Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumBan Avoidance: Custom-made guns evade US arms control laws
RT · Published on Apr 19, 2014
Gun enthusiasts in New York have lost their latest bid to repeal the state's gun control laws. Stringent measures were passed in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook school shooting in 2012. Gun manufacturers have again, found a way around them...
RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air
Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/rt
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT
Jgarrick
(521 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)The heckl with them and the sickos that buy that junk.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Maybe .22 even? Pistol rounds, not rifle rounds. That does make a difference.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts).223 just about the size of a .22, larger case size. Same rate of fire. Thank goodness it is not a scary assault weapon.
A=.22LR
B=.223 Rifle
I think you are right in the video, so here is another compliant rifle in the correct caliber. 5.56 and also one in 7.62.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 19, 2014, 09:33 PM - Edit history (1)
If two projectiles have the same diameter, but one has twice the mass (due to length), and is moving twice as fast (due how much gunpowder got it moving in the first place), which do you think has the potential to do more damage?
Thanks for proving you aren't here for an honest debate, by the way
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)That there is a market for rifles and it will be filled with legal variants of the same rifle that is trying to be banned? Would you like to start banning rifle ammunition in specific calibers?
Jgarrick
(521 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Just ban all future sales/purchases of semi-auto rifles or handguns that a typical Yahoo is likely to drool over.
After the recent terrorist standoff in Nevada, time to put a damper on gun sales and pass laws like that enacted in Australia in 1996.
Jgarrick
(521 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Jgarrick
(521 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Poor pitiful souls.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)just about as fast
Jgarrick
(521 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Good thing, it does kind of look scary and it is black
Here is another from the gun friendly Australia. I guess they did not ban all rifles.
Jgarrick
(521 posts)definition. Again.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)"spirit of the law"?
This is why laws are written with words and words have meanings and the manufacturer followed those words. They followed the law.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Poor little selves. I guess that "gun owners are law abiding" is just BS.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)The weapon in fact is legal and NY SAFE compliant so yes they are following the law.
Jgarrick
(521 posts)how is he not law-abiding?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)The vast majority of folks aren't into to guns and self-defense as you guys. Illegal or immoral, pretty much the same thing in this case. Unfortunately, the Zimmerman types get to walk free among us.
Jgarrick
(521 posts)by flying their flag? You must be a parody of a gun control advocate...this can't be for real!
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)But I will fight for the first amendment right of those people to have that right. I assume you are all for free speech zones also. Even the ACLU fights for those rights. What other rights are you willing to give up, maybe it will be your free speech rights that will be trampled.
https://www.aclu.org/free-speech/aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie
Diremoon
(86 posts)1. No democratic candidate running for office should ever mention restricting guns. Period. Guaranteed to settle the issue, not in their favor.
2. It appears that whenever people who know nothing about guns try to write legislation about them, they always focus on the wrong aspects, thereby making themselves look foolish, and their laws ridiculous.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Thanks for posting the truth about the right-wing gun lobby...
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Well, yes.
Which kind of undermines the merit of an assault rifle ban, doesn't it?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)to here that also
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)good comeback sir
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I'm fine with effective gun control legislation, and even a cursory search of my posting history would show it. DC vs Heller was an outrage.
AW bans are all about the cosmetics.