Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 338 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How much deeper would the ocean be without (Original Post)
Floyd R. Turbo
Jul 2019
OP
And why haven't scientists though to combat rising sea levels by throwing sponges into the ocean??
PoliticAverse
Jul 2019
#3
dhill926
(16,339 posts)1. Steven Wright would be proud....
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)2. That depends on how much was soaked up.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)3. And why haven't scientists though to combat rising sea levels by throwing sponges into the ocean??
sl8
(13,781 posts)4. Ooh, we got ourselves a real deep thinker here.
Well, la-dee-dah.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)5. But think of all the fish and marine mamals
Think of their combined mass displacing all that water. Remove them, and you would have just a drop!