Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 04:49 PM Apr 2014

Ban Avoidance: Custom-made guns evade US arms control laws



RT · Published on Apr 19, 2014

Gun enthusiasts in New York have lost their latest bid to repeal the state's gun control laws. Stringent measures were passed in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook school shooting in 2012. Gun manufacturers have again, found a way around them...

RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air

Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/rt
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ban Avoidance: Custom-made guns evade US arms control laws (Original Post) DeSwiss Apr 2014 OP
The headline is false. The manufacturers are following the law to the letter. Jgarrick Apr 2014 #1
They and gun fanciers they feed, sure wouldn't understand "spirit" of the law. Hoyt Apr 2014 #4
The magazine on the "New, but what's the difference" gun looks much smaller caliber. Electric Monk Apr 2014 #2
same round Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #8
re: .22 vs .223, do I really need to explain the concept of kinetic energy to you? Electric Monk Apr 2014 #14
yep, any round can kill Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #16
Thanks again for demonstrating again how you aren't really here for an honest open discussion. nt Electric Monk Apr 2014 #35
and what would you like to discuss? Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #36
I found that odd as well. Jgarrick Apr 2014 #10
Gun manufacturers and the crowd they feed don't understand spirit of law. Hoyt Apr 2014 #3
Ban all semi-autos? Good luck with that...! Jgarrick Apr 2014 #5
Hilarious. Ed Suspicious Apr 2014 #6
That someone would seriously entertain the notion that it's remotely possible? You bet! Jgarrick Apr 2014 #11
That would have gun fanciers puckering all over America. Hoyt Apr 2014 #7
just go with pump action Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #12
Not to mention the Troy Pump Action Sporting Rifle. Jgarrick Apr 2014 #13
thats not an assault weapon Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #18
Exactly so. A pump-action rifle isn't an "assault weapon" by definition. Unless they change the Jgarrick Apr 2014 #20
moving the goalposts Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #21
how do you enforce Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #9
+1 Jgarrick Apr 2014 #15
Well you have a point since gun fanciers appear to care little for society, just their Hoyt Apr 2014 #23
cue the thought police Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #26
If a gun owner purchases a rifle that is legal for him to own, Jgarrick Apr 2014 #28
It's legal to fly a confederate, nazi, or Gadsden flag. But it's immoral. Hoyt Apr 2014 #29
You think legally buying a rifle is on the same moral plane as advocating for the Nazi Party Jgarrick Apr 2014 #32
Assault style rifles are most often acquired by right/white wing bigots. Hoyt Apr 2014 #42
I would not agree with those Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #33
Thought Diremoon Apr 2014 #17
Maybe if the NRA and other gun promoters stayed out of the process, it would work better. Hoyt Apr 2014 #43
K&R billh58 Apr 2014 #19
De nada. DeSwiss Apr 2014 #34
"So with a few cosmetic changes... is no longer an assault rifle" lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #22
It's not the rifle per se, it's the yahoos attracted to them. Hoyt Apr 2014 #24
If you have a legislative solution to that in mind, I'm all ears. n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #25
I am curious Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #27
No you aren't. You are a gun promoter. Hoyt Apr 2014 #30
that got him Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #31
Actually, I'm not. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #37
And anybody attracted to those cosmetics is too sick to own a gun. Hoyt Apr 2014 #38
There's a circular nature to this conversation. n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #39
You got it, and right in the middle are irrational gun loving yahoos who are a blight on society. Hoyt Apr 2014 #40
Thought crime! Jgarrick Apr 2014 #41
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
4. They and gun fanciers they feed, sure wouldn't understand "spirit" of the law.
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 05:28 PM
Apr 2014

The heckl with them and the sickos that buy that junk.

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
2. The magazine on the "New, but what's the difference" gun looks much smaller caliber.
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 05:24 PM
Apr 2014

Maybe .22 even? Pistol rounds, not rifle rounds. That does make a difference.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
8. same round
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 05:38 PM
Apr 2014

.223 just about the size of a .22, larger case size. Same rate of fire. Thank goodness it is not a scary assault weapon.


A=.22LR
B=.223 Rifle

I think you are right in the video, so here is another compliant rifle in the correct caliber. 5.56 and also one in 7.62.

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
14. re: .22 vs .223, do I really need to explain the concept of kinetic energy to you?
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 06:04 PM
Apr 2014

Last edited Sat Apr 19, 2014, 09:33 PM - Edit history (1)

If two projectiles have the same diameter, but one has twice the mass (due to length), and is moving twice as fast (due how much gunpowder got it moving in the first place), which do you think has the potential to do more damage?


Thanks for proving you aren't here for an honest debate, by the way

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
36. and what would you like to discuss?
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 09:38 PM
Apr 2014

That there is a market for rifles and it will be filled with legal variants of the same rifle that is trying to be banned? Would you like to start banning rifle ammunition in specific calibers?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. Gun manufacturers and the crowd they feed don't understand spirit of law.
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 05:25 PM
Apr 2014

Just ban all future sales/purchases of semi-auto rifles or handguns that a typical Yahoo is likely to drool over.

After the recent terrorist standoff in Nevada, time to put a damper on gun sales and pass laws like that enacted in Australia in 1996.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
18. thats not an assault weapon
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 06:18 PM
Apr 2014

Good thing, it does kind of look scary and it is black

Here is another from the gun friendly Australia. I guess they did not ban all rifles.

 

Jgarrick

(521 posts)
20. Exactly so. A pump-action rifle isn't an "assault weapon" by definition. Unless they change the
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 06:48 PM
Apr 2014

definition. Again.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
9. how do you enforce
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 05:40 PM
Apr 2014

"spirit of the law"?

This is why laws are written with words and words have meanings and the manufacturer followed those words. They followed the law.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
23. Well you have a point since gun fanciers appear to care little for society, just their
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 07:00 PM
Apr 2014

Poor little selves. I guess that "gun owners are law abiding" is just BS.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
26. cue the thought police
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 07:08 PM
Apr 2014

The weapon in fact is legal and NY SAFE compliant so yes they are following the law.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
29. It's legal to fly a confederate, nazi, or Gadsden flag. But it's immoral.
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 07:52 PM
Apr 2014

The vast majority of folks aren't into to guns and self-defense as you guys. Illegal or immoral, pretty much the same thing in this case. Unfortunately, the Zimmerman types get to walk free among us.

 

Jgarrick

(521 posts)
32. You think legally buying a rifle is on the same moral plane as advocating for the Nazi Party
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 08:00 PM
Apr 2014

by flying their flag? You must be a parody of a gun control advocate...this can't be for real!

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
33. I would not agree with those
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 08:17 PM
Apr 2014

But I will fight for the first amendment right of those people to have that right. I assume you are all for free speech zones also. Even the ACLU fights for those rights. What other rights are you willing to give up, maybe it will be your free speech rights that will be trampled.

In 1978, the ACLU took a controversial stand for free speech by defending a neo-Nazi group that wanted to march through the Chicago suburb of Skokie , where many Holocaust survivors lived. The notoriety of the case caused some ACLU members to resign, but to many others the case has come to represent the ACLU's unwavering commitment to principle.


https://www.aclu.org/free-speech/aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie

Diremoon

(86 posts)
17. Thought
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 06:15 PM
Apr 2014

1. No democratic candidate running for office should ever mention restricting guns. Period. Guaranteed to settle the issue, not in their favor.
2. It appears that whenever people who know nothing about guns try to write legislation about them, they always focus on the wrong aspects, thereby making themselves look foolish, and their laws ridiculous.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
22. "So with a few cosmetic changes... is no longer an assault rifle"
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 06:59 PM
Apr 2014

Well, yes.

Which kind of undermines the merit of an assault rifle ban, doesn't it?

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
37. Actually, I'm not.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 11:04 AM
Apr 2014

I'm fine with effective gun control legislation, and even a cursory search of my posting history would show it. DC vs Heller was an outrage.

AW bans are all about the cosmetics.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
40. You got it, and right in the middle are irrational gun loving yahoos who are a blight on society.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 12:02 PM
Apr 2014
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Ban Avoidance: Custom-mad...