Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ashling

(25,771 posts)
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 01:13 AM Mar 2014

World Wildlife ad begs the question(s)

According to the World Wildlife fund, there are only two possible reasons to love tigers:

1) Because they are the most magnificent of the great cats

or

2) Some other reason I have already forgotten



There is no third option

which begs the question:

is it ever appropriate to not love tigers?

This ad came on tv this evening and my daughter laughed at it and suggested this logical fallacy

I chimed in that I had thought that but that I was afraid to say anything because it would suggest some sort of mysfelineogeny.

So, what happens if you don't particularly like tigers? ... not that I know anyone who does not like tigers or, for that matter, is anti-tiger.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
World Wildlife ad begs the question(s) (Original Post) ashling Mar 2014 OP
If a tiger ate your dog, or if... TreasonousBastard Mar 2014 #1
This WWF tiger ad promo thingee ashling Mar 2014 #2
No doubt you can love your tiger as you can love... TreasonousBastard Mar 2014 #3
I have mixed feelings about it. frogmarch Mar 2014 #4

ashling

(25,771 posts)
2. This WWF tiger ad promo thingee
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 11:56 AM
Mar 2014

gives you that opportunity. You can "symbolically adopt" a tiger ... by sending them money



they don't say whether or not you will get a picture of your tiger . . .

or if your tiger will write you every month . . .


but still they question - put in terms of your suggestion - is it possible to dislike tigers from afar?

not necessarily hate them of course, but just not love them as the ad implies ...

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
3. No doubt you can love your tiger as you can love...
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 12:22 PM
Mar 2014

that other charity's child in some third world pit of misery that you'll never see.

But, I couldn't help thinking of this story:

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast/10/04/nyc.tiger/index.html?_s=PM:US

NEW YORK (CNN) -- A man who kept a 400- to 500-pound Bengal tiger and a 3-foot alligator as roommates in his Harlem apartment was in custody Sunday, charged with reckless endangerment, police said.

<...>

Police talked with a neighbor who said the man in the apartment owned a tiger. A fourth-floor resident complained that urine had seeped through her ceiling from Yates' apartment, Kelly said.

Still trying to determine what they were dealing with, police cut a hole in Yates' door.

"An officer who was guarding the apartment looked through the hole and indeed saw the large tiger pass by the open hole," Kelly said.

Larry Wallach, a tiger specialist from Suffolk County who assisted the police, said the orange tiger looked well-fed and in "great shape."

<...>

frogmarch

(12,153 posts)
4. I have mixed feelings about it.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 01:33 PM
Mar 2014
http://thediplomat.com/2014/02/man-eating-tigers-terrorize-northern-india-leaving-10-dead/

Excerpt:

February 13, 2014

Man-Eating Tigers Terrorize Northern India, Leaving 10 Dead
The six-week rampage may, albeit grimly, highlight the success of conservation efforts.


Villagers in northern India have been living in fear for nearly a month and a half, as a pair of man-eating tigers claimed their tenth human victim. While a male tiger may have been responsible for one or two of the deaths, a rogue tigress likely killed the rest. All of the attacks took place in or near Jim Corbett National Park, India’s oldest national park, which also serves as a refuge for the endangered Bengal tigers – signaling a grisly side-effect of successful conservation efforts.

A 50-year-old man who was mauled to death while collecting firewood on Sunday night became the female cat’s latest prey.

“The animal ate parts of the man’s leg and abdomen before being scared away by villagers waving shovels and metal rods,” reported AP.

Earlier that day, around noon, a 45-year-old irrigation worker was also killed – perhaps by the male tiger, which was also blamed for the death of a woman in January. Workers who came to his aid after hearing screams found that the man – who had stopped by the roadside to relieve himself – had been dragged more than 18 meters into the forest.

News of the fatal attack prompted local residents, scared and angry after failed attempts to catch the man-eaters, to occupy a national forestry department office to demand protection and compensation for victims’ families.

National park director Samir Sinha told The Times of India that the families would receive about $4,000 in bereavement funds.

All of the ten attacks took place in Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh across a span of roughly 130 kilometers.

“India is home to more than half of the world’s estimated 3,200 tigers, with most living in wildlife reserves set up since the 1970s,” wrote The Guardian. “The natural habitat of the animals has almost disappeared outside reserves. Even inside designated zones, unchecked development of tourism and other industries has restricted space and food. Many end up foraging in areas with large human populations.”

Despite habitat loss, the sudden uptick in tiger attacks is likely proof that the endangered big cat is making a comeback in India.


More at the link.

My mother was attacked by a tiger in India when she was a child. Workers in a nearby field rescued her, killing the tiger with their scythes. I have one of the claws, which they gave her to mystically ward off future tiger attacks.

I love animals, but I have mixed feelings about donating money to a project whose success can cause people to die.
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»World Wildlife ad begs th...