Boston Globe Reporter Identifies Gun Waving Cop (UPDATE)

[Jesus Malverde]

Boston police have launched an internal affairs investigation into an incident involving a 61-year-old man who videotaped a police sergeant waving what appeared to be a seized firearm in his face as he filmed officers stopping a teenager on a Roxbury street this month.

The gun was a realistic-looking toy, according to police, but civil rights advocates and the man who recorded the video say that does not matter. The video shows the sergeant questioning the man about why he was videotaping, saying he did not consent to be taped, then walking over and holding the gun up close to the camera, saying, “That’s why we’re here.” The sergeant does not point the gun at the man.

“His intention was to put that in my face and produce fear. That was his intention,” said the man, who asked to be identified by the name Brother Lawrence, because he said he feared retaliation for speaking out. “I thought my life was in jeopardy there.”

Boston police spokesman Lieutenant Michael McCarthy said the sergeant depicted in the video, Henry Staines, has been counseled that citizens have the constitutional right to videotape police officers doing their jobs. An internal affairs investigation has begun, McCarthy said, and Staines will meet with Lawrence, Boston NAACP President Michael Curry, and Superintendent-in-Chief William Gross on Friday. A reminder has also gone out to all officers that citizens can legally videotape them, McCarthy said.

“The officer knew… that the firearm was a toy firearm,” said McCarthy, who said realistic-looking fake guns are a growing and dangerous problem that put youths and police in danger. “It appeared as though his frustration at that point was that this young child who was out there carrying this firearm could have been shot for carrying a toy. Not to frighten. Not to threaten the person taking the video. But to educate them on the fact that these things were out there.”

http://www.copblock.org/123454/

[merrily]

1. Deprivation of First Amendment rights under color of law.

http://www.constitution.org/brief/forsythe_42-1983.htm

[Spitfire of ATJ]

2. If that many cops were available to respond to a toy gun,...

....then there was NOTHING going on elsewhere.

Makes ya think these days that Mayberry would have 50 guys on the force.

[cynzke]

3. There Was Nothing Going On!

The Cops should have ignored the videographer. If anything, this showed the cops NOT overly aggressive in terms of the treatment of the youth. But then they had to confront the filmer.

[Jesus Malverde]

4. And threaten him with a car ride

61 years old the camera man.

[ctsnowman]

5. I am sure

officer friendly is one of the a-holes that take the "if you have nothing to hide" approach to illegal searches. Well that door swings both ways.