The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsTwo 5" pizzas instead of one 9" pizza? I think not: (Twitter)
And, as the top Reddit comment points out, for comparison purposes, you don't even need to use pi - just compare the square of the radii (or diameters, if that's easier). Easy-peasy.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
roychandan
@cretiredroy
·
I ordered a 9-inch Pizza.
After a while, the waiter brought two 5-inch pizzas and said, the 9-inch pizza was not available and he was giving me two 5-inches Pizzas instead, and that I am getting 1 inch more for free!
I requested the waiter to call the owner.
[...]
I gave him the mathematical formula to calculate the area of a circle.
Circle Area = π r²
where π = 3.1415926,
r is the radius of the circle.
So, a 9-inch circle area = 63.62 sq.in.
while a 5-inch circle area is 19.63 sq.in.
[...]
The two 5-inch circle areas add up to 39.26 sq.in .
I said that even if he gave three pizzas, I would still lose-out.
"How can you say you are giving me an extra inch for free?"
The owner was speechless.
He finally gave me 4 pizzas.
Take Maths seriously!
Girard442
(6,070 posts)sl8
(13,767 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)Apple Pizzas instead of Apple Pies! English the language that exists outside of reality,
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Reference the song "Amore".
Further, in English we say "Pies are ..." because the noun and the verb must agree as to plurality.
In English we write "Pizzas are round", not "Pizza sre round" (double mistake).
callous taoboy
(4,585 posts)VWolf
(3,944 posts)callous taoboy
(4,585 posts)sl8
(13,767 posts)It's like an earworm.
...when he finishes his meal, the waiter approaches and says "and will monsieur be having dessert?"
"I think not" Descartes replies.
Poof! He disappears.
Descartes coined the phrase "cogito, ergo sum" (Latin: I think, therefore I am).
Grokenstein
(5,722 posts)Last edited Fri Jul 1, 2022, 02:16 PM - Edit history (1)
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar who could think you under the table
David Hume could out-consume Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel
And Wittgenstein was a beery swine who was just as sloshed as Schlegel
There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya 'bout the raising of the wrist
Socrates, himself, was permanently pissed
John Stuart Mill, of his own free will, on half a pint of shandy was particularly ill
Plato, they say, could stick it away, half a crate of whiskey every day
Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle, Hobbes was fond of his dram
And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart: "I drink, therefore I am."
Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed...
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed
sl8
(13,767 posts)6.9K Likes
826,213 Views
2014 Oct 13
Monty Python - Bruce's Philosophers Song (Bruce's Song) {Official Lyric Video]
Subscribe to the Official Monty Python Channel here - http://smarturl.it/SubscribeToPython
Visit the official Monty Python store - http://smarturl.it/MontyPythonStores
Visit the NEW Monty Python iTunes store - http://smarturl.it/MontyPython1D5TGitun
Sing along to 'Bruce's Song' with this official karaoke style Monty Python lyric video.
[...]
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)Response to sl8 (Original post)
Roy Rolling This message was self-deleted by its author.
sl8
(13,767 posts)He identified the pizzas by their diameters (5" and 9" ), but used the radii (2.5" and 4.5" ) to calculate their areas.
What's the issue?
Rabrrrrrr
(58,349 posts)a) do you have proof it didn't happen
b) what are you talking about with diameter/radius? The 9" pizza has a radius of 4.5", which works out to the 63.6 sq. inches the tweeter came up with. The 5" pizza has a 2.5" radius, which works out to the 19.7 sq. inches the tweeter came up with.
And it's weird you'd say that the math is correct while complaining it's wrong.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)an a@@hole! Idjiot probably didn't even tip.
Laha
(407 posts)being an asshole?
dsc
(52,161 posts)He was being rather seriously ripped off. 50/81 is only a bit over 60%. If I paid for 10 gallons of gas and got only 6 I would be exceptionally unhappy.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Teaching somebody something important while getting proper value for money is NOT being an asshole.
Losing about half the pizza because of being worried about appearances is being a loser.
I do NOT buy your premise that they were "looking like an asshole".
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)You can explain reality (mathematics) in a pleasant non-demeaning way and that is NOT being an asshole.
If you shout or use profanity or insult the person, THAT is being an asshole. None of that is part of the story and I'm sure the math guy did none of that.
mobeau69
(11,144 posts)years before I started. Anyway it didnt take long to figure out that she was and had been shorting everyone on pay probably for her entire time as manager!
We would fill out our time card each day and give them to her at the end of the week. If you worke part of an hour (say 4 1/2) she would think 4 hours and 30 minutes and take the hourly at rate x 1.3. LOL. I had a hard time explaining to her that 30 minutes is .5 hours. She wasnt happy with me!
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)I go by thickness.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)Pobeka
(4,999 posts)When you look at a section of a tree trunk, and examine its rings, the width of the rings generally becomes smaller and smaller as you move from the pith to the bark.
And the naive assumption is the tree is is slowing down in growth. But the mathematical reality (for a while) is the tree is actually accumulating more area of wood in one of those narrow outer rings than a wider ring near the pith.
Even trees can't avoid math.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)... about ring width as a function of age.
But it is not as obvious as you might think, since older trees counteract the raw math effect by being bigger and having more leaf mass and root mass that are feeding more nutrients and producing more food that builds the wood.
However, the observations of tree ring widths confirm that there is indeed a trend to smaller rings as trees age.
Pobeka
(4,999 posts)You can sort of think of it as a the ratio of leaf mass to the "sheath" of wood that will be laid down on the entire surface of the tree (from groundline to the tip).
The volume of this new annual sheath increases each year, hits a maximum, and then drops off. Physics gets in the way too -- water has to be pumped up via cellular processes from the root to the tree tip.
sindri
(37 posts)I have math teacher friends and I will tell them this story for them to share with their kiddos
sl8
(13,767 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)"just compare the square of the radii (or diameters, if that's easier)"
using radius:
6^2 = 36
8^2 = 64
36/64 = 56.25%
i.e. it's often worth a significant upcharge to go from 12" to 16".
most XL pies are 18"
9^2 = 81
64/81 = 79%
don't spend much more for an XL vs Large.
Martin Eden
(12,866 posts)He said better make it 6, I'm not that hungry.
Polybius
(15,411 posts)I would have hated a customer like this lol.
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)I come to the Underground every day...