Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

TexasTowelie

(112,204 posts) Wed Jan 25, 2023, 05:33 PM Jan 2023

Supreme Court Justices Didn't Have to Sign Affidavits During Leaker Investigation! - Luke Beasley

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Justices Didn't Have to Sign Affidavits During Leaker Investigation! - Luke Beasley (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jan 2023 OP

Wouldn't have done any good as we know some of them have lied under oath. republianmushroom Jan 2023 #1

The pass Snackshack Jan 2023 #2

republianmushroom

(13,594 posts)

1. Wouldn't have done any good as we know some of them have lied under oath.

Reply to TexasTowelie (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2023, 05:36 PM

Jan 2023

Snackshack

(2,541 posts)

2. The pass

Reply to TexasTowelie (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2023, 05:39 PM

Jan 2023

These people get on being an ethical / decent phucking human needs to be ended. If anything a SCOTUS Justice should have to adhere to a higher level of ethics than a circuit or appellate judge. Yet somehow as one climbs the judicial ladder to a top spot they are allowed to be as ethically compromised and partisan as they like. That is insane.

Reply to this discussion