Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1149 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Moment Kim Jong Nam Was Attacked: CCTV Footage (Original Post)
yuiyoshida
Feb 2017
OP
Respectfully, I was speaking of people who are not discerning and specifically
chowder66
Feb 2017
#5
chowder66
(9,081 posts)1. The women thought they were playing a prank...?
....Oh yeah, here's some cloth with liquid on it, put it over his mouth and nose. How funny!
It's a hell of a story but the prank angle is stupefying.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)2. Some prank TV shows are kind of over-the-top
IMHO, the reason they recruited a woman with a YouTube channel as TV producers was that they wanted to make sure they got video of the event to show to Kim Jong Un.
Given that the attack involved manually handling a deadly toxic agent, then it makes sense that the person recruited to do it did not know what they were doing.
She claims they did several dry runs with non-toxic materials.
chowder66
(9,081 posts)3. If so...it's sad that people aren't more discerning. nt
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)4. There are over 7 billion people
I don't think the actions of any one of them are broadly representative of "people" generally.
I believe the press generally describes her as an "entertainment establishment employee", so the prospect of doing something less, um, strenuous for $100 sounds more like a rational economic choice.
chowder66
(9,081 posts)5. Respectfully, I was speaking of people who are not discerning and specifically
any people involved that may have thought this was a prank.
Not a whole population.
Putting a cloth over anyone's face, let alone a strangers face (with or without a financial incentive) should be a red flag.