Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumGrasswire2
(13,569 posts)....at the campaign level. Don't put anyone through whose father was Ku Klux Klan, or whose family came to America unlawfully within two generations, or who won't release tax returns, or whose family member served in a war against the U.S., or who can't pass FBI background check comparable to top security clearance. Something like that.
Haven't we learned some lessons this go-round? We've been naive.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)Judgment due to family background ? This gets into some questionable territory.
Grasswire2
(13,569 posts)....but vetting at the campaigns level --- voluntary vetting and publishing of the information.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)Should a crazy relative, even one generation back, be relevant? The candidate is the important one in any normal situation. That's my point; no argument other wise.
dubyadiprecession
(5,707 posts)..without losing the popular vote. This alone, probably drove those Republicans batshit crazy!
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)As an English teacher/ reading specialist, I always thought it was the most important, underlying concept in all learning, other than (but still not in all cases) in the math/science fields where there are already proven concepts. So many adults are threatened by their children's questioning their beliefs, but I see here another factor: unquestioning belief by some adults that they ARE critical thinkers while making exceptions for their long cherished prejudices.
Kajun Gal
(1,907 posts)Crowman2009
(2,495 posts)And that's to cherry pick the shit out of it! But if you tell them that the 2nd Amendment should be changed, then they'll lose their shit.