Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsMerriam Webster: The fight for 'irregardless'.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
?t=XNrHzxlDcv4lJBu_HWytWA&s=19
Link to tweet
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Merriam Webster: The fight for 'irregardless'. (Original Post)
Tomconroy
May 2023
OP
When they bowed to Bush* inability to pronounce "nuclear" to include an alternative
hlthe2b
May 2023
#2
With no regard, I'm going to take a safe position on it and not worry about it.
keithbvadu2
May 2023
#4
markie
(23,890 posts)1. ok, I'm happy
hlthe2b
(112,922 posts)2. When they bowed to Bush* inability to pronounce "nuclear" to include an alternative
pronunciation, "nucular," I finally let my annoyance with their rewarding such mistakes, go.
Life is too short. And English, as a language, is always changing.
malthaussen
(18,427 posts)5. I felt the same way about Herbert Hoover and "normalcy."
But I have discovered, to my great dismay, that "normalcy" has also been around a long time, and used by many, so as much as I hate it, I cannot condemn it.
-- Mal
brer cat
(27,373 posts)3. It's an irritant to me, but I don't fault M-W
and will try to be happy.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)4. With no regard, I'm going to take a safe position on it and not worry about it.

JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,607 posts)6. I could care less.