The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsThis is outright cool as h*ck
Wonder of Science (@wonderofscience) Tweeted:
Incredible footage of Saturn rising from behind the Moon during a lunar occultation, captured from a ground based telescope by amateur astronomer Jan Koet.
Source: https://t.co/4VqMDf8GEA https://t.co/f5MLB4joqa
Link to tweet
LaurenOlimina
(1,165 posts)Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)irisblue
(32,973 posts)And I stole that from at dog_rates
🐾
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)underpants
(182,799 posts)sdfernando
(4,935 posts)at Titan you just make out the top of the Enterprise emerging from the gaseous clouds.
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)sl8
(13,767 posts)That is really cool. Thanks.
wysimdnwyg
(2,231 posts)I'm certain that Saturn doesn't look that big from the moon, so I'm wondering how much of the increase in size is due to zooming in from the Earth-based camera, and how much is due to the lensing effect of gravity.
Fla Dem
(23,661 posts)the telescope had to be very powerful.
CloudWatcher
(1,848 posts)While gravitational lensing is really cool, it's not a factor in this video. The distortion by the moon's gravity is very tiny. The distortion by the Sun was just enough to barely notice in timings of observations of Mercury. Actual lensing kinda requires galaxy sized masses.
Saturn is really pretty visible when looked at through even a smallish telescope. I don't think there are any tricks going on here other than having an appropriate level of magnification by the telescope.
wysimdnwyg
(2,231 posts)I know just enough about astronomy to have good questions, but not enough to know the answers. I even took an astronomy class as a freshman in college, but that was a very long time ago. And my telescope, such as it is, hasn't seen the outside of the box in many years.
It does make sense that the optics of viewing through a telescope would amplify the image of Saturn enough that it looks very close, despite it's likely actual appearance from the moon as little more than a large star (similar to how it appears from Earth).
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,490 posts)Interpreted from German (?):
Takes some pretty good patience and precise timing as well, though.......
2naSalit
(86,597 posts)CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)Why can't our planet be round too?
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)Ever since their leading proponent augured into the California desert the other day.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)There are probably many more out there. They just don't have their own Wikipedia page.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)Thompson didn't come from monkeys. Monkeys are intelligent.
RestoreAmerica2020
(3,435 posts)MrModerate
(9,753 posts)H2O Man
(73,537 posts)Bayard
(22,068 posts)Our moon birthing a little planet...
chowder66
(9,067 posts)HotTeaBag
(1,206 posts)Cool though.
Dem2theMax
(9,651 posts)Awe. Awe of the universe.
Jack-o-Lantern
(967 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,590 posts)KY_EnviroGuy
(14,490 posts)May 31, 2009
Saturnus 22 mei 2007 wederverschijning na occultatie door de Maan. Opname gemaakt met 18cm Astro Physics 180EDT, een Meade 5000 3x Barlow en een ToUcam2. Het verkregen resultaat werd nabewerkt, om de helderheid van de zwakke Saturnus wat op te krikken. De video verloopt twee maal zo snel als het in werkelijkheid was.
Saturnus May 22 2007 reappears after occultation by the Moon. Video was made by a 18cm Astro Physics 180EDT, a Meade 5000 3x Barlow and a ToUcam2. Some afterprocessing was done, to push the brightness of the faint Saturn to match that of the Moon. The video passes twice as fast as it was in reality.
Thanks for posting, Irisblue...........