Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 521 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Royal couple introduces their new little.......cat? (Original Post)
Lady Freedom Returns
Oct 2021
OP
I thought they were giving up the royal bit and giving up endless media self promotion nt
msongs
Oct 2021
#1
Who are these people? When I read "Royal couple" I thought this was going to be about...
PoliticAverse
Oct 2021
#4
Uggh.... As if the British Royals (or former Royals) weren't enough... Kardashians? Ugggh.
hlthe2b
Oct 2021
#6
For Crying Out Loud! It's OwlKitty!!! I love OwlKitty's parodies and satire!!
yellowdogintexas
Oct 2021
#7
msongs
(67,493 posts)1. I thought they were giving up the royal bit and giving up endless media self promotion nt
bbernardini
(9,939 posts)3. I like to think they're doing it to show how stupid the press is.
No matter what they say or do, the press will be there to eat it up.
Skittles
(153,275 posts)5. fat chance
seeing them on TV whining during a pandemic - disgusting
LakeArenal
(28,864 posts)2. Kids should have pets
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)4. Who are these people? When I read "Royal couple" I thought this was going to be about...
some Kardashians.
hlthe2b
(102,501 posts)6. Uggh.... As if the British Royals (or former Royals) weren't enough... Kardashians? Ugggh.
Now, THAT deserves a
Skittles
(153,275 posts)8. what the fuck is with those girls
they don't have enough money, they have to be in UNDERWEAR and CANDY CRUSH commercials? I tell you it's the one thing I absolutely despise about the younger generation, that they made celebrities out of such vapid, no-talent people...UGH
hlthe2b
(102,501 posts)11. Yes. Me too. Vacuous celebrities-- based on nothing.
yellowdogintexas
(22,288 posts)7. For Crying Out Loud! It's OwlKitty!!! I love OwlKitty's parodies and satire!!
I think it is totally in keeping with the OwlKitty Philosophy.
I do not suspect H & M instigated it; more than likely the OwlKitty Inc. folks asked permission to use it IF it is not classified as public domain.
hlthe2b
(102,501 posts)9. Yes. I'm sure this is parody.
Lady Freedom Returns
(14,120 posts)10. I've been posting a few lately.
My favorite is still Endgame with OwlKitty.
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,496 posts)12. I ❤️ Owlkitty
My favorite is the cat dad one.