Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Would Any True Progressive Still Support President Obama? (Original Post) GoLeft TV Mar 2016 OP
His endorsement of Wasserman-Schultz to me was a pathetic FU to progressiveism Merryland Mar 2016 #1
I'm pretty sure "True Progressives"don't ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #2
+ 1 JoePhilly Mar 2016 #4
"progressivism" has been divorced from economic justice tk2kewl Mar 2016 #5
Funny ... progressivism (as reflected on DU) is ONLY about economic justice ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #6
how do you explain endorsing someone who's on the side of payday lenders? tk2kewl Mar 2016 #7
That does not require explanation (from me), since that is an economic issue. 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #13
How about social justice? dogman Mar 2016 #8
Lip service, in my view ... Far behind the battle against the "oligarchs, et al." 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #14
What a dim view. dogman Mar 2016 #18
I call it like I see it (as represented on DU, these days). 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #19
You are certainly correct about DU defining progressivism only in economic terms. LonePirate Mar 2016 #12
I'll bet ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #16
Probably because it's not true. dogman Mar 2016 #20
Except it is true. He is to the right of Clinton on guns who is to the right of O'Malley. LonePirate Mar 2016 #26
That is what I wrote. dogman Mar 2016 #29
So it's OK for a politician not to be progressive if their constituents don't support it? LonePirate Mar 2016 #30
1 issue that doesn't meet your standard. dogman Mar 2016 #36
Ah, so there's a required number of issues that determines if someone is a progressive? LonePirate Mar 2016 #37
No, but math tells me what more and less is. dogman Mar 2016 #38
I was awfully disappointed when he endorsed DWS. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #3
"True" progressives=The Purity Party redstateblues Mar 2016 #9
Who is or was a true progressive? katmondoo Mar 2016 #10
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #17
He's right. Fuddnik Mar 2016 #11
Oooooo. Obama bashing season again! BumRushDaShow Mar 2016 #15
I've stuck up for Obama over and over The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #21
His entire time in office BumRushDaShow Mar 2016 #27
I still support President Obama because he created the Healthcare system that may save my life liberalnarb Mar 2016 #22
"Pure corporatist?" What total BS. Nitram Mar 2016 #23
Because DoubleThink? [n/t] Maedhros Mar 2016 #24
So, anyone know where The Polack MSgt Mar 2016 #25
Jury results. zeemike Mar 2016 #28
I can't believe someone alerted this. 21st Century Poet Mar 2016 #32
True! mountain grammy Mar 2016 #34
Obama's job is to be President not to be a True Progressive 21st Century Poet Mar 2016 #31
Obama's DNC head lost 11 Governors, 13 Senators, 69 Reps, 913 state seats, and left the party MisterP Apr 2016 #39
What has Obama done for us Monty Python style. iandhr Mar 2016 #33
Give em' hell Pap! TIME TO PANIC Mar 2016 #35

Merryland

(1,134 posts)
1. His endorsement of Wasserman-Schultz to me was a pathetic FU to progressiveism
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 11:58 AM
Mar 2016

He didn't need to do that, but he did.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
2. I'm pretty sure "True Progressives"don't ...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 11:59 AM
Mar 2016

but, would offer, a Progressive that lives in, and understands, the messy, messy real world, might.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
6. Funny ... progressivism (as reflected on DU) is ONLY about economic justice ...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:15 PM
Mar 2016

and from my view, it isn't even about economic justice, so much as taking from the wealthy to put more money in the pockets of the almost wealthy, with a few sprinkles for the nowhere near wealthy.

LonePirate

(13,420 posts)
12. You are certainly correct about DU defining progressivism only in economic terms.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:27 PM
Mar 2016

I said yesterday that Bernie was not a true progressive because of his comparatively weak stance on gun control. My comment was not warmly received.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
16. I'll bet ...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:43 PM
Mar 2016

your first mistake was attempting to suggest that Sanders is a less than perfect progressive.

LonePirate

(13,420 posts)
26. Except it is true. He is to the right of Clinton on guns who is to the right of O'Malley.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:16 PM
Mar 2016

That D- grade means he supports something the NRA supports otherwise he would have received an F like Clinton did. He certainly doesn't champion the progressive European or Australian views on gun control. There is no way Sanders is a progressive on gun issues and I say that as someone who voted for him. He is a centrist on gun issues.

dogman

(6,073 posts)
29. That is what I wrote.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:24 PM
Mar 2016

My point being that D- to F is comparatively close. If he were a centrist he would have a C rating. D- is closer to F than C. They are one issue apart, that is the liability of manufacturers for weapon use beyond their control. The point being that if the manufacturers were liable for the use of weapons beyond their control, they would have to close. While that might be attractive to some, it does not represent the wishes of his constituency in Vermont.

LonePirate

(13,420 posts)
30. So it's OK for a politician not to be progressive if their constituents don't support it?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:32 PM
Mar 2016

I was unaware that cafeteria progressivism even existed.

dogman

(6,073 posts)
36. 1 issue that doesn't meet your standard.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 05:20 PM
Mar 2016

Do you agree with the death penalty? do you agree with the war on drugs? do you agree with limited choice? do you agree with corporate welfare? Combine those as opposed to limited liability for gun manufacturers. It looks like they have a lot more choices in her cafeteria.

LonePirate

(13,420 posts)
37. Ah, so there's a required number of issues that determines if someone is a progressive?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 05:24 PM
Mar 2016

Do you have that number or know who decides what the number is?

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,693 posts)
3. I was awfully disappointed when he endorsed DWS.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:01 PM
Mar 2016

That came across as a huge kick in the pants aimed at progressives. The thing is, he really didn't have to endorse her at all since it's a primary election. But he did. Why? I'm really steamed.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
17. LOL ...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:49 PM
Mar 2016
Who is or was a true progressive?


Anyone that agrees with me with respect to policy approach and priorities.

But since this is primary season ... anyone the supports Bernie and/or demonizes HRC, DWS, and the DNC.

{I'll get around to further culling of those that are insufficiently in agreement with me ... after the primaries.}

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
11. He's right.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:25 PM
Mar 2016

Obama doesn't and never has given a shit about us.

Google his speech at Robert Rubins Hamilton Project when he was a Senator. "Make no mistake, I AM a New Democrat".

Corporate toadies. The lot of them.

Republicans used social wedge issues to divide the country, Democrats use them to divide the party, and put on a progressive facade.

BumRushDaShow

(128,979 posts)
27. His entire time in office
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:17 PM
Mar 2016

has been a major DU bash-fest, with dozens of fictional scenarios concocted about what he would do that over and over again, were proven wrong.

Sorry if I don't go for that Clint Eastwood universe that too many on DU live in.

 

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts)
22. I still support President Obama because he created the Healthcare system that may save my life
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:01 PM
Mar 2016

one day.

Nitram

(22,801 posts)
23. "Pure corporatist?" What total BS.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:01 PM
Mar 2016

Obama accomplished so much more than anyone expected he could under the circumstances. But are ya'll happy? No. Throw him under the bus because he didn't wave a magic Bernie wand and make everything perfect. We need more progressives in Reality Land.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
28. Jury results.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:19 PM
Mar 2016

EASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

I understand this is a post by a news source not a single DUer, but this has no place here.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:07 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Can we have one day without the purity council proclaiming regular Democrats to be evil Republican tools?
No? Hide this crap anyway
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I strongly disagree with this post but it is expressed civilly and is a fairly common point of view here. When I asked a couple of days ago who would have supported Bernie if he had primaried Obama in 2012, many DUers said they would have. The fact is that DU is well to the left of the Democratic party in general; Hillary's policies are similar to Obama's and she is routinely labeled "not progressive" and a "corporatist" here. If all such posts got hidden there wouldn't be much left.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If you think censoring decent makes this a better place you are mistaken. It makes us look like a cult.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Here. have a Kleenex.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's OK to criticize our dear leader.

21st Century Poet

(254 posts)
32. I can't believe someone alerted this.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:40 PM
Mar 2016

I disagree with what the video says but I cannot believe that someone found it rude or offensive. People's predilection to alerting comments and posts makes it hard to have proper conversations in here sometimes. Some people get offended way too easily.

21st Century Poet

(254 posts)
31. Obama's job is to be President not to be a True Progressive
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:35 PM
Mar 2016

If True Progressives wanted a more progressive nominee than Mr Garland, they should have voted for a Senate majority which is Truly Progressive. The President's job according to the constitution is to nominate someone who is acceptable to the Senate. A Democrat President and a Republican Senate majority will get you centre-left Supreme Court nominees. It's not the president's fault if True Progressives are a minority or if they are too lazy or indifferent to vote. A Senate majority which is Truly Progressive would have got you a Supreme Court nominee who is Truly Progressive. President Obama is doing his job according to the Constitution. Don't try to shift the 'blame' from the voters to the President. The President is just doing his job and his job requires his choices to reflect how the people voted. Vote for a Truly Progressive Senate next time and you will get Truly Progressive Supreme Court nominees.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
39. Obama's DNC head lost 11 Governors, 13 Senators, 69 Reps, 913 state seats, and left the party
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:03 AM
Apr 2016

with 26% of the electorate

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Why Would Any True Progre...