Video & Multimedia

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts) Tue May 31, 2016, 10:35 PM May 2016

It’s Not Just the Speeches: Hillary Clinton Questioned over Son-in-Law’s Ties to Goldman Sachs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=OB0XtrBHyo4

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It’s Not Just the Speeches: Hillary Clinton Questioned over Son-in-Law’s Ties to Goldman Sachs (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich May 2016 OP

This should get her to 60% SmittynMo May 2016 #1

Right! JDPriestly May 2016 #4

Who's documenting this primary? Ned_Devine May 2016 #2

Maybe, just maybe, she simply doesn't know how much a banker invested in her son-in-laws business Midnight Writer May 2016 #3

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)

1. This should get her to 60%

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:51 PM

May 2016

unfavorability. Congrats Hill. This is just unbelievable watching it all crumble around us. Remember,higher unfavorability equals LOW VOTER TURNOUT, which turns into republican victories.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)

4. Right!

Reply to SmittynMo (Reply #1)

Tue May 31, 2016, 11:20 PM

May 2016

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)

2. Who's documenting this primary?

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 11:05 PM

May 2016

I hope someone is doing a Michael Moore style documentary on this one, because it's definitely one for the record books. I mean, we've been witnessing it the whole time dealing with intimidation, slander, disenfranchisement, lying and theft.

Midnight Writer

(21,753 posts)

3. Maybe, just maybe, she simply doesn't know how much a banker invested in her son-in-laws business

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 11:15 PM

May 2016

I think the "she refuses to answer" charge is a wee bit over the top. Perhaps she has her own priorities to attend to right now.

Maybe she is not privy to every financial transaction made by the guy who married her daughter.

Are we now holding her responsible for her son-in-law's business? Should she have stepped in and told her son-in-law that he is forbidden to accept a business investment from the largest business investor in the world?

This seems a little silly to me.

Reply to this discussion