Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1289 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What 80 Tons of Methane Can Do to LA? (Original Post)
thomhartmann
Jan 2016
OP
"WHAT WENT WRONG AT PORTER RANCH?" (besides Corporate Democrats running things).
Peace Patriot
Jan 2016
#2
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)1. TYPO: 80K or 80,000 tons (and increasing)
http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2016/01/06/ca-gas-well-leaks-85k-tons-of-methane.html
OUT OF CONTROL
2 days ago
California Gas Well Leaks 85K Tons of Methane
An uncontrolled gas leak at the Aliso Canyon well has released about 85,000 tons of methane, making it the biggest contributor to climate change in California. The rupture in the natural gas well, which sits more than 8,700 feet underground, was first detected in October at the Southern California Gas Co. facility north of Los Angeles in Porter Ranch, where hundreds of residents have been evacuated. Scientists say methane pollutes at more than 80 times the rate of carbon dioxide over a 20-year period...
OUT OF CONTROL
2 days ago
California Gas Well Leaks 85K Tons of Methane
An uncontrolled gas leak at the Aliso Canyon well has released about 85,000 tons of methane, making it the biggest contributor to climate change in California. The rupture in the natural gas well, which sits more than 8,700 feet underground, was first detected in October at the Southern California Gas Co. facility north of Los Angeles in Porter Ranch, where hundreds of residents have been evacuated. Scientists say methane pollutes at more than 80 times the rate of carbon dioxide over a 20-year period...
Highly informative interview. Thank you for posting.
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)2. "WHAT WENT WRONG AT PORTER RANCH?" (besides Corporate Democrats running things).
Good, full background article on the leak, the affected people and SoCalGas:
WHAT WENT WRONG AT PORTER RANCH?
http://www.laweekly.com/news/what-went-wrong-at-porter-ranch-6405804
L.A. Weekly sort of wimps out, however, with this linked article:
GOV. BROWN CRACKS DOWN ON GAS COMPANY FOLLOWING PORTER RANCH DISASTER
http://www.laweekly.com/news/gov-brown-cracks-down-on-gas-company-following-porter-ranch-disaster-6452684
But the article itself is not so sure that this is a "crackdown."
Brown's action will impose new emergency regulations on gas storage facilities throughout the state. Operators will be required to use imaging technology to check for leaks at well sites on a daily basis. They will also have to verify the mechanical integrity of wells and regularly test safety valves. Some of the new rules appear to mandate practices that are already standard in the industry, and it will require further detail to understand how strict the new requirements are. --from the above L.A. Weekly article on Brown
Both articles were written by Gene Mauddaus but I wonder who wrote the headlines.
What's happening here, politically, is that the consequences of Corporate Rule, and in particular the complicity of Corporate Democrats with Corporate Rule--after half a century of fascist Reaganism--have become a big, ugly, stinking, toxic cloud for all to see.
Thank you, Thom Hartmann, once again, for making this very, very clear.