Actor tells fans to 'never forget' Melania and Trump are 'a hooker and a con man'

[Submariner]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NEVER FORGET <a href="https://t.co/SAcwdHeE1X">pic.twitter.com/SAcwdHeE1X</a></p>— MichaelRapaport (@MichaelRapaport) <a href="

Link to tweet

?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 11, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/actor-tells-fans-to-never-forget-melania-and-trump-are-a-hooker-and-a-con-man

Ain't that the truth.

[Texaswitchy]

1. One of Jeff's girls.

Not by accident.

[CatMor]

2. I dont know what it is about her ....

that she always looks plain stupid.

[Rorey]

8. The way she sounds matches the way she looks.

I don't know how anyone can believe she's intelligent.

She fits right in with that family.

[CatMor]

13. That she does, fits right in.

[subana]

16. there's a reason why she tried to steal Michelle Obama's speech!

because she couldn't write one of her own!!

[Warpy]

12. Plastic surgery and bad makeup

calculated to make her look unattainable.. She was very pretty when she was a kid and she's been photographed at school appearances without that Natasha Fatale makeup and her genuine smile with the kids is a nice one.

(for the culturally deprived, Natasha Fatale was Boris Badenov's sidekick in the old Rocky & Bullwinkle cartoons)

[The_REAL_Ecumenist]

18. Hi Warpy! LOVE Rocky & Bullwinkle...& I FOUND the ENTIRE series on Youtube...

They even have SUPERCHICKEN! LOL!! A Belated Birthday gift from God...

[Warpy]

31. I have avoided looking thus far

because all I need is another time suck.

[The_REAL_Ecumenist]

32. LOL!! I'm recovering from presumptive CV19 AND a flare of Sarcoidosis because my effed-up

immune system just does not know when to shut the hell up...YAY!! So, I have lots O'Time...Often awake at night so, ROCKY & BULLWINKLE & {{{{{SUPERCHICKEN}}}} are available.... Happy Easter, honey & please stay safe as much as possible, you're one of my favourite DU'er's Trust me, I wouldn't wish CV19 on my worst enemy & definitely not you. I got sick beginning the last week of December & just started to slow down coughing myself dizzy....Take care..

[Warpy]

35. I always adored Superchicken

and I'm also recovering from "presumptive." The RA flare hasn't turned up yet.

I need to visit a supermarket and see if the locusts have left any food on the shelves. I'm OK on TP, and if it runs out I've got newspaper and I'm not afraid to use it.

[captain queeg]

53. I can't quite remember Super Chicken though part of the theme song comes to mind

[Warpy]

56. The theme made my mother want to kick the TV

[captain queeg]

57. I remember the beat, and squa-----ck for super chicken.

[NurseJackie]

41. A recent photo of Melanie:

[TNNurse]

40. She sounds and looks unhappy

and I really do not care.

[niyad]

3. Not that I give a damn about trophy wife/handler, but she looks about ready to cry or throw up.

[msongs]

4. one wonders why...

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

6. Wouldn't you?

[3catwoman3]

15. That is how I would look and feel if Trump were...

...that close to me.

[Kitchari]

20. She always looks drugged

High on something

[Chakaconcarne]

47. She has the look of.... What the hell am I doing?

[AllaN01Bear]

5. ding ding ding ding. this the pediofille in chief.

[Grokenstein]

7. Technically, he's just the middleman.

[maxrandb]

9. A Hooker and a Conman walk into the White House

That's it... that's the punchline.

[Kaiserguy]

38. The puncch line

America got _ _ _ _

[pecosbob]

10. Sounds like a New Yorker to me

“Why don’t you send your f---ing son, dick stain Donald Trump Jr., big-toothed Eric Trump, little f---ing Barron, f---ing Ivanka, junkyard Jared — let them go out there and test the f---ing waters,” Rapaport said. “Let them see if shit is sweet. Let them take the cars, the trains, the buses, the Amtraks, let them play in the park. And if everything’s good after five days of them playing out there in the streets, we’ll all go back to [work].”

“F---ing pig — the real people want to get back to work ASAP? You never worked a f---ing day in your life. You’re worried about the next four years? You need to be worried about the next four days, motherf---er. You need to be worried about the next four weeks — the next four months, you motherf---er. You are the worst possible motherf---er we could have in power, making decisions right now," he said.

Eloquent? No, but to the point.

[SunSeeker]

25. Perfectly said.

[DinahMoeHum]

44. The whole profanity-laced tirade is voiced below

Link to tweet

#newrostrong

[Alliepoo]

52. Just followed him!

[paleotn]

11. A new wrinkle on the old idea...

that in America, anyone can aspire to become president. I don't think I'll ever think of that old saw quite the same way again.

[FailureToCommunicate]

19. Made me think of this...

[niyad]

30. Bill Clinton, yes. Barack Obama, yes. Bodybags was born with a fake silver spoon.

[Earth Bound Misfit]

14. Rappaport despises Drumpf with every fibre of his being...

as do I.

[SunSeeker]

26. +1

[ALBliberal]

17. When the money dries up they will be sellonr

Their stories verified by journalists. Believe me(yes sarcasm).

[Evolve Dammit]

21. She is his Russian handler. No more, no less.

[DemoTex]

45. THIS!!! ABSOLUTELY!!!

I've said it all along. She was groomed for the job. Trump might have thought she was a hooker, and he paid with his pitiful soul.

[Capt. America]

22. Not to be a killjoy, but we didn't like it when they went after Michelle.

I think wives and kids (not ones in the political arena or minors) should be targets.

[AnotherMother4Peace]

27. "I don't really care, do u?" was enblazoned across her back, when she visited immigrant children

in her husband's cages. Did Michelle do anything like that? - No. The trumps are cruel, sadistically cruel.

[SunSeeker]

28. We did not like it because it was baseless and drenched in racism and sexism.

First ladies are public figures and are fair game for valid criticism.

Minor children of course should be off limits.

[diva77]

34. She was hawking her jewelry as soon as she became

first "lady" - I don't think it's off limits to call out this violation -- profiteering off her public position

[Scarsdale]

36. Well, she made a living

profiteering off her "private positions" didn't she? Surely she can't do THAT as "Forst Lay-Dee"? She fits perfectly with this fake rich family, who will do anything for money. Anything apart from REAL work, that is.

[AtheistCrusader]

49. That went out the window for me when she went to visit children in cages wearing this.

[Wawannabe]

51. See post 21

Very plausible in my estimation.

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

23. She filed a defamation suit overseas when someone said that.

Legal standards are a bit higher in the States so I wonder if she'll try to stop this guy.

[oldsoftie]

46. Yes, the Daily Mail agreed to pay damages & issue an apology. Their statement:

"The Mail Online website and the Daily Mail newspaper published an article on 20th August 2016 about Melania Trump which questioned the nature of her work as a professional model, and republished allegations that she provided services beyond simply modelling. The article included statements that Mrs. Trump denied the allegations and Paulo Zampolli, who ran the modelling agency, also denied the allegations, and the article also stated that there was no evidence to support the allegations. The article also claimed that Mr and Mrs Trump may have met three years before they actually met, and 'staged' their actual meeting as a 'ruse.'
We accept that these allegations about Mrs Trump are not true and we retract and withdraw them. We apologise to Mrs Trump for any distress that our publication caused her. To settle Mrs Trump's two lawsuits against us, we have agreed to pay her damages and costs."

[Major Nikon]

58. You can tell by their statement it was nothing more than giving into extortion

All the Daily Mail did was report the facts of the story. They did their own investigation and reported the facts of those findings.

Trump simply did what Trump does which is to file frivolous lawsuits knowing full well the cost of defense is going to exceed what they are demanding. It's a shame that the Daily Mail conceded and it's an even bigger shame that other media outlets didn't do a better job of defending them.

[oldsoftie]

59. How can you see it that way? They admitted what they published wasnt true.

"We accept that these allegations about Mrs Trump are not true and we retract and withdraw them. We apologise to Mrs Trump for any distress that our publication caused her"

There's no wiggle room there. And the Daily Mail is hardly a poor publication.

Thats not the standard "we neither admit nor deny any responsibility for "X""

[Major Nikon]

60. That's not what they admitted

Last edited Tue Apr 14, 2020, 02:00 AM - Edit history (1)

"We accept that these allegations about Mrs Trump are not true" is not the same thing as admitting what they published wasn't true.

The so-called "wiggle room" can be found in the first paragraph of the apology.

The Mail Online website and the Daily Mail newspaper published an article on 20th August 2016 about Melania Trump which questioned the nature of her work as a professional model, and republished allegations that she provided services beyond simply modelling. The article included statements that Mrs. Trump denied the allegations and Paulo Zampolli, who ran the modelling agency, also denied the allegations, and the article also stated that there was no evidence to support the allegations. The article also claimed that Mr and Mrs Trump may have met three years before they actually met, and "staged" their actual meeting as a "ruse."

The Daily Mail didn't make those allegations and they never admitted to making those allegations. They printed that others had made those allegations which is factually correct. They also printed they found no evidence to support those allegations, and they printed that Melania had denied those allegations. If anything the Daily Mail did the Trumps a service by printing there was no evidence found to support them.

The tactical mistake the Daily Mail made was to retract the story following a demand letter from Trump long before the lawsuit was ever filed. There was nothing to retract. They reported the facts.

The reason the Daily Mail settled the lawsuit is because after changing venues, Trump's lawyers finally found a judge who was either sympathetic to their cause or was afraid of Trump's legal team and who didn't throw out the lawsuit in the first round which should have happened. The fact that it didn't is a travesty and a disservice to the free press which Trump has been attacking since before he even got in office and has continued to do every day since.

[oldsoftie]

61. But wouldnt that be just like reporting you're a killer "even though we have no evidence he's one"

With all the denials as well as admitting they had no evidence to back any of the claims up, they STILL printed the article. I say they got what they deserved, what little money it cost them anyway. And newspaper or TV news, whatever, should know better than to put out something that weak.
And as I said in another post, why do you have to make shit up about the TRUMPS?? They GIVE you plenty of fodder to print!!

[Major Nikon]

62. How many news outlets posted stories about Pizzagate?

Is it fair to say all the major ones? Your reasoning just doesn’t hold up.

The Daily Mail didn’t “make shit up”. Period. Why are you making that shit up?

[oldsoftie]

63. What I saw about "pizzagate" was that it was a conspiracy theory & a hoax. Which was true.

Unless you read far right shit; and then THEY should have been sued as well for spreading false stories. But someone needs to stand up when it happens. The scandal sheets no longer publish gay stories about Tom Cruise, because he sued the shit out of one of them.

The DM should have known better than to print what they did. They did it because they knew it would get readers; nothing else.
You dont see it that way, fine.

[Major Nikon]

64. Looks a lot like doublethink

If the Daily Mail was at fault for reporting on an allegation and pointing out there's no evidence for it, then every other news outlet is at fault for doing the same thing. Objectivity requires consistency of thought.

Why else would any for-profit news outlet publish anything if not to get readers?

[Upthevibe]

24. I just went to twitter to

follow him- Michael Rapaport. I've always liked his fearlessness and he absolutely channels my feelings.

[SunSeeker]

29. K & R & Retweeted!

[Grasswire2]

33. we haven't seen Melania since the virus hit. nt

[Scarsdale]

37. She made a public service video

holding a mask, telling us "Ve should all vear von" Posing as though she really was a supermodel (she wasn't) She finally put one on, and everyone told her to get her old man to wear it.

[Maxheader]

39. There is no forgiveness...

In me for what it's done....But then I felt the same way about ray gun ronny and shrub.

During the run up to their 2nd election..

[Alex Blaine Layder]

42. she looks like a human/alien hybrid

Slovenian plus reptilian

[colsohlibgal]

43. Michael Gets Down To the Truth

It is beyond stunning and dumb that Republicans keep whining about Hunter Biden...as Bloomberg and others have stated, you do that and it will be open season on the Trump family and associates who have taken grifting to a whole new level.

So go there you Creeps please, by all means, open that door.

[Marcuse]

48. You remind me of "The First Lady of the Evening" bit from a classically bad movie.

Blank until :23

[Wawannabe]

50. I had a pang of sympathy for her at inauguration

It’s LONG gone! The irony of her so called bully campaign is HUGE. Her being married to the bully in the WH and all. Omg!

First Slut of the US (FSOTUS)

[ahlnord]

54. predictable

This has predictably devolved into a thread about Melania. Never forget, Trump is not only a conman -- he is owned by Russia. He would still be a great danger to our country without the hooker; but Melania without Trump is a nobody. She is not a threat to us, but attracts the most derision here!

[SammyWinstonJack]

55. Wasted. But then one would almost have to be wrt tRump