Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

lark

(23,099 posts)
2. Wow, that's what I call teaching!
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 07:57 AM
Oct 2017

Amazing! I bet some of those kids eyes were opened and for the first time they understood what's going on with white privilege.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
6. Interesting. And probably true in most instances. But not all.
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 08:37 AM
Oct 2017

Disadvantages can actually cause some kids to develop skills and desire to accomplish. Persistence, working hard, facing adversity which everyone does. Not always, but sometimes. So not quite accurate that ALL have "2 steps forward" for all of those things. It's more complicated than that. A rich kid may have to take 2 steps back, if he meets adversity along the way, since he doesn't have the skills to deal with it.

Saviolo

(3,282 posts)
8. Individual outliers will always exist
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 09:29 AM
Oct 2017

Privilege is systemic.

POC are more likely to have interactions with police, even if those interactions do not lead to an arrest or a charge, the very fact that an officer spoke to you can be enough to bar entry to some jobs. It's been quite a problem here in Toronto, Canada with the police's carding program. If a police officer comes up to you and asks for your ID and you provide it, that is recorded on your police record as "police interaction" which will show up on a background check. Also, if you're seen in the company of someone who has had a police interaction, you may be automatically listed among "known associates." Check here.

And that second scenario where the rich kid may have to take 2 steps back? It worked in favour of that kid who was driving (underage) drunk on stolen beer and and killed four people. He received 10 years probation and no jail time due to the defense of "affluenza." His lawyers argued that he had never faced consequences for his actions and was unable to link his actions with consequences. (look up Ethan Couch for this one)

BumRushDaShow

(128,979 posts)
9. "A rich kid may have to take 2 steps back, if he meets adversity along the way"
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 09:34 AM
Oct 2017

Not true. Look at the current occupant of the WH. "Daddy" pays for someone else to "deal with that adversity" (as Drumpf's father did while he was alive). That is the idea around that term "affluenza".

There are some wealthy (often Quaker) boarding schools that tried to teach the concepts of advantage and "plain living" so that the attendees would learn the lessons of frugality and eschewing conspicuous consumption. But there are whole swaths of the "noveau riche" who neither know nor learn any such thing.

BumRushDaShow

(128,979 posts)
14. Only if the purpose is to teach "a life lesson"
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 10:11 AM
Oct 2017

Otherwise the driven ones are determined to protect their progeny from the wolves at any cost, knowing how easy it is to fail and fall back to earth, enabling "someone else" to take their place.

NJCher

(35,669 posts)
13. that made me feel so sad
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 10:08 AM
Oct 2017

when they showed the faces of those left behind.

This type of exercise is called "experiential learning." IMO, it is more effective than traditional methods of teaching. It is used mostly with adult education, but now it is finding its way into the middle and high school curriculum.


Cher

Neema

(1,151 posts)
15. I have to admit, this bothers me. White privilege is so much more complex than this.
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 07:16 PM
Oct 2017

Last edited Thu Oct 12, 2017, 08:22 PM - Edit history (1)

I appreciate the attempt at a lesson in privilege but it feels a little humiliating to me. And it seems based on the assumption that all POC are poor and live in broken homes.

Plenty of wealthy, educated POC still get stopped by the police for no reason, and still are presumed guilty unless proven otherwise. Even with two parents and food on the table and access to better education, POC still have to work harder to overcome bias. They still have potential employers toss their resumes because their names sound too "ethnic" or to "urban." They still get passed over for promotions. They still have people call the 911 on them for walking down the street. They still have security following them around a store assuming their going to steal something.



JI7

(89,249 posts)
16. i feel the same way
Sun Oct 15, 2017, 05:31 AM
Oct 2017

studies have shown that white people with fewer qualifications will still be more likely to be hired than a black person with far more qualifications/education etc.

that's what white privilege is.

a black kid who comes from a home with 2 parents and is economically well off and does well in school will still be dealing with shitty cops more than a white person with a criminal background . just becuase of race.

Neema

(1,151 posts)
17. Thank you. I was starting to feel like I was taking crazy pills. A couple of my friends have
Mon Oct 16, 2017, 12:11 PM
Oct 2017

posted this on FB and are getting all kinds of love for it. I'm left scratching my head. It bothers me more on a second viewing. The simplification of the issue gets it fundamentally wrong in my opinion. It's a simplification that leads people to believe that NFL players who kneel are spoiled brats who have nothing to complain about and no longer have to deal with racism and white privilege.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»If someone doesn't unders...