Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh Dear. Chanel came out with an ugly line of glasses and not even (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Apr 2015 OP
b/c I have trifocals, the 5th picture, maybe.... irisblue Apr 2015 #1
Some of it looks like the 1970's aviators - LiberalElite Apr 2015 #2
squinting thru tiny lenes was a problem irisblue Apr 2015 #3
that's true - I wear LiberalElite Apr 2015 #4
Yeah those multifocal lenses are horrid in price, but wow, they sure work great when done right! I underahedgerow Apr 2015 #7
Chanel has been struggling with style the last few years. mackerel Apr 2015 #5
Are you serious? Those are gorgeous & cooler than last year even. I love high fashion eyewear underahedgerow Apr 2015 #6
Looks like my post didn't take. Baitball Blogger Apr 2015 #12
I have a student who has a pair NJCher Apr 2015 #8
You're too old. Glassunion Apr 2015 #9
so how many eyeballs will you need,,,, irisblue Apr 2015 #10
Raybans are the only glasses that I would consider timeless. Baitball Blogger Apr 2015 #11
Depends on what you mean by "timeless." malthaussen Apr 2015 #13
IIRC the BCGs recently got an update. Glassunion Apr 2015 #14
Tip of the day... Apparently google image returns some NSFW pics if you search for "new BCGs". Glassunion Apr 2015 #15
Fashion often gets recycled at some point Major Nikon Apr 2015 #16
Yikes! Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2015 #17

irisblue

(32,969 posts)
3. squinting thru tiny lenes was a problem
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 08:19 PM
Apr 2015

man...I NEED to see the fine print when the Rs are raging...big lenses or not. Hell with them and fashion. I need to see everything.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
4. that's true - I wear
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 08:30 PM
Apr 2015

the trifocals but without the lines - can't remember the name of course. They all have to be able to fit on the lens.

I was just referring to the inference that this is all something "new" because it's Chanel. But that's fashion for ya.

underahedgerow

(1,232 posts)
7. Yeah those multifocal lenses are horrid in price, but wow, they sure work great when done right! I
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 11:00 PM
Apr 2015

paid nearly 900 euros for my most recent pair of glasses, because each lens was about 250 bucks, and the frames were about 200 also. OUCH.

I love the discounts on the second pair though, that really helped. I got really chic and nice Vera Wang frames for my sunglasses, I feel like a proper fashionable woman again with them!

underahedgerow

(1,232 posts)
6. Are you serious? Those are gorgeous & cooler than last year even. I love high fashion eyewear
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 10:56 PM
Apr 2015

especially because I've been wearing the damn things for 50 years.

I remember being forced to choose the budget lines when I was a kid, we had like 3 choices, ugh. And every damn kid in school had the same ones.

I wore contacts for years, but can't make them work anymore, even trying the old hard contacts again to battle the reading issue, but alas.

So, I love most of the European high fashion glasses and in a broad view, Chanel consistently hits the marks across the board, for high bling style, to classic, subtle professional daily wear. I love their endeavors into new shapes and color tones, from bold to sleek.

It's Chanel, they turn trends into timeless classics, always have and always will!

Baitball Blogger

(46,703 posts)
12. Looks like my post didn't take.
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 01:05 AM
Apr 2015

Hope this doesn't turn out to be a duplicate. I had mentioned that the large lenses tend to date a photo. Not to mention that you don't see much of the actual person in the photo.

NJCher

(35,661 posts)
8. I have a student who has a pair
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 11:02 PM
Apr 2015

She also has blue hair which is shaved on one side of her head and shoulder length on the other.


Cher

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
9. You're too old.
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 11:43 PM
Apr 2015

Not to knock you or anything, but I sadly came to this realization many years back myself. I initially thought the same thing, that this belt, those pants, these glasses, etc. were really ugly.

Then when going through pictures of my generation's idea of fashion, I came to the realization that the prior generation thought our clothing, accessories, eye-wear, etc... was quite ugly. No they were not ugly. The critics, were just too old...

Sadly, I'm just too old.

Some looks are classic, and appeal to every generation. RayBan has aced this look...




But most fashion comes and goes (and sometimes comes back) with the times.

irisblue

(32,969 posts)
10. so how many eyeballs will you need,,,,
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 12:26 AM
Apr 2015

before you lift that injunction? I'm wearing a 2007 pair, cuz medicare does not cover another, premedicare pair( if I had known ...I would have gotten more pal)

Baitball Blogger

(46,703 posts)
11. Raybans are the only glasses that I would consider timeless.
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 01:03 AM
Apr 2015

And you are probably right about that appraisal. My reference points are old. I've seen too many photos ruined because the large glasses have locked the individual into a time warp.

Sophia Loren glasses only look good forever on Sophia Loren. Or maybe, Jackie Kennedy.

malthaussen

(17,193 posts)
13. Depends on what you mean by "timeless."
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 02:10 PM
Apr 2015

Black horn-rims, aka RPGs and BCGs, are about as timeless as they come. And still as unattractive as they were 100 years ago.

-- Mal

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
15. Tip of the day... Apparently google image returns some NSFW pics if you search for "new BCGs".
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 03:38 PM
Apr 2015

That and a lot of firearm components. Bolt Carrier Groups to be exact.

So... Firearm parts, and heinies.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
16. Fashion often gets recycled at some point
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 04:16 PM
Apr 2015

If you didn't like it much the first go around, you probably like it less on subsequent trips.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
17. Yikes!
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 06:34 PM
Apr 2015

I couldn't wear any lenses that big. They would be really thick on the edges and heavy. I'm nearsighted.
I would probably look like a fish.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Oh Dear. Chanel came out ...