Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumStephen Harper and Aussie PM John Howard give SAME SPEECH
(At the time) Canadian Opposition Leader Stephen Harper and Australian Prime Mninister John Howard gave almost identical speeches word-for-word a couple of days apart on the eve of the Iraq invasion in 2003.
It's BS and a dishonest edit. These sentences refer to resolutions and a very specific situation, so of course they're going to be similar. So what? Some massive Star Chamber conspiracy?
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)and it worked.
uhnope
(6,419 posts)Who wrote the speech for two different politicians on two different continents, and how did they transmit it? What is the power behind this conspiracy? Who secretly rules the world?
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)uhnope
(6,419 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)They're known facts.
As for the video, someone in the Bush administration probably wrote the speech for these two stooges.
uhnope
(6,419 posts)Also, does that mean Bush is the leader of the conspiracy, or someone else? (Or does Bush still run it from his house in Texas?)
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)was a "conspiracy".
Stephen Harper and Tony Abbott (the new Aussie PM) are neocon stooges because they spout RW talking points. That's just my opinion. You may agree or disagree but probably many on DU would agree with that point of view.
As for Bush, he's retired now and painting portraits of dogs and whatever else he finds interesting.
Wibly
(613 posts)More than likely the PM, Harper, heard it, decided he liked it, and took it for himself.
He actually believed, back over a decade ago when this speech was given, we, Canadians, were too stupid to find out he'd swiped it.
We caught it right away, and gave hims looks of derision for six months.
Then he just buried it in a whole lot of other bad crap he's done, and we've pret' nearly forgotten about his speech writing techniques.
Got to say tho', DU is not inspiring anything but derision from Canadians for resurrecting this old dead piece of fish. Harper has done a lot worse things, more recently, than this.
If they're going to attract Canadian subscribers, they might want to get current on Canadian affairs.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)You can post whatever you like within the Terms of Service.
I am just an individual user, I am not affiliated with nor do I represent DU.
Wibly
(613 posts)Come on people, this is over ten years old news. We already know our PM is a plagiarist.
How about reporting on something more urgent that he's doing now, like snubbing his nose at our Vets, selling our country to China, snubbing the leader of our biggest province, or playing BFF with Mr. Netanyahu?
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)within the TOS of the site. That's the whole point of a user-generated discussion board.
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)They do that to divert the discussion away from the original subject.
I take it they don't want you questioning why two puppets from vastly different countries are reading some the same script.
onwardsand upwards
(276 posts)Thank you for posting this. Never mind the snarky trolls.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)One does wonder how something like that could occur. And, it's certainly not a CT to question how.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)....and economically cripple those that didn't.
Blair was on board so I can picture a memo going out.