Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumPic Of The Moment: Jeb Bush Says Jesus Would Be The Perfect Republican Candidate
Large GOP field has party leaders anxious about their chances in '16
Follow @demunderground
bananas
(27,509 posts)questionseverything
(9,654 posts)Jesus said," whatever you do for the least of them,you do for me"
since only the dems care about feeding poor children, i am faith bound to be a democrat
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)He could easily be referring to Satan or Pontius Pilate.
questionseverything
(9,654 posts)i think He was referring to the poor,the sick, the children....and since it is my faith i can see it anyway i want
do you have a problem with democrats being Christian and wanting to feed the poor or heal the sick or take care of the elderly?
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Of course I don't. I just don't believe the Bush family are Christians. I think that if they worship anything it's demons.
questionseverything
(9,654 posts)i misunderstood your comment
i don't want to try and judge the bush family's faith either way but
one thing that is a problem in this country seems to be too much concentration on the old testament and not enough on the new testament among "conservative" Christians
bananas
(27,509 posts)People are pointing out that Jeb could be referring to Pontius Pilate, Herod, etc.
Took me a few minutes to figure that out.
So I think in post #61 "He" refers to Jeb, and "Him" refers to Jesus
replacing those ambiguous pronouns would make post #61 say
Jeb could easily be referring to Satan or Pontius Pilate.
questionseverything
(9,654 posts)honestly i didnt read anything but the graphic
just jumped at the chance to say it is the democratic party that more closely follows Jesus mandate of "caring for the least of them"
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)and would make more sense that he'd be referring to a rightwing
establishmentarian, authoritarian type of guy, prone to taxing
the poor, shunning the weak, the vulnerable, acquiring personal
wealth; prone as well to condemning anti-establishment bleeding
heart types, killing them whenever he can justify it legally.
AllTooEasy
(1,260 posts)..or Tiberius. Let's not jump to conclusions.
central scrutinizer
(11,648 posts)Ted Cruz seems about as crazy as Caligula (maybe he will nominate his horse as VP) and most of the others seem content to fiddle while the Republic burns
rpannier
(24,329 posts)Tiberius was still tossing people off the cliffs at his estate away from Rome
Caligula was born in 12 AD. Was an excellent army officer who was well respected and liked by Romans until about a year into his reign (he likely suffered lead poisoning from drinking hot liquids from the cups that he drank from which were made from lead)
Though he had a brother Nero, it was not the Nero we know best from history. His brother died in 31 AD.
That Nero was born in 37 AD and ruled from 54-68
happyslug
(14,779 posts)The first reason for this is water adsorbs lead mostly when the water is standing still, not flowing and how Rome did its aqueducts and pipes the water ALWAYS was flowing (the various fountains in Rome in Ancient times and restarted during the Renaissance is the result of such constant flow of water.
The second reason is the water in the aqueducts tended to have high mineral content, which tended to line the pipe with they residue, isolating the lead from the water in the process. This lining was about a mm per year about an 4 inches in a century.
On the other hand lead was used in producing "wine" (Rome had a bad problem of Counterfeit wine, in fact one ancient writer said the cheaper the wine, the better it is for it is more pure and NOT counterfeited with derivatives to make it taste better, as was the case with more expensive wines). This "improvements" on the wine included the use of lead pots, which could in theory lead to a massive increase in lead consumption.
The problems are the numbers needed to achieve such insanity, are way higher then the numbers needed to produce other problems:
Such levels have significant physiological consequences. As reported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, there is brain and kidney damage in adults with blood lead levels of 100 µg/dL; gastrointestinal symptoms such as colic, with levels of approximately 60 µg/dL; anemia with levels of 50 to 80 µg/dL; neurological symptoms with levels of 40 to 60 µg/dL; depressed sperm count with levels of 40 to 50 µg/dL; and increased risk of preterm delivery, low birth weight, and impaired mental development with maternal blood lead levels of 10 to 15 µg/dL. The physiological insult to children would have been even greater. In children five years or younger, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends intervention when the level of lead in the blood is above even 5 µg/dL.
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/wine/leadpoisoning.html
Thus, if the source of lead was from the wine itself, you are having 21 times what the US Department of Agriculture reports when you will start seeing solid signs of Lead poisoning. People would notice and someone would have stopped the poisoning IF THE LEAD WAS THAT HIGH.
Caligula had problems, he ruled for less then four years. He was born in 12 AD, but his Father was poisoned in 19 Ad, (it is believed on orders from Tiberius). Thus at the age of 7 Caligula was being involved in the open fight between his mother and Tiberius that was a continuation of the fight between his father and Tiberius.
Caligula's father, Germanicus, had defeated the Germans after the Germans had destroyed three Roman Legions when Augustus tried to conquer Germany. Tiberius always viewed Germanacus as a threat for he was popular with the troops given his victories over the Germans. Germanicus's widow, Antonia, was as popular, as where his children. Antonia was the daughter of Octavia minor, the sister of Augustus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanicus
Now, you must remember Mark Anthony's first wife. She is forgotten in all the movies about him, for she was in charge of Italy after Julius Caesar's death and made sure Mark Antony's claims were protected even if that meant use of troops while Mark Anthony was away in the East. In her efforts to protect Mark Anthony's interest she ended up fighting and dying, but it was her efforts that made Mark Anthony the second man in Rome behind Augustus. This history was not forgotten, for at her death Mark Anthony married the sister of Augustus and together their produced Germanicus's father.
More on Mark Anthony's first wife, Fulvia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulvia
On Mark Anthony's Second wife and Augustus's sister (She ended up taking care of all of Mark Anthony's children, not only her own but Fluvia's and Cleopatra's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octavia_the_Younger
Octavia was much favored by her brother, she was six years older them him and in their younger years had watched over him (almost a mother-child relationship then a sister-brother relationship, thus Anthony's divorce of her was unforgivable by Augustus).
Octavia and Mark Anthony did have children, one of who, Antonia the elder (also known as Antonia Minor, Minor being the latin version of "Younger", became the Mother of Germanicus. Thus Germanicus was the grandson of Mark Anthony and the grand nephew of Augustus. Thus Germanicus was the grandson of Augustus's favorite sister. This gave him an edge over Tiberius in any fight over the throne for Augustus had no sons except by adoption (and these adoptive children stayed with their natural parents, the adoption was stickily political)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonia_Minor
Thus Germanicus was a heir not only to Augustus (via Germanicus's mother and grandmother) but of Mark Anthony who was his Grandfather via Antonia. Thus Germanicus was popular not only with the troops but the people of Rome. Under Tiberius that combination was a death sentence.
Thus Germnaicus was poisoned.
Now Tiberius has one son, Drusus, but under the Plot Praetorian Guard Sejanus he was killed by his own wife (or died of heavy drinking, the record is unclear). Drusus had one son, but even Tiberius believe that son was really the son of Sejanus NOT Drusus. That grandson of Tiberius, Gemelus, was as first was adopted and thus the heir of Caligula when Caligula became emperor, but later that same year Caligula had Gemelus killed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drusus_Julius_Caesar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiberius_Gemellus
Caligula had two older brothers, both were killed under Tiberius for alleged plots against Tiberius. These appear to be the fears of a mad man, but Tiberius by then was NOT living in Rome but on Capri so lead was NOT a factor.
Thus by the time we get to Tiberius's death, he had no sons, and his only living relatives where quite young, Caligula (age 25 when he became Emperor) and Gemelus (age 19 at the time he is executed by Caligula).
Caligula had seen his father killed, his two older brother killed. his own mother was arrested, exiled, flogged (in one flogging she lost an eye) seeing her situation as bad, she starved herself to death (Hunger strike till she was permitted to go back to Rome).
More on Caligula's Mother Agrippa the elder:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrippina_the_Elder#Time_in_Rome.2C_downfall_and_posthumous_honors
Given the above treatment of his Father (dead when Caligula was 7), Mother (dead when he was 21), and brothers (both Dead before Caligula was 20, recorded as have been starved to death) and his uncles and cousins (all dead, most by unnatural causes). Caligula had to be careful, then he gained all power as Emperor. He was careful at first, but when he found out that the Army and the People of Rome wanted him for he was the son of Germanicus it went to his head.
One thing to note, at that time period it was required of all troops and Roman Citizens to know how to swim, yet Caligula could not. This supports the theory he had Epileptic fits for people with Epilepsy are discouraged from swimming in case they had a fit while swimming.
My position on Caligula is he shows all of the aspects of a Spoiled Brat AND someone who is recovering from post traumatic shock (The death of his brothers and Mother more then the death of his father, for the former were when he was in his late teens or early 20s, the death of his father was at age 7, an age young enough for him to recover from such a loss quickly). His demand to be treated as a living god even in Rome shows a NEED to be in demand, a reflection of his years in isolation when his mother fought for his and his brother's rights after the death of her husband.
Now, most of the talk of his insanity appears to be post assassination justification. i.e. he had to die for he was insane. On the other hand his plan to move to Alexandria and abandoned Rome, put both the Senate and Praetorian guards on edge. i.e. if he left, he was the commander of every Legion, the Legions were his personal army not the Army of Rome. The bureaucracy set up by Augustus was to pay for that Army, This Bureaucracy was independent of the state for it was considered part of the household of the Emperor, and thus by the time of Caligula was more powerful then the Senate.
Thus the movement of Emperor to Alexandria meant the Emperor, the Roman Army and the whole government to support that army would go with it.
The only organization that could have STOPPED this move would have been the Plebeian Council, but technically it had turned over all its power to the Emperor under Augustus, but still meet till the last years of Tiberius's Rule. The Council could have been the means to get the people of Rome to object to the move in mass, but it no longer meet (but the memory of it still survived).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plebeian_Council#From_471_to_27_BC
Furthermore the Senate of Caligula was no longer the exclusive domain of the old aristocratic families of Rome. Most could not trace themselves further back then to Julius Caesar. The old families were still around and connected to the Senate, but no where near the power they had just 100 years before. In the last years of Tiberius's rule, these two groups had effectively merged and had ruled Rome quite well during the time Tiberius was in self imposed Exile. Caligula bringing the Emperor ship back to Rome changed that and a series of conflicts arouse. When the conflicts became so bad that Caligula decided to move to Alexandria, it was decided he had to go. The Senate was NOT looking to find a new Emperor but to continue what they had done in the last years of Tiberius's rule. To do that Caligula had to go and he went.
The problem was the People of Rome still like Germanicus's name and when Caligula's uncle (Germanicus's brother) was found they made him Emperor. There was some protests, but the new Emperor could work with the Senate and together they ruled Rome till he died and Nero became Emperor.
Thus the whole attack on Caligula may just be justification for his assassination and the attempted coup against him. Claudius did not care to defend his dead nephew for it did not affect his rule, so the attacks on Caligula were permitted and became worse over time. This does not mean Caligula was a Good Emperor, but they is no real evidence he was insane or a truly bad emperor, but one that could NOT work with the Senate as his Uncle was able to do.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)The hot liquid caused the lead in the cup to mix with the liquid they drank
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)I don't have time ATM to read your entire post, but that phrase is so wrong I had to reply.
Water does not adsorb lead, it absorbs lead.
Water absorbs lead as long as it is in contact with it.
That may lead into the mistaken notion that moving water doesn't absorb lead, the water standing in lead pipes overnight have been in contact with lead longer. Running the tap for a while only reduces lead content if there is a relatively short run of lead pipe close to the tap. If your water source had a mile of lead pipe there's going to be lead in the water regardless of the rate the water is flowing.
PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)If he were a presidential candidate:
1. The corporate owned media wouldn't cover him
2. He would not be invited to participate in debates
3. No super-PACS would give him money
The sad truth is that the further America moves TOWARD neoliberal capitalism, the further AWAY it moves from the tenets of Christ.
Bossy Monkey
(15,863 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Republicans LOVE brown-skinned religious guys from the Middle-East.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)xocet
(3,871 posts)n/t
bananas
(27,509 posts)Especially now that science is discovering the many health benefits of wine.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I shit you not.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)(Batman)
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)But, not quite fermented or fermented, it was wine.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)an idiot. "He's the smart one" they are saying....sure..........
Auggie
(31,169 posts)Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)I've always held that as the right wing rail against shellfish and gay marriage as preached in small passages in the Old Testament, they somehow dismiss the most important message of all as preached in the New Testament, the Sermon on the Mount (Beatitudes). You don't have to be a believer to appreciate this, and you won't hear about it on Fox News, Free Republic or talk radio:
"Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Blessed are they who mourn,
for they shall be comforted.
Blessed are the meek,
for they shall inherit the earth.
Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they shall be satisfied.
Blessed are the merciful,
for they shall obtain mercy.
Blessed are the pure of heart,
for they shall see God.
Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they shall be called children of God.
Blessed are they who are persecuted for the sake of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven."
Gospel of St. Matthew 5:3-10
47of74
(18,470 posts)camelfan
(130 posts)Wait a minute...he wasn't white?
Wash. state Desk Jet
(3,426 posts)I can almost hear G.W. Bush telling the nation technology will lead the way, echoes form the past. He was presenting the greatest fix on crutch the republican party ever put out there. The automakers were going under the economy was heading straight down the toilet.
Bush spoke about gloom,doom and despair.
And just the other day Hop Along Jeb took a bite out of the apple.
Suddenly it all becomes clear as a bell.
Snake eyes. Rolling the dice. It all comes down to the wrist watch.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)SMU-Southern Methodist University did not want his library and fought against it for several years. He made a dumb C-ass speech there the other day giving graduates his advice on how to be successful. How stomach turning. How did the Bush's come to power anyway? The evil empire of Conservatism instead of the fellowship and direction of Jesus.
In reality, Republicans/Bush's oppose Jesus just like the OP says.
wolfie001
(2,231 posts)....out-pander each other. The results are hilarious! So much stupid shared between those two clowns.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)I seem to recall that he converted to his wife's religion. I thought Catholics were considered to be non-Christians by the more extreme evangelicals. Maybe he should avoid the issue of religion because of the religious bigots in his own party.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Zambero
(8,964 posts)And how Mormons feel about Jehovah's Witnesses
And how Jehovah's Witnesses feel about Seventh Day Adventists
etc, etc, etc.
It sure is reassuring to know that Christians aren't such a divisive, fragmented, and judgmental bunch, like, say, those Muslim types...
Wolf Frankula
(3,600 posts)Where's his birth certificate? The Loooooong form. And who was his real daddy?
Wolf
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)much of his party's base won't care enough that he and others are misinterpreting the Bible for a backwards agenda.
Saviolo
(3,282 posts)...right out of the lips of Sarah Palin. It's the type of grandstanding, silly, tone-deaf, faux-down-home baloney that I'd expect to spew from her.
Jeb's not helping himself much, here.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Since most fundamentalist Christians tend to follow the teachings of Paul, the guy that came after Jesus. Paul tended to contradict what Jesus said and was a bit of a 'convert them or kill them' mentality.
alterfurz
(2,474 posts)...who hung around with lepers hookers and crooks; wasn't American and never spoke English; was anti-wealth anti-death penalty anti-public prayer (Matthew 6:5); but was never anti-gay, never mentioned abortion or birth control, never called the poor lazy, never justified torture, never fought for tax cuts for the wealthiest Nazarenes, never asked a leper for a copay; and was a long-haired brown-skinned homeless community-organizing anti-slut-shaming Middle Eastern Jew." -- John Fugelsang
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)Is a pack of clones diverse?
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)diverse it gets.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)malthaussen
(17,195 posts)... but I'd give a nickel if somebody would pin him to the wall and demand to know on what basis he makes that statement.
-- Mal
LuvNewcastle
(16,846 posts)who is Jewish, appropriately enough.
DFW
(54,378 posts)Where any real historical Jesus would have been a dark-skinned, Aramaic-speaking Palestinian?
DhhD
(4,695 posts)DFW
(54,378 posts)Pretty much the same way Latin came from Portuguese
Volaris
(10,271 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)We can't put ideas of equality, compassion, peace and love in the minds of the common man, now can we?
the burning tears of sarcasm
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)was an advocate for War? - Was He a neocon? I'm still looking for this passage?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)and Jesus came back and started saying those sort of things now, he'd be accused of not being a real Christian by folks on the right.
Volaris
(10,271 posts)and Ted Cruz would swing the Hammer.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)The One King of the Seven Hills.
Initech
(100,075 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)them, even has his own sheet. And it's a him, though how they figured that I never heard.
douggg
(239 posts)casting out the moneylenders?
Go for it, Jeb!
3catwoman3
(23,985 posts)...vote for Jesus than any of the other jackasses who have thrown their egos into the ring.
nruthie
(466 posts)Everyone else in the country seems to be running for President, so why not.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Not unless Jesus bears the right phallus.
[img][/img]
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)with them, even on guns as well.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Just sayin'.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Now "maybe" is about as far as I would go, but did Jeb Bush just tell his base that he questions the existence of Jesus Christ? Probably, Jeb?
tclambert
(11,086 posts)Teabaggers might claim to have Christian values, but try to run a candidate named Jesus, and they'll scream, "No Hispanics! Give us Barabbas Bush!"
Capitalism--The basis of which is greed. Hahaha. Yeah, I doubt he would favor either major party. Oops, gotta go. I just noticed a Reaper UAV headed my way.
captainarizona
(363 posts)who would jesus bomb or drone? who would jesus execute? who would jesus cut off welfare benefits food stamps unemployment insurance? who would jesus take money from to buy him?
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)and I agree with him 100%
tanyev
(42,558 posts)Why do Republicans hate the Constitution?
MADem
(135,425 posts)And he fed the multitudes with his water into wine and loaves/fishes tricks!
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Last edited Wed May 20, 2015, 11:44 PM - Edit history (1)
I'm no expert but I am so sick and tired of these phony Christian hypocrites, that just pull random stuff from the Bible and then spin it for their own personal evil purposes.
Really, when was the last time we heard a Puke or Bagger "preaching" the positive?!?
charlespercydemocrat
(46 posts)That's just what bush was doing.
calimary
(81,265 posts)seems to me to be THE statement in favor of Separation of Church and State.
I've never seen a Gospel passage that quoted Him as saying "render unto both Caesar and God that which both of them share (or have equal claim to)."
It
Just
ISN'T
There.
Seems to me from all my years in Catholic school as a kid - that a VERY clear distinction was made between secular government entities and the religious side. They AREN'T one-and-the-same. They AREN'T tied to each other inextricably. They AREN'T two sides to the same coin. They're two separate, distinct, dissimilar entities. At least that's been my takeaway from studying that passage.
Matthew 22:15-22King James Version (KJV)
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+22%3A15-22&version=KJV
0rganism
(23,954 posts)not to mention the "Jewish" thing
and everything else mentioned in the OP
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)won't vote for their hypocritical asses. So fasten your seat belts because we're going to hear much more how Christians are being ''discriminated against''. They're so full of crap it makes me sick to my stomach. Jebs brother and Cheney were of the Devil. If I believed in the Devil that is. But pure evil.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Owl
(3,642 posts)polynomial
(750 posts)The Bush family record is so corrupt, criminal, and screwed up, Jeb has no alternative but to go back in time two thousand years in prerecorded history to avoid charges of political swindling and profiteering.
It is a WTF moment when a presidential candidate also diminished the value of the very document they profess to defend, the Constitution, says there is no religious test of the candidate.
Jeb now preaches like a religious heretic, who disavows a revealed truth ...more and obvious the Iraq war was a lie and he was an integral part of it, helping Arabs, and their money flee the country.
Jeb is cursed, being groomed for decades as smart in the political arena now to finds himself bless to be condemned every time he quotes the bible, even asking blessings for America is only a parable to profiteer and build his family fortune.
IrishEyes
(3,275 posts)I also think he would be for healing the sick, feeding the hungry, helping the poor, peace, taxing the rich, non violence, and freedom. He wouldn't be a republican. Are we sure Jeb wasn't talking about another historical figure that would be more in line with the republican ideology like Nero?
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Jeb's further CONfirmation that STRANGE things live in the bushes! As Bushes go, Jeb demonstrates a burning desire to pontificate his whiz-dumb!
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)erpowers
(9,350 posts)The problems is that no one in the news media challenges Republicans when they say things like this. At least one reporter or news anchor should ask a Republican what would make Jesus Christ a Republican. Please point to one of his statements that would give support to the idea that he would be a Republican.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)I mean, who takes these bumper sticker blurbs seriously? Who thinks he means what he just said? What did he just say even MEAN???
I want adults with quick smart brains running the country, please.
IronLionZion
(45,442 posts)So a long-haired Jewish peacenick community organizer with no wife or kids that we know of....good luck!
Remember what he said about abortion and guns!
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)and frankly, if I didn't laugh about it, I would cry.
She's wary of Hillary because of 4 people dead in Benghazi, loves Ronald Reagan, and suddenly becomes confused and convinced that I am attacking her when I point out dead Marines in Beirut under her hero's watch, gets mad because I mention whose watch 9/11 happened on, and is puzzled when I ask her which party the deficit increases under.
I pretty much pointed out that the only person she will ever vote for is a big strapping cowboy like my father pretends to be (He has a few guns, and the few times he's used them for hunting ducks he was bad at it, and is afraid of horses - he looked like he was going to have a heart attack when he saw me riding one balls out at a gallop) that pretends to give a crap about the Republicans that vote for them.
The poisonous look I received could have killed everyone in the county and two counties over.
I asked her if she knew anything about the dead marines in Nepal. "Oh, I heard about that."
My response "Well, if your only response to 8 Marines dying trying to save people is "what a tragedy" but 4 dead in a known CIA outpost conducting weapons trades is "outrage", you might need to re-evaluate your principles."
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)They're ALL so good!
They're all SO good!
They're all so GOOD!
Republicans have an array of candidates demonstrating strength. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker got off to a fast start in January and sits at or near the top in many polls, while Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.) rose with a splashy April campaign launch that highlighted his charisma and youthful vigor. Others have impressed, too, including Carly Fiorina, a former technology executive and the lone woman in the field, who is considered a long shot but wowed RNC members in Scottsdale with her substantive stump speech and cutting attacks on Clinton.
Republican activists love that they have so many candidates to consider. At Bushs event, Darlene Block, 73, the party co-chairman in Jackson County, ticked through her short list: Jebs on it. So is Dr. [Ben] Carson. And I like I keep forgetting his name, but hes the senator from Florida. Marco? Marco Rubio! Im terrible on names. Ive met Ted Cruz, Ive found that [former Texas governor Rick] Perry was so much more sensible than I thought he would be. . . . And Rev. [Mike] Huckabee. . . . They all are so good.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)This is the funniest thing I have ever seen you say in these Pics of the Moment, Earl.
This tops them all.
Because it is so true.
And also, sad at the same time.
Because Republicans quote Jesus all of the time, and yet none of them act as if they would follow him if Jesus were alive today.
They are hypocrites.
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)I am sure that the Republicans want to nominate a Jewish, Middle Eastern, rebellious type who thinks that people will be judged on the basis of their treatment of the 'least of these', that it is as hard for a rich man to enter Heaven as for a camel to get through a needle's eye, and that one cannot worship both God and Mammon.
In any case, what the Republicans obviously really want is to nominate the ghost of Ronald Reagan.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Holy shit, never seen anything this so thoroughly wrecking of a Republican position ever.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)No less.
It was your Top Ten Conservative Idiots column that drew me to DU in the first place. While I still miss the wonderful work that you did there, these near-daily spot-on graphics are certainly a great consolation prize.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)Self-deluded, grandiose, overcome by a Messianic Complex and blind to the hypocrisy --
Makes my head explode whenever they spout this bullshit.
If all you have is a cursory knowledge of the New Testament, it is easy to see that all of
the teachings and actions of Jesus are politically Liberal.
The policies and the mind-set of Conservatism are completely similar with those of
The Pharisees -- whom Jesus despised -- and are anathema to Christianity.
The Beatitudes ("Blessed are those who ... " would never apply to a conservative
person of today's NeoCon stripe.
However, every quote from Jesus that was framed as a warning and which began with
the phrase, "Woe to you ..." certainly does apply to them.
Those Pharisees believed that they were the chosen ones who acted on behalf of God.
But they killed Jesus for political expedience, and to protect their power and authority,
because he told them to their faces that they were totally full of shit.
Woe to you too, Jeb!
Cha
(297,221 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)might prove to be incorrect.
mercuryblues
(14,531 posts)healing the sick thing was just Jesus paying a prank.
unblock
(52,227 posts)try winning the republican nomination now, you heathen!