Photography
Related: About this forumSome video photomicrography
I collected some samples of sand from my marine aquarium, here are some of the interesting critters I found.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)What was the equipment that you used to record these?
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)They're connected to a pc that I keep down in the cabinet below.
These videos are from the dissecting microscope on the right. Max magnification is about 75x on that one.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I've had a couple of cheap PC-friendly handheld and desktop student-grade crapola scopes.
And I've got a great 10.5 - 45 X Leica stereomicroscope, but no video connection for it.
I wonder if I can find an eyepiece adapter?
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)If I recall correctly, the Leica uses standard eyepieces, so you should be able to pull one and replace it with the camera.
Of course you'd lose that eyepiece for viewing while taking pics, but if you're taking pics of static things, it's not that big a deal to swap em out.
I have this 1957 Leitz Wetlar that I've done that with-
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)My unit predates modern digital videography, but it's so nice to know that eyepieces had a universal quality.
I'll have to look into it!
alfredo
(60,071 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Click 'switch camera' at the top to change views.
These are just celestron USB microscopes, no more than about 40x power.
Best viewing is during the day.
alfredo
(60,071 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Occasionally you'll see a dorvellid worm, acoel flatworms, or another unidentified polychaete worm with long, flexible setae.
There are also chaeopterid worms who make a burrow from mucous and sand particles- you'll occasionally see one of their detritus catching tentacles wandering the frame like a flopping rope.
alfredo
(60,071 posts)Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)you tired me out. I know the frustration of trying to keep up with some of these critters.
Fun to watch.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)so it looks kind of fast.
Here's another one- I *think* I found something I haven't seen before. I originally thought it was another ostracod, but..
An invert biologist friend of mine thinks it's actually a marine mite.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)I was moving my mouse around trying to control the movements. LOL
I am certainly no expert, but these two specimens seemed to be the same thing to me. They acted the same way, and a few of the views looked like the same thing in both samples. It must be great to have an invertebrate biologist to run things by.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)I'd seen what I thought were very small, not-quite-typical ostracods before. (Most ostracod shells are pointed ovoid, or rounded ovoid in shape, bilaterally symmetrical from the side. These were larger toward the posterior end, with an almost teardrop shape at the 'head' end.
My invert biologist buddy is just a facebook friend who I do IT work for when he gets frustrated (he's a mac guy.) I help him set up his wireless network, or a webcam for his tank, he lets me pester him with 'Ooh, whassat!??' questions.
Unfortunately, there's no "Bob's Big Book of Marine Critters" reference title for invertebrates; it's all broken down by family and sometimes even by geography. You'll get "Guide to the Marine Isopod Crustaceans of the Caribbean" by Kensley and Schotte, which is a tiny slice of a tiny slice. I believe it'd take a stack of books about waist high to cover everything.
*headdesk*