Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 579 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How bridges were constructed over 100 years ago (Original Post)
demmiblue
May 2019
OP
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)1. It wasn't that much different 50 years ago
OSHA wasn't passed until 1970 and prior to that safety regulations were almost exclusively up to states and local jurisdictions. Naturally the GOP fought OSHA and tried to water it down, just as they are still doing today.
hunter
(38,311 posts)2. "Cheating Death": Worker Safety During Construction of the Golden Gate Bridge
The era of reckless daredevilry among bridgemen came to an end with the construction of the Golden Gate Bridge, as Chief Engineer Joseph Strauss insisted on a rigid safety code, supported by the latest safety innovations.
Despite the high winds, churning currents, and towering heights that challenged the work, Strauss was determined to buck the industrys deadly average of one fatality per million dollars spent on a construction project.
On the Golden Gate Bridge, we had the idea we could cheat death by providing every known safety device for workers, he wrote in 1937 for The Saturday Evening Post. To the annoyance of the daredevils who loved to stunt at the end of the cables, far out in space, we fired any man we caught stunting on the job.
According to Stephen Cassadys Spanning the Gate (pg 104), The Golden Gate was not the first big job to feature hard hats and safety lines as some have claimed. But it was the first to enforce their use with the threat of dismissal.
--more--
http://goldengatebridge.org/research/CheatingDeath.php
Despite the high winds, churning currents, and towering heights that challenged the work, Strauss was determined to buck the industrys deadly average of one fatality per million dollars spent on a construction project.
On the Golden Gate Bridge, we had the idea we could cheat death by providing every known safety device for workers, he wrote in 1937 for The Saturday Evening Post. To the annoyance of the daredevils who loved to stunt at the end of the cables, far out in space, we fired any man we caught stunting on the job.
According to Stephen Cassadys Spanning the Gate (pg 104), The Golden Gate was not the first big job to feature hard hats and safety lines as some have claimed. But it was the first to enforce their use with the threat of dismissal.
--more--
http://goldengatebridge.org/research/CheatingDeath.php
There's still a lot of "macho" get-the-job-done attitude on many construction sites today and it's bullshit now as it was then.
mopinko
(70,102 posts)3. ironworkers are all a little nuts.
Fla Dem
(23,666 posts)4. Fearless!