Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,817 posts)
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 01:29 AM Apr 2014

Wow! Sandra Bullock and George Clooney in GRAVITY.

Run, don't walk, to see this outstanding movie.

It's just about 92 minutes and now I know why it wasn't longer........we wouldn't have been able to take any more excitement or stress!

Well done, though my physicist husband says they got the physics wrong...oh well, it's still exciting.

I'll be decompressing for a while yet...

*whew*

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wow! Sandra Bullock and George Clooney in GRAVITY. (Original Post) CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 OP
Or, as we used to say in San Francisco: NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #1
I LOVE that graphic, my dear NYC_SKP! CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 #3
Born August 23, 1942, there were originally only four little man icons. NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #5
How cool; I didn't know that! CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 #7
I dug it. rrneck Apr 2014 #2
Oh, I agree, my dear rrneck! CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 #4
who is Debra Bowen? Skittles Apr 2014 #6
I meant Sandra Bullock! CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 #8
awww Skittles Apr 2014 #9
It WAS good! CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 #10
We had to see it on tv because my wife gets sick from the motion on screen. progressoid Apr 2014 #11
when I was a kid I got car sick a lot Skittles Apr 2014 #17
I've read that it's a typical "damsel in distress" movie Orrex Apr 2014 #12
I agree, my dear orrex! CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 #15
That's exactly how I saw it as well. newcriminal Apr 2014 #18
Here's how I view it... Orrex Apr 2014 #24
That's the movie I saw. tammywammy Apr 2014 #21
Saw it on the big screen pokerfan Apr 2014 #13
My dear pokerfan! CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 #14
Yeah, we wanted the most intense experience possible pokerfan Apr 2014 #27
It's the kind of movie that makes you want to make movies Boom Sound 416 Apr 2014 #16
Outstanding flick. Will watch it again, for sure. (nt) Paladin Apr 2014 #19
You sound like you need a cigarette. rug Apr 2014 #20
I'm still wondering jrandom421 Apr 2014 #22
Me too... CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 #23
I was wondering NewJeffCT Apr 2014 #25
I think that was part of the ending's charm. Paladin Apr 2014 #26
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #28
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #29
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
5. Born August 23, 1942, there were originally only four little man icons.
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 01:43 AM
Apr 2014

They added the empty chair icon after world war 2 ended, they say, because the movies got so bad!



CaliforniaPeggy

(149,817 posts)
7. How cool; I didn't know that!
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 01:47 AM
Apr 2014

I know I never saw the others...

Thanks for sharing them, and their history!

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
2. I dug it.
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 01:34 AM
Apr 2014

I don't worry too much about being able to see the zipper on the monster costume if it's a good story.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,817 posts)
4. Oh, I agree, my dear rrneck!
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 01:38 AM
Apr 2014

Actually, when you look at the bare bones of the story, it was simple...

And effective.

The special effects just blew me away.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,817 posts)
8. I meant Sandra Bullock!
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 01:50 AM
Apr 2014

I am an idiot!

Thanks for pointing out my error.

Sandra Bowen was our local representative (I think) to the California Assembly. But don't quote me!

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,817 posts)
10. It WAS good!
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 01:57 AM
Apr 2014

We have a 60" flat screen TV, and it is perfect for this sort of thing.

There were a couple of scenes that made me a bit queasy too........and our screen is nothing like as big as a theater screen!

progressoid

(50,020 posts)
11. We had to see it on tv because my wife gets sick from the motion on screen.
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 03:15 PM
Apr 2014

Well, that and it was a lot cheaper to check it out from the library than go to the theater.

Skittles

(153,310 posts)
17. when I was a kid I got car sick a lot
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 05:08 PM
Apr 2014

and I've never been able to take nitrous oxide, because that floating feeling nauseates me

Orrex

(63,281 posts)
12. I've read that it's a typical "damsel in distress" movie
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 03:30 PM
Apr 2014

And that Sandra Bullock is only saved by a hallucination about a man.


Apparently, those reviewers saw a different film...

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,817 posts)
15. I agree, my dear orrex!
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 04:08 PM
Apr 2014

I didn't think there was anything typical about it.

Of course there are always plot points that you might recognize. After all, there is nothing new under the sun.

But the way the story progressed made it anything but typical in my eyes.

 

newcriminal

(2,190 posts)
18. That's exactly how I saw it as well.
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 05:28 PM
Apr 2014

Poor woman had to have a man save her. I didn't enjoy it at all, and I am not a gung ho feminist.

Orrex

(63,281 posts)
24. Here's how I view it...
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 09:21 AM
Apr 2014

With a few minor dialogue changes, her character could just as readily have been played by a male, but then the primary criticism would be "why couldn't they have cast a woman in that role?"

I also don't see the hallucination as problematic, because it's not as though ol' George actually reappeared to advise her; the solution came from inside her own brain. It was a dramatic choice, understandable given the structure of the two-character narrative.

Having made the decision to use the device of a hallucination, who else might have appeared to her? One of the other dead astronauts? Ed Harris? Her dead child? George was the most sensible option within the context of the story.


It might have been interesting to see Clooney's role also played by a woman, but I thought that he gave an entertaining performance.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
21. That's the movie I saw.
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 12:01 AM
Apr 2014

I thought it was okay, but I wouldn't watch it again. I didn't get the hype. Effects were great, but the story was ehh.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,817 posts)
14. My dear pokerfan!
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 04:06 PM
Apr 2014

It was SO intense in ordinary 2D that I don't think I could have handled it in 3D!

Really enjoyed it.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
27. Yeah, we wanted the most intense experience possible
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 02:23 PM
Apr 2014

It was pretty immersive, which is what we were looking for.

Paladin

(28,287 posts)
26. I think that was part of the ending's charm.
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 09:55 AM
Apr 2014

Wherever she landed, it just didn't fucking matter......

Response to CaliforniaPeggy (Original post)

Response to CaliforniaPeggy (Original post)

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Wow! Sandra Bullock and G...