Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumWhite House Science Division Now EMPTY
I know David Pakman is not popular on DU now; but, listen to what he's saying:
There's no one left at the White House dealing with science issues.
Consider, could it actually be worse if Trump filled those positions with creationists and global warming deniers? We're stuck on the horns of the dilemma now!!!!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 2671 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House Science Division Now EMPTY (Original Post)
LongTomH
Jul 2017
OP
Humans can choose to ignore the laws of physics but, the laws of physics will not ignore
ladjf
Jul 2017
#5
Yea, he's very good, but tRUMP has to go...complete with his anti science values. NOW.
downeastdaniel
Jul 2017
#7
sagesnow
(2,824 posts)1. Why is David Packman persona non grata?
What did I miss?
mdbl
(4,973 posts)6. never heard about this either
teach1st
(5,935 posts)2. I try to stay out of the fray
But regardless how one feels about his show (and I am not a regular viewer, nor do I know about any objections to the show), Mr. Pakman makes good points in this video.
Thanks for posting!
rock
(13,218 posts)3. I like Pakman
Very much. And find his commentary quite precise.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)4. Science policy us not relevant. The economy runs
on flipping land, development, and cheating your contractors and investors. That's where we need policies. And, we don't need patents, either. Just trademarks.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)5. Humans can choose to ignore the laws of physics but, the laws of physics will not ignore
us. That just the way it is.
downeastdaniel
(497 posts)7. Yea, he's very good, but tRUMP has to go...complete with his anti science values. NOW.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)8. That will become the Division Against Science area . He has lots of hucksters to fill it up