Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"11 Year Old Hospitalized With Severe Burns Attempting The Fire Challenge" (Original Post) Jamaal510 Aug 2014 OP
What a moron... Helen Borg Aug 2014 #1
Yeah. Because he's eleven. RadiationTherapy Aug 2014 #2
I have a five year old nephew that warns ME not to touch hot things. Hassin Bin Sober Aug 2014 #7
Even at the age of 11, I knew that setting myself on fire was unwise... backscatter712 Aug 2014 #9
16, not 11 Helen Borg Aug 2014 #14
I was severely burned when I was 5 and have notable keloided scars. Shrike47 Aug 2014 #3
Unsupervised innertubes. eom littlemissmartypants Aug 2014 #4
Darwin Awards CSStrowbridge Aug 2014 #5
Speechless- How Dumb do you have to be? packman Aug 2014 #6
Again I ask, Where were the parents? mackerel Aug 2014 #8
An 11-year-old cannot be watched every minute, and it takes only tblue37 Aug 2014 #12
Should be renamed "Herd Thinning Challenge." nt valerief Aug 2014 #10
Remember when parents used to say to kids whining about being told no, tblue37 Aug 2014 #11
I checked out some of the videos of this challenge on "Know Your Meme." tblue37 Aug 2014 #13
We need to replace DARE with SSRE jmowreader Aug 2014 #15

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
9. Even at the age of 11, I knew that setting myself on fire was unwise...
Sat Aug 2, 2014, 01:24 PM
Aug 2014

As far as I'm concerned, this is natural selection in action.

CSStrowbridge

(267 posts)
5. Darwin Awards
Sat Aug 2, 2014, 09:35 AM
Aug 2014

This is a future Darwin Award winner right here. How dumb do you have to be to not understand "Fire bad."?

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
6. Speechless- How Dumb do you have to be?
Sat Aug 2, 2014, 11:04 AM
Aug 2014

But, I remember way back when getting new sweat socks and - while wearing them- burning the fuzz off them with a bic lighter. Kinda cool seeing that little fire ring going around the sock. Then again, when you're young you think you are immortal.

tblue37

(65,227 posts)
12. An 11-year-old cannot be watched every minute, and it takes only
Sat Aug 2, 2014, 03:22 PM
Aug 2014

a couple of minutes alone for a kid to do something dangerous.

The trick is to teach them well enough before they are 11 to help them resist the temptation to do something like this.

As for "Where were the parents"--well, they could have been working, cooking dinner, taking care of the younger kids in the family, taking a nap after working two shifts, etc. You can't follow your 11-year-old around and watch everything he does every minute of every day.

The only way "Where were the parents" is relevant is in the sense that his parents should have trained him well enough about safety before he turned 11 for him to fully understand how nuts it would be to douse himself in a flammable liquid and set himself on fire. They also should have had much more control over his internet access, of course, but I have encountered all too many parents who are just plain clueless about what sort of access their kids have and about what is actually available online.

And a lot of those parents are clueless about and not in control of such things because they are working so much and so hard just to provide the basics for their families.

tblue37

(65,227 posts)
11. Remember when parents used to say to kids whining about being told no,
Sat Aug 2, 2014, 03:15 PM
Aug 2014

"If all your friends were jumping off a cliff, would you do it, too?"

Apparently, as long as the "cliff-jumping challenge" was being passed around on the internet, they would.

tblue37

(65,227 posts)
13. I checked out some of the videos of this challenge on "Know Your Meme."
Sat Aug 2, 2014, 03:44 PM
Aug 2014

One thing I noticed is that a lot of the ones that go really, really bad differ from the ones that don't cause serious injury mainly in terms of the amount of the flammable liquid the person spreads on himself and the size of the area the flammable substance is spread over.

The one used as an example in the OP video, the one in which the boy is standing in the bathtub, is a particularly awful one. That boy spreads hand sanitizer all over his torso, pretty much everywhere. Then, when his whole upper body goes up in flames, it takes quite a lot of time before his friends can get the flames stamped out.

If, like the less extreme ones, he had just put a small dab of flammable stuff on his body, it would still be stupid and dangerous as hell, but he would not have had his entire upper body go up in flames the way he did.

Even as I watched that horrifying video of the boy in the bathtub, I was thinking he was actually much luckier than it seems, because he could easily have been more severely injured or even killed. Thank goodness his hair didn't catch on fire, because it easily could have. It was long enough for the flames or at least a spark to reach it, and especially if he had any sort of hair product on it, even the tiniest spark could have sent his whole head up in flames!

jmowreader

(50,530 posts)
15. We need to replace DARE with SSRE
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 02:35 AM
Aug 2014

Let's get this straight: Smoking one joint of weed is Bad, m'kay...but setting yourself on fire is Cool? How about we send the cops to schools to tell kids not to do stupid shit like this?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»"11 Year Old Hospita...