Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum"11 Year Old Hospitalized With Severe Burns Attempting The Fire Challenge"
&list=UUKZGcrxRAhdUi58Mdr565mwHelen Borg
(3,963 posts)That's what you get for not studying a bit of biology and chemistry in school!
RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,315 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)As far as I'm concerned, this is natural selection in action.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Unless there are multiple cases...
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)This is very disturbing.
littlemissmartypants
(22,594 posts)CSStrowbridge
(267 posts)This is a future Darwin Award winner right here. How dumb do you have to be to not understand "Fire bad."?
packman
(16,296 posts)But, I remember way back when getting new sweat socks and - while wearing them- burning the fuzz off them with a bic lighter. Kinda cool seeing that little fire ring going around the sock. Then again, when you're young you think you are immortal.
mackerel
(4,412 posts)11 year old children don't always make the best decisions.
tblue37
(65,227 posts)a couple of minutes alone for a kid to do something dangerous.
The trick is to teach them well enough before they are 11 to help them resist the temptation to do something like this.
As for "Where were the parents"--well, they could have been working, cooking dinner, taking care of the younger kids in the family, taking a nap after working two shifts, etc. You can't follow your 11-year-old around and watch everything he does every minute of every day.
The only way "Where were the parents" is relevant is in the sense that his parents should have trained him well enough about safety before he turned 11 for him to fully understand how nuts it would be to douse himself in a flammable liquid and set himself on fire. They also should have had much more control over his internet access, of course, but I have encountered all too many parents who are just plain clueless about what sort of access their kids have and about what is actually available online.
And a lot of those parents are clueless about and not in control of such things because they are working so much and so hard just to provide the basics for their families.
valerief
(53,235 posts)tblue37
(65,227 posts)"If all your friends were jumping off a cliff, would you do it, too?"
Apparently, as long as the "cliff-jumping challenge" was being passed around on the internet, they would.
tblue37
(65,227 posts)One thing I noticed is that a lot of the ones that go really, really bad differ from the ones that don't cause serious injury mainly in terms of the amount of the flammable liquid the person spreads on himself and the size of the area the flammable substance is spread over.
The one used as an example in the OP video, the one in which the boy is standing in the bathtub, is a particularly awful one. That boy spreads hand sanitizer all over his torso, pretty much everywhere. Then, when his whole upper body goes up in flames, it takes quite a lot of time before his friends can get the flames stamped out.
If, like the less extreme ones, he had just put a small dab of flammable stuff on his body, it would still be stupid and dangerous as hell, but he would not have had his entire upper body go up in flames the way he did.
Even as I watched that horrifying video of the boy in the bathtub, I was thinking he was actually much luckier than it seems, because he could easily have been more severely injured or even killed. Thank goodness his hair didn't catch on fire, because it easily could have. It was long enough for the flames or at least a spark to reach it, and especially if he had any sort of hair product on it, even the tiniest spark could have sent his whole head up in flames!
jmowreader
(50,530 posts)Let's get this straight: Smoking one joint of weed is Bad, m'kay...but setting yourself on fire is Cool? How about we send the cops to schools to tell kids not to do stupid shit like this?