Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 12:20 PM Apr 2012

Meet the Press: Rachel Maddow on women

&feature=player_embedded


Top Republican Strategist Denies Women Are Paid Less Than Men

This morning, during a heated discussion with Rachel Maddow on Meet The Press, GOP consultant Alex Castellanos denied that women make 77 cents for a man’s dollar in the workplace and noted, “there are lots of reasons for that.” Maddow expressed shock at the assertion, but concluded that it explained why Republicans and Mitt Romney are so hesitant to embrace the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, a law that helps women hold accountable employers who discriminate in the pay practices based on gender.

“Now we know, at least from both of your perspectives,” Maddow said, pointing to Castellanos and Romney surrogate Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), “women are not fairing worse than men in the economy that women aren’t getting paid less for equal work.” “It’s about policy and whether or not you want to fix some of the structural discrimination that women really do face that Republicans don’t believe is happening,” she added. Castellanos responded to Maddow’s policy argument by remarking on her passion, to which the MSNBC host took offense:

CASTELLANOS: It is about policy and I love how passionate you are. I wish you were as right about what you’re saying as you are passionate about it. I really do.

MADDOW: That’s really condescending. This is a stylistic issue. My passion on this issue is actually me making a factual argument on it.

more at link
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/04/29/473292/castellanos-fair-pay/

Rachel was Awesome this morning!
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Meet the Press: Rachel Maddow on women (Original Post) cal04 Apr 2012 OP
Castellanos was condescending and smug KaryninMiami Apr 2012 #1
OMG I did the same thing and I live alone. I was always afraid my apt. neighbors would think monmouth Apr 2012 #2
My cat gets amused I think KaryninMiami Apr 2012 #3
Well you repeat, repeat and keep repeat sooner or later someone is going to believe it. southernyankeebelle Apr 2012 #7
Scared the cat abolugi Apr 2012 #10
Conservative males do not believe in rights for women. Dawson Leery Apr 2012 #11
Condescending and smug PatSeg Apr 2012 #14
+1 freshwest Apr 2012 #19
Rachel rocks LASlibinSC Apr 2012 #4
Rachel rocks the house n/t tooeyeten Apr 2012 #5
Here is the main point as I see it. DWinNJ Apr 2012 #6
Of course DWinNJ Apr 2012 #8
Wait, is it "not true" or are there "a lot of reasons for" it? Recursion Apr 2012 #9
What part of MsPithy Apr 2012 #12
There are so called Progressive Liberal men here that don't believe it!! BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2012 #13
There are other aspects to this issue ... scribble Apr 2012 #15
The GOP is saying women make more than men???? aquart Apr 2012 #16
Rachel, thank you and I love you. Whisp Apr 2012 #17
I used to vote a split ticket, no longer. olegramps Apr 2012 #18
Castellanos has a history. sulphurdunn Apr 2012 #20
Rep's project their tactic of division on us. It is disgusting. You cannot believe what they say. The Wielding Truth Apr 2012 #21
On Sunday morning Iwillnevergiveup Apr 2012 #22
CNN, Who Castellanos works for, WeekendWarrior Apr 2012 #23
Yep, link below. redqueen May 2012 #25
I agree with Rachel: Castellanos is a condescending piece 'o shit. AtomicKitten May 2012 #24

KaryninMiami

(3,073 posts)
1. Castellanos was condescending and smug
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 12:31 PM
Apr 2012

He really acted like a smirky, smug adolescent asshole. Not to mention that it made me mad that he was given so much time to interrupt by Gregory - reminded me of the days of watching Bushco on tv- wanting to scream obscenities at the screen (and admittedly doing so which sounds a bit odd when you live alone).

monmouth

(21,078 posts)
2. OMG I did the same thing and I live alone. I was always afraid my apt. neighbors would think
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 12:41 PM
Apr 2012

I had truly gone 'round the bend...Castellanos is typical Faux material. He couldn't make it in the world of reality.

KaryninMiami

(3,073 posts)
3. My cat gets amused I think
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 12:59 PM
Apr 2012

When I laugh out loud or scream obscenities at the screen- or so it seems. As for my neighbors- hopefully I've not made so much noise that it leaks out into the hallways.

abolugi

(417 posts)
10. Scared the cat
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 02:25 PM
Apr 2012

and almost woke up my husband this morning yelling at the silly TV!!
I had to walk out of the room for a few minutes to compose myself!

PatSeg

(47,430 posts)
14. Condescending and smug
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 03:43 PM
Apr 2012

are the words that came to mind for me as well. He was smirking as he interrupted her. I'm surprised he didn't pat her on the head, "there, there dear, don't get so excited". What a jerk.

On the plus side, however, you just know Rachel won't let this slide. I'm quite sure she will rehash the exchange on her own show, complete with facts and statistics.

LASlibinSC

(269 posts)
4. Rachel rocks
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 01:08 PM
Apr 2012

Hopefully this jerk will think twice about using the *calm down little lady we know you're trying to help, but you are to hysterical to think of a counter argument* ploy.What an idiot! BTW I yell at the TV machine too, maybe a living alone phenomenon

DWinNJ

(261 posts)
6. Here is the main point as I see it.
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 01:59 PM
Apr 2012

Due to the (horrendous) Supreme Court ruling, unless you were psychic or you were in a workplace where everyone freely revealed their salary, you were not going to have an opportunity to seek legal recourse for unfair treatment.

A law was passed that said; you could have your day in court and if you could prove your point you could receive some degree of compensation.

If what Castellanos said was true, then the work would not be equal and you wouldn’t make your case.

What McMorris Rodgers voted against was a law to provide an opportunity to be treated fairly.

Rachel was on point and the rest was straw man BS.
(and her hair looks fine)

DWinNJ

(261 posts)
8. Of course
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 02:12 PM
Apr 2012

Of course Romney and his crowd (including his wife) wouldn’t understand that because they never had to depend on a paycheck.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
9. Wait, is it "not true" or are there "a lot of reasons for" it?
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 02:24 PM
Apr 2012

I mean, I often say "there are a lot of reasons for that", because the point is not that employers are saying "here's a woman, we can pay her less" but that a lot of factors are working together to make this happen (everything from women being expected to stay home with kids when they are young to the social fact that women apparently almost never ask for more money when they're made a job offer -- I was astounded to find that out because I was always taught to do that but apparently women aren't.)

MsPithy

(809 posts)
12. What part of
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 03:09 PM
Apr 2012

women make 77 cents for every dollar a man makes FOR THE SAME JOB AND THE SAME HOURS does he
(and David Gregory) not understand.

That blowhole just lied his ass off.

Or, Republicans think we are a stupid as they are about statistical significance.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47078102/ns/business-careers/t/women-make-cents-each-made-men/#.T52Oq-2AR0A

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
13. There are so called Progressive Liberal men here that don't believe it!!
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 03:21 PM
Apr 2012

same condescending attitude to women trying to debate them, and same refusal to listen to facts, too.




"I love your passion...." !!

scribble

(189 posts)
15. There are other aspects to this issue ...
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 05:19 PM
Apr 2012

Rachel was almost good enough, but she was alone on the panel and didn't get in the last word. It is crucial to get the last word on "Meet the Press."

Notice that the mf*ing moderator didn't "Moderate." I *hate* Meet the Press," thereby favoring Mitt Romney's surrogates. I hate that guy and I hate his show.


And the other aspect: Employers can discriminate against women, but they can also discriminate against men, too. In fact, they are working as hard as they can, to bring in low-wage immigrants from asia (especially India) to displace more experienced employees, who are more productive (and are paid more).

So, while this looks like a womens' issue today; it really is an immigration issue and a mens' issue as well. It's just that Rachel doesn't see it, and men aren't organized well enough to get her attention -- and neither men nor women can see how low-wage immigrants are displacing them even here, in domestic jobs.

This issue wouldn't exist if employers paid the same wage to the same individuals with the same skills and the same experiences. That's the REAL issue that we ALL ought to push for.


sc

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
17. Rachel, thank you and I love you.
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 05:48 PM
Apr 2012

Castellasshole was trying to speak down to her like she was a know -nothing Woman and Rachel shut his ass down good.

olegramps

(8,200 posts)
18. I used to vote a split ticket, no longer.
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 06:17 PM
Apr 2012

Today's Republicans are nothing more than disgusting slime bags. David Gregory is a total asshole jerk-off nobody. Any more you can tell when a Republican is lying, their lips are moving.

I have absolutely no Republicans who are friends. At best, they are only acquaintances who I tolerate as long as they keep the mouths shut. I find it impossible to actually be a friend to someone who I have absolutely no respect for their beliefs. In the past I have been close to several, but they have became so damn extreme and spewed nothing more than outright fabrication that I didn't care to be associate with them.

Some of these very same people have now fallen on hard times, however, I have little sympathy for some of these people since they supported their own destruction. How smug and self assured they were until they were on the chopping block and even some ridiculously attempt to blame the very people who support the middle class for the economic disaster. I am convinced that the whole damn system will have to collapse before the people come to the senses.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
20. Castellanos has a history.
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 08:26 PM
Apr 2012

Near the end of the 1990 U.S. Senate race in North Carolina, Castellanos produced an advertisement for incumbent Republican Senator Jesse Helms, who was then trailing Democratic challenger and Charlotte mayor Harvey Gantt, an African-American. The ad shows the hands of a white man crumpling a job application rejection notice as a narrator intones, "You needed that job. But they had to give it to a minority."The ad then references Gantt's supposed support for racial quotas and Helms's opposition.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Castellanos

Castellanos is a reptilian hominid. The GOP establishment is owned by them. They're serpents who walk upright, coldblooded and big brained. The medical profession refers to them as psychopaths. I think they're just subhuman assholes in suits with big bank accounts.

Iwillnevergiveup

(9,298 posts)
22. On Sunday morning
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 02:34 AM
Apr 2012

Sleep in. Go for a walk. With the dog, if you have one. Fix a great breakfast. Take a shower. Do a crossword. Read something. Meet a friend. Call a friend. Water the plants. Have a roll in the hay. Do some laundry. Just sit with your coffee.

But do NOT start off the day with the aggravation of MTP and DG. It works.

WeekendWarrior

(1,437 posts)
23. CNN, Who Castellanos works for,
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 06:06 PM
Apr 2012

had a story on this today pretty much saying that Rachel's stats were right and that Castellanos had "no comment."

I figured they'd defend him, but they didn't...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Meet the Press: Rachel Ma...