The DU Lounge

Orrex

(66,709 posts) Tue Sep 12, 2017, 12:23 PM Sep 2017

Ted Cruz looks like Q if Q tried to assume human form but didn't quite get it right

And he likes teh prons.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ted Cruz looks like Q if Q tried to assume human form but didn't quite get it right (Original Post) Orrex Sep 2017 OP

He blames a staffer for looking at porn dixiegrrrrl Sep 2017 #1

Honestly I don't think it was Cruz Orrex Sep 2017 #2

True; that's pretty conventional stuff. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2017 #3

I imagine his "O" face TlalocW Sep 2017 #4

NO NO NO NO NO Orrex Sep 2017 #5

ewwwwww... dixiegrrrrl Sep 2017 #6

dixiegrrrrl

(60,144 posts)

1. He blames a staffer for looking at porn

Reply to Orrex (Original post)

Tue Sep 12, 2017, 12:42 PM

Sep 2017

Late at night
On Ted's personal computer

uh-uh...

Orrex

(66,709 posts)

2. Honestly I don't think it was Cruz

Reply to dixiegrrrrl (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 12, 2017, 12:44 PM

Sep 2017

Because I don't believe he'd bother with anything as mundane as a MFF three-way.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(129,271 posts)

3. True; that's pretty conventional stuff.

Reply to Orrex (Reply #2)

Tue Sep 12, 2017, 12:59 PM

Sep 2017

Ted probably goes more for B&D, or making whoopee with farm animals. Or maybe B&D with farm animals.

TlalocW

(15,674 posts)

4. I imagine his "O" face

Reply to Orrex (Original post)

Tue Sep 12, 2017, 01:47 PM

Sep 2017

Is the same one he makes - eyebrows slightly knitted and upturned, lips thinned - when he's trying to appear human when talking about a sensitive subject or just trying to engage with people.

TlalocW

Orrex

(66,709 posts)

5. NO NO NO NO NO

Reply to TlalocW (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 12, 2017, 02:08 PM

Sep 2017

I will not imagine it. I refuse to imagine it.

I hate you for suggesting that I should imagine it.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,144 posts)

6. ewwwwww...

Reply to TlalocW (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 12, 2017, 02:29 PM

Sep 2017

Somehow Grandpa Munster and ....you know.......THAT.......do not go together.

Reply to this discussion