 11:48 PM
Jan 2014

Letter from Senator Bernie Sanders regarding LBJ`s War On Poverty results 50 years later:

War on Poverty
Fifty years ago, President Lyndon Johnson spoke before Congress and declared a War on Poverty. Out of that speech came a series of programs that transformed America and made life better for millions of our fellow citizens.

Out of that speech came Medicare, a government health insurance program for senior citizens – which is now one of the most popular and important federal programs in existence. Through Medicare, Americans are guaranteed health care when they age – when they need it the most. What an extraordinary impact this has had for our country!

Out of that speech came Medicaid, which provides health care to some 72 million low-income people and their kids. Nobody can give an exact number as to how many lives Medicaid has saved, and how much suffering has been eased, but that number is very, very high.

Out of that speech and the war on poverty came food stamps – a concept which said that nobody - no man, woman or child in the United States - should go hungry. At a time of high unemployment food stamps are playing an increasingly important role in helping lower-income Americans live with a modicum of dignity.

Out of that speech came Head Start, which addressed the profound reality that quality early childhood education was vital if lower-income kids were to do well in school and move their way up from poverty.

Out of that speech came the concept of community health centers – democratically and community run primary health care facilities, which today provide high-quality health and dental care, mental health counselling and low cost prescription drugs for more than 20 million Americans.

Out of that speech 50 years ago came the Older Americans Act, which focused a spotlight on the particular needs of vulnerable seniors and began such programs as Meals on Wheels and the congregate meal program.

These are just some of the advances made under the war on poverty initiated by President Lyndon B. Johnson.

When Johnson inaugurated these programs, the overall poverty rate in America was over 19.5 percent – despite the relatively strong economy of the mid-1960s. Today, despite a struggling economy caused by the Wall Street crash of 2008, the poverty rate is 15 percent, way too high but lower than it was in 1964.

Let’s be clear, it is a national disgrace that 46.5 million Americans are living in poverty today, the largest number on record. It is a national disgrace that at 21.8 percent, the U.S. has the highest childhood poverty rate of any major country on earth.

But without the current social safety net which was largely established as a result of the War on Poverty and the New Deal, economists have told us that the poverty rate would be 29 percent - almost twice as high as it is today.

Progress has been made, but the U.S. continues to lag behind many other countries in terms of reducing poverty and income and wealth inequality. Countries like Finland, Denmark, Norway, Germany and Sweden have much lower poverty rates than we do because they invest more in their citizens, especially their kids. They invest in quality childcare, education and job training for their young people. College is free. Health care for everyone is a right of citizenship.

Here in the United States, significant progress has been made but much more needs to be done to provide dignity and opportunity to all Americans regardless of income.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»50 Years After LBJ's &quo...